Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Yes, you are.Let`s say for a hypothetical that I am pro choice and I leave a woman pregnant.
She decides to have the baby even though none of us wanted the baby when we had sex.
Am I legaly bound to provide to that baby even though I didn`t want to have him/her?
Yes, you are.
You talk about equal rights whilst throwing out the fact that it is the woman, not the man, who carries the fetus to term...So if we want true equal rights, and if we are saying that the zygote is not a human being, the men should have legal rights to renounce to the zygote or the baby the same way the woman has the legal right to not only renounce but kill him.
The man agreed upon the second he stuck his penis into a vagina.So in reality, this not only gives women the choice to have the baby or not, but forces men into paying for something they never agreed upon.
um...In other words, it is not at all a law "against women" if women were not allowed to abort, is it?
You talk about equal rights whilst throwing out the fact that it is the woman, not the man, who carries the fetus to term...
The man agreed upon the second he stuck his penis into a vagina.
Just like he chose engage in an activity that might produce a pregnancy...So what? She is choosing to. If the zygote is truly a "thing" or not human being, then she chose to carry it knowing full well the effects.
To bad that line won't get you out of child support if you make a baby...Most pro-choicers don`t . Neverheard of any one night stand where they agree that if a baby results, the man is paying half of it.
Just like he chose engage in an activity that might produce a pregnancy...
and?The woman did too.
I see the woman takes responsability if she wants but the man is forced to.
and?
I fail to see the problem.
Is this whole thread nothing more than you crying "it's not fair"?
debate about what, exactly?it is an invitation to debate abut it, if you don`t care to, you may leave
Fairness is of basic importance in morality and it is regularly claimed as such by pro choicers.
debate about what, exactly?
So far this thread seems to be nothing more than you saying "it's not fair" and seemingly getting up set cause no one is patting you on the back telling you it is alright.
I never made any claims to it being unfair.If you know it is unfair, then you agree the laws regarding it should change?
Do you like unfair laws?
What is more unfair?
etc
If you can`t see topics to debate you may want to put the hood back and also the shiny red lanterns in your eyes, they seem to be blinding you
I never made any claims to it being unfair.
The whole "the guy should be able to run around sticking his penis into every willing vagina with absolutely no consequences or responsibility" defense does not help your argument.
I propose both of them would have responsability, you propose only the male one.
and?
I fail to see the problem.
Is this whole thread nothing more than you crying "it's not fair"?
I never made any claims to it being unfair.
it all seems rather simple to me, if a guy does not want the possibility of his having to pay child support, stop having sex with women.
The whole "the guy should be able to run around sticking his penis into every willing vagina with absolutely no consequences or responsibility" defense does not help your argument.
I'll tell you what's not fair. Stretch marks, labor, and vaginal tearing.
You decided to have sex, you know sex can result in pregnancy, the child is half yours.Let`s say for a hypothetical that I am pro choice and I leave a woman pregnant.
She decides to have the baby even though none of us wanted the baby when we had sex.
Am I legaly bound to provide to that baby even though I didn`t want to have him/her?
You agreed when you inserted your penis into her vagina. If a baby would be such a burden on your life and is something that you just do not at all want, then don't have sex because that is how they are made. It's no different than someone who knows they become violent when they get drunk, so they refrain from drinking even though they may not want to, but it's better than another assault and battery charge.So in reality, this not only gives women the choice to have the baby or not, but forces men into paying for something they never agreed upon.