• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Got curious about something... (regards abortion and father`s duties)

Me Myself

Back to my username
Let`s say for a hypothetical that I am pro choice and I leave a woman pregnant.

She decides to have the baby even though none of us wanted the baby when we had sex.

Am I legaly bound to provide to that baby even though I didn`t want to have him/her?
 

McBell

Unbound
Let`s say for a hypothetical that I am pro choice and I leave a woman pregnant.

She decides to have the baby even though none of us wanted the baby when we had sex.

Am I legaly bound to provide to that baby even though I didn`t want to have him/her?
Yes, you are.
 

Me Myself

Back to my username
So if we want true equal rights, and if we are saying that the zygote is not a human being, the men should have legal rights to renounce to the zygote or the baby the same way the woman has the legal right to not only renounce but kill him.

So in reality, this not only gives women the choice to have the baby or not, but forces men into paying for something they never agreed upon.
 

McBell

Unbound
So if we want true equal rights, and if we are saying that the zygote is not a human being, the men should have legal rights to renounce to the zygote or the baby the same way the woman has the legal right to not only renounce but kill him.
You talk about equal rights whilst throwing out the fact that it is the woman, not the man, who carries the fetus to term...

Care to try again?

So in reality, this not only gives women the choice to have the baby or not, but forces men into paying for something they never agreed upon.
The man agreed upon the second he stuck his penis into a vagina.
 

Me Myself

Back to my username
You talk about equal rights whilst throwing out the fact that it is the woman, not the man, who carries the fetus to term...

So what? She is choosing to. If the zygote is truly a "thing" or not human being, then she chose to carry it knowing full well the effects. the woman would be sacrificing 9 months, the man would be sacrificing as long as the child has 18.

The man agreed upon the second he stuck his penis into a vagina.

Most pro-choicers don`t . Neverheard of any one night stand where they agree that if a baby results, the man is paying half of it.
 

McBell

Unbound
So what? She is choosing to. If the zygote is truly a "thing" or not human being, then she chose to carry it knowing full well the effects.
Just like he chose engage in an activity that might produce a pregnancy...

Most pro-choicers don`t . Neverheard of any one night stand where they agree that if a baby results, the man is paying half of it.
To bad that line won't get you out of child support if you make a baby...
 

Me Myself

Back to my username
and?

I fail to see the problem.

Is this whole thread nothing more than you crying "it's not fair"?

it is an invitation to debate abut it, if you don`t care to, you may leave :shrug:

Fairness is of basic importance in morality and it is regularly claimed as such by pro choicers.
 

McBell

Unbound
it is an invitation to debate abut it, if you don`t care to, you may leave :shrug:

Fairness is of basic importance in morality and it is regularly claimed as such by pro choicers.
debate about what, exactly?
So far this thread seems to be nothing more than you saying "it's not fair" and seemingly getting up set cause no one is patting you on the back telling you it is alright.
 

Me Myself

Back to my username
debate about what, exactly?
So far this thread seems to be nothing more than you saying "it's not fair" and seemingly getting up set cause no one is patting you on the back telling you it is alright.

If you know it is unfair, then you agree the laws regarding it should change?

Do you like unfair laws?

What is more unfair?

etc

If you can`t see topics to debate you may want to put the hood back and also the shiny red lanterns in your eyes, they seem to be blinding you :p
 

McBell

Unbound
If you know it is unfair, then you agree the laws regarding it should change?

Do you like unfair laws?

What is more unfair?

etc

If you can`t see topics to debate you may want to put the hood back and also the shiny red lanterns in your eyes, they seem to be blinding you :p
I never made any claims to it being unfair.

it all seems rather simple to me, if a guy does not want the possibility of his having to pay child support, stop having sex with women.

The whole "the guy should be able to run around sticking his penis into every willing vagina with absolutely no consequences or responsibility" defense does not help your argument.
 

Me Myself

Back to my username
I never made any claims to it being unfair.

Then it is very simple to see that is part of the debate.

The whole "the guy should be able to run around sticking his penis into every willing vagina with absolutely no consequences or responsibility" defense does not help your argument.

I don`t see why not. You are saying that the men have less rights than the women to have heterosexual sex. Or that their rights are more punishable, which ends up being roughly the same.

I propose both of them would have responsability, you propose only the male one.
 

Koldo

Outstanding Member
I never made any claims to it being unfair.

it all seems rather simple to me, if a guy does not want the possibility of his having to pay child support, stop having sex with women.

The whole "the guy should be able to run around sticking his penis into every willing vagina with absolutely no consequences or responsibility" defense does not help your argument.

I once heard: 'if a woman does not want the possibility of having to support a child, stop having sex with men.'.

Still, it looks like this wasn't enough to prevent abortion from becoming legal in some places...

You can't really be in favour of ( nearly ) any sort of abortion and at the same time use this kind of line.
 
Last edited:

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
Let`s say for a hypothetical that I am pro choice and I leave a woman pregnant.

She decides to have the baby even though none of us wanted the baby when we had sex.

Am I legaly bound to provide to that baby even though I didn`t want to have him/her?
You decided to have sex, you know sex can result in pregnancy, the child is half yours.
Why is it some guys think they have the option to opt out of taking responsibility for a child they helped make, even though opting out of responsibility in any other area in life is considered a very bad thing?


So in reality, this not only gives women the choice to have the baby or not, but forces men into paying for something they never agreed upon.
You agreed when you inserted your penis into her vagina. If a baby would be such a burden on your life and is something that you just do not at all want, then don't have sex because that is how they are made. It's no different than someone who knows they become violent when they get drunk, so they refrain from drinking even though they may not want to, but it's better than another assault and battery charge.

Why should men not have to "man up" and accept responsibility of their actions? Yes the woman is the one that has to carry to term, but it takes two to make a baby. It's like a two-man demolition crew causing a botched demolition that caused damage to nearby buildings, and one of them tries to dodge the consequences because it was the other guy that pushed the button even though both of them wired the explosives.
Or if you get drunk, drive home, hit someone, and try to get out of the consequences because that person you hit shouldn't have been at that particular place and particular time.
 
Top