Greatest I am
Well-Known Member
It shows me that Dems & Pubs have more in common than they'd like to admit.
No argument but the Democrat hierarchy knows enough not to air their dirty laundry in public.
Regards
DL
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
It shows me that Dems & Pubs have more in common than they'd like to admit.
Except that you seem to be just now noticing something that I have known has been going on for quite some time.
It appears you give yourself far to much credit.
Hate to burst your little ego bubble, but I do not have anywhere near that much influence on politics.
That you are all surprised by your recent discovery of something that has been happening for decades, is almost as entertaining as your failed assumptions.
I don't think so.....those primary fights get pretty up close & personal.No argument but the Democrat hierarchy knows enough not to air their dirty laundry in public.
What's an alternative strategy during election time that you think would work differently than what you are being critical of? Or I guess explain how a Republican would put country's interest ahead of Republican interest and that works out for Republicans. Use any political issue that makes sense to you. I can think of a couple, just wondering if you can and would be willing to explain it.
As others have said, that motto is not new. I think most countries on the planet would appear to put own interests ahead of world interests, and in so doing would be skeptical of any individual representing 'world interests.'
All these issues cut at least two ways (if highly aware of the partisan politics at work) and probably at least three ways if willing to tolerate a middle ground where independents reside. But that third way will be quickly relegated to one of the two depending on the issue. Take 10 issues into account and the middle ground will be pigeonholed into something else entirely, i.e. libertarian.
I don't think so.....those primary fights get pretty up close & personal.
It varies from election to election.Not to the point of denigration that Republicans are using. At least not that I have seen.
Regards
DL
That Is true but also a lot of democrats are holding there noses to vote for Hillary too. I feel that both parties could have done better.
I am sure that if they could, they would have.
All the party's know that putting up their best is the way to go.
If they had better, we would all know it.
Regards
DL
It varies from election to election.
Whadduz Eleanor know!Very likely but when a delegate shows the disrespect to another delegate at the levels that the current batch are showing, it shows not only his disrespect for the delegate but also to all the people who voted for him already.
Any delegate that shows that much disrespect for others deserves to lose because he is not focusing on the issues that might swing the people he is disrespecting into his camp.
All politicians should remember this quote.
Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt
I do/did not follow American politics enough to know if Roosevelt was a good president or not, but I like his wife's thinking on this.
Regards
DL
If your right and those two are the best we got. .........ouch.
Whadduz Eleanor know!
I'd rather discuss everything.....except the Kardashians.
No argument that people are partisan to their own little tribes and have ignored the rest of the world.
Look at the environment.
Has partisan voting created a good world to pass over to our next generation?
Should we be promoting my tribe right or wrong or should we vote our conscience?
Regards
DL
They are the choice that your oligarch owners have bought, so I would lay the blame on those as well as the American people who have allowed the oligarchs to enslave them.
That would apply to most so called free countries who call themselves democracies.
http://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-echochambers-27074746
Regards
DL
Given the way things are currently set up, we ought to probably vote based on strategies that will help our causes or vote against ones that will hurt our causes.
In the past 5 election cycles for POTUS, given my conscience, I found it easy to be a proud non-voter. Thus, the strategic thing I noted above was not part of my thinking. Right about now, I'm 50/50 on voting and it is based on the strategic notation.
In the grand scheme of things, this too shall pass and I'm a little surprised I'm even considering voting, but alas I am.
Ah...your not from the USA I take it.
For evil to grow, all those who are intelligent need do is not vote for whom they think is the best of the garbage.
But I do hear your thinking that intelligent people might conclude that the best of the garbage is not worthy of their time.
I just can't agree for the stated reason.
America was created by the people protesting against injustice.
What happened to Americans? Where did they go?
I think intentionally voting for "the lesser of two evils" is intending for 'evil' to grow.
I'm up for that debate. I have around 15 reasons for not voting, one of them stating 'lesser of two evils is perpetuating 'evil'.
Rhetorical questions that may not have a satisfactory response.
then you should stop talking about me, right?Repeating yourself is not a good sign of attention.
As to you referencing me.
Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt
Regards
DL