Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
it was six inches, not half a foot. This is the best the RW has to offer? That's it? It's OK with Shrub, but not OK with Obama? Moreover, this is BATF program... I doubt that higher ups had any input, for that matter. But you've drunk the Koolaid so reason has no impact on you. To quote your hero: Sad.
It's the same program, doesn't matter. It wasn't Obama that started this 'program' and 'idea'.
Well, some facts, most created jobs have been part time, with no benefits. Jobs numbers do not count the millions of unemployed who have run out of unemployment benefits and stopped looking for work. The stock market is not a very accurate measuring stick for the economy. It rises and falls based upon emotion, and it has taken off since the election. The true measure of the economy is the GDP, which is at 1 1/2 percent, pitiful, the worst recovery from a recession in history. You don't seem to keep track of what is going on very well. Israel published a report, NEVER denied by the Obama administration, that named by name a number of democrat political hacks who were sent to Israel to assist the opposition to the Prime Minister. Europe is still struggling because their nanny state and choking regulation surpasses what obama wanted and was stopped from doing
You are a master of speculation. I never supported Trump, and believe/ed he was the worst candidate my party could have nominated. Thanks to open primaries, your fellow democrats ensured he was nominated. Well, a citation is easy, obama did little when Russia invaded Ukraine, and annexed the Crimea. obama did not respond but with idle words when Russia established permanent bases and a permanent presence in Syria. He did nothing when Russia supplied very sophisticated anti air defense systems to Iran. The Balkan states are terrified of Russia and have been begging obama for support. In the last year he has grudgingly sent small numbers of US forces for their defense. I didn't call you any names, if you feel you were called a name, it is because you adopted it, not because I identified you as anything. You don't like ilk, would cohorts, fellow travelers, or just buddies work better for you ? You are wasting your time with comments about Trump, I don't care for him either. So your words have literally NO effect on me. You are right, it is sad, you are simply not perceptive enough to understand what you read. Further, you assume because you want your assumptions to be true, but a responsible reading of what was written would prove your assumptions as laughable.Citation please. Show us some proof other than Brietbart or similar RW clickbaitin' site. Just because you want it to be true, doesn't make it so.
Possibly. The percentages are high. You didn't have to be a bigot to vote for Komrade Trumpsky, but boy did it help.
Citation please... on the enabling. We know Russia is an evil player and that they consider Komrade Trumpsky one of their best assets (according to Komrade Trumpsky). Why is it that you voted for a Kremlin stooge, again???
Citation needed. Obama inherited a huge mess from Shrub. The progress has been slow, but then the hole was stupid deep. Komrade Trumpsky will put us back in the hole. Ditto on the rest of your spurious aspersions.
You mean names like "Ilk" and "snowflake"??? That's almost as phunni as a fake billionaire with a fake tan calling CNN fake news. Really, you should listen to your own sermon before asking others to follow in your path, cupcake.
Was was that you said about name calling? I'm rubber, you're glue and all that... You're just getting sillier and sillier the more apoplectic you get.
Now, go bother someone else. This sham of an argument you present is as circular as it is pathetic. To quote your hero: Sad.
It's not hard to smell RW BS. No speculation required.
We agree that he's the worst candidate by any party ever. Yet he's president.
Talk about deflection. He's YOUR candidate, not mine. Don't blame me for your mistake. That's dishonorable.
That's your citation? That's it? Groundless speculation is not a citation. You might want to look it up on Wikipedia. Why is it up to us to start a war with Russia?
Please. Our whole discussion started with your pompous use of "ilk" and then you referred to me directly as snowflake. Show some integrity here, please. Own up to what you wrote.
Ah, when names don't work you devolve straight to condescension. But really, is that the best you can do? It's obvious you're not creative enough to make a point stick. I'm guessing you don't belong to Mensa with such petulant schlock.
Do you ever "responsibly" proof read your schlock? How circular can you get? I assume because I want to assume? How droll. Guess what? I responded because... wait for it... wait for it... I wanted to respond! Woot!
OK, OK how about this one... I laughed out loud, waking my cat because... wait for it... wait for it... I wanted to laugh out loud at your tripe. News flash: I don't think this is going to help your Mensa application. Sorry to be the bearer of bad news but I thought you should know. Circular logic is never good because it's "circular". See what I did there? Now my cheeks are wet with tears of mirth. Thanks for a great start to the day.
Again, you are simply fabricating stories that one could easily dispel with facts if anyone here has the interest. I simply do not have the time nor the interest in going any further with you on this except for one item that you mention above that I'll deal with on a separate post.
First of all, I've dealt enough with your insults lately, and is the above is the best you can do?
No insult cupcake, just a statement of fact. The Congress has a right to invite whomever they choose to speak on whatever topicthey choose, especially when the President signs a treaty without the approval of Congress, required by the Constitution. Since obama, precedent means nothing. His precedents include refusing to enforce the law that applies to millions of people,
One thing I have learned about you, you NEVER address facts, you never provide facts. I think it is because you are just plain lazy. In the past, you have pontificated (erroneously) on an issue and I have provided fact citations to prove you wrong, in at least one case I gave you the location where you might find information to refute my argument, you just drifted away. Your clearly established style is to blindly spout nothings, get hurt because your factual failings are pointed out , then pout. Once again your pattern asserts itself.
Obviously you have great difficulty with the nuances of the English language. perhaps it is because you aren't an English native speaker, I don't know. Go back to the post re snowflakes. You will not read me stating directly "you are a snowflake" I attributed a certain response to snowflakes in general, leaving you to decide if you were one, obviously you decided you were. As to the rest, I can only say that you are a legend in your own mind, like many democrats I have come across. Re read it, did you get it ? maybe a third reading will help, I did specifically refer to you, but not all democrats. I know it is difficult for you, but do you see even a glimmer of a distinction between the two ? Stay in that English night class, you will eventually grasp it, then you will be able to understand the language like most Americans do. Currently, you are lost in attempting to understand what is written, and I can't draw you pictures with this keyboard. Get it together, then get back to me.It's not hard to smell RW BS. No speculation required.
We agree that he's the worst candidate by any party ever. Yet he's president.
Talk about deflection. He's YOUR candidate, not mine. Don't blame me for your mistake. That's dishonorable.
That's your citation? That's it? Groundless speculation is not a citation. You might want to look it up on Wikipedia. Why is it up to us to start a war with Russia?
Please. Our whole discussion started with your pompous use of "ilk" and then you referred to me directly as snowflake. Show some integrity here, please. Own up to what you wrote.
Ah, when names don't work you devolve straight to condescension. But really, is that the best you can do? It's obvious you're not creative enough to make a point stick. I'm guessing you don't belong to Mensa with such petulant schlock.
Do you ever "responsibly" proof read your schlock? How circular can you get? I assume because I want to assume? How droll. Guess what? I responded because... wait for it... wait for it... I wanted to respond! Woot!
I assume because I want to assume! Bwahahahaha! I might have to use that in my sig line.
In other news, I ate because I wanted to eat, I breathed because I wanted to breathe and I watched the morning news because... wait for it... wait for it... I wanted to!
I think the above pretty much speaks much more about you than I, and I am done trying to have any attempt trying to discuss anything with you. I post a link to a Politifact article that largely refutes what you posted, and then you accuse me of "NEVER addressing the facts". And then you call me "cupcake", which is a violation of the RoC here at RF in regards to name-calling.
Your idea of a nuance is a 4 lb sledge. You're pretty obvious in your condescension.
I agree. Why try to reason with an unreasonable person? He's so petty and nasty... Just like Komrade Trumpsky! Perhaps it's time for my fourth ignore of the week? Well, I am heading to Cayman Brac for the week. I might sign on, but I'll be in party mode. Scuba then party, then Scuba, then party... In between I'll try so sneak in some Scuba and some partying. For those who don't know: I call this work. It's a tough job, but someone has to do it.
His "hatred or bigotry" haven't "translated" to his actions. Sometimes when your computer is completely corrupted the reset is just what you need. The challenge of course will be not to delete anything critical on the way. Trump is really just about a leaner/meaner government, and also one more focused on our own problems rather than saving the world. That has a potential to make things better far outside of the borders of the USA, if it is done well.
Don't mistake his harshness for volatility, he just doesn't take anyone's crap. If someone prints lies he calls them out, and I think he has the right to. There are no hostile policies toward foreigners that I am aware of, but please feel free to explain.
I already beat ya to the punch.
Have a great trip! I'm gonna be in that "socialist" country to our north
early next week, but let me tell ya that I ain't doing any scuba diving.
I don't think that's what they're referring to. Most people think the country they live/grew up in is great.
The republican establishment in congress is much more dangerous than Trump. Conservatives voted to keep the establishment running the show. Even adding more to the swamp. Republicans in congress are lobbied by some of the most crooked and corrupt corporations in the country.
And if one checks it out, Exxon/Mobile has one of the worst environmental records of all American-owned oil companies.
Yes he could turn out to be worse, that is a possibility. I see no difference between his statements, and the fact that the democrat candidate broke the law in the handling of classified material. Yes, the FBI director, using prosecutorial discretion, he did not have, did not seek to indict her. He added an intent element to a statute that didn't have one. The law as written by Congress is a general intent law, no specific intent is required, Comey allowed a felon to go free ( read the statute), I dealt with the law every day for 25 years, and by education and experience am as well qualified as Comey to to comment on the subject. So, both candidates were total and complete losers. The worst was clinton, the next worst was trump. That is irrelevant now, the issue is obama. Lets expand it to his party as well. Let me call them the idiot party, here's why. When Republicans had control of the Senate in the 90's, they refused to use the so called "nuclear option" that would have given them control of nominations by a simple majority, democrats, so eager to impose their will over everything, exploded the fillibuster, now they are out, have set the precedent, and they will have no say in the selection of cabinet nominees. Republicans may even expand it to the Supreme court, destroying what the Founders desired, discussion and compromise in Congress. Thank you democrats, you have cut off your nose to spite your face, and encouraged more division. obama, with the same attitude, refused to work with congress, and tried to do everything he wanted by "executive order", continuously bypassing congress, denying the intent of established law. Having set that precedent, most everything he tried will be eliminated by executive order, and I suspect, since obama let Pandora out of the box, we will reel headlong to a more and more imperial presidency, the legislative branch will be more and more bypassed, they and us won't do anything but what their partisans want, more spiteful division, more dirty politics, a nation further divided. ALL the fault of the democrats, the end justifies the means as their mantra, have obliterated the checks and balances, have eliminated compromise, maybe have set the seeds for another civil war, following obama's precedent, the worst president in history.
LOL, you allegedly put me on your ignore list close to a year ago, but you just keep coming back, like a moth to a flame. You and your like thinkers think gibberish somehow is superior to logic and reason. Reading what you two post is like reading a Laurel and Hardy treatise on the philosophy of Soren Kierkergarrd. Nonsense, but amusing. You two couldn't hit your butts with a hand full of sand.