I know this revolves a lot around Aisha but please bear with me. Union posted a thread about Aisha in the Quran only section:
And this was one of the links he posted in his thread:
AYESHA AGE THE MYTH OF* A PROVERBIAL WEDDING EXPOSED
Bismillah Alrhman alraheem
Hello again illykitty,
i really was hesitated to answer or not, not for something about myself but about you as i don't know if that really will help you to rest over your mind or not, i'm not blaming you for that, i know how seekers act, i'm just worried while we are trying to fix things make it worst.
i didn't read the whole thread just the link, and wait till see will they be a debate or not about the thread.
i'll quote now from the link and reply it:-
Most of these narratives printed in the Hadith books are reported only by Hisham ibn `urwah reporting on the authority of his father. First of all, more people than just one, two or three should logically have reported. It is strange that no one from Medinah, where Hisham ibn `urwah lived the first seventy one years of his life has narrated the event, even though in Medinah his pupils included people as well known as Malik ibn Anas. The origins of the report of the narratives of this event are people from Iraq, where Hisham is reported to have shifted after living in Medinah for seventy-one years.
there's a couple of misinformation here, i don't actually the reason behind it, is it made by ignorance or it was meant! or it's me who misunderstood it
first thing that it's already more than two or three had reported the hadith not only Hisham ibn urwah, i'd like first to highlight the Hz. Ayisha was the aunt of the father of Hisham "Urwah" as Urawah was the son of her older sister Asmaa, so he knows his aunt surly and took to her face to face, no doubt about that.
second, it was narrated with the authority of others rather than Hisham ibn urwah, for example in sahih Muslim book 8, chapter 10, hadith 3311, the isnad of this hadith was Aiysha told alaswad told abraham told alamaash told Muslim, this is the chain of people from Ayisha to Muslim, it's totally different than the way of Hisham ibn urawah on the authority of his father
third way to Ayisha , Ayisha told yahya ibn abdelrahman told mohamed ibn amr told abo dawd, so the hadith in the book of abu dawd but i couldn't find it's number in the English version, usually the numbers are too different from Arabic to English versions
also it was reported in other books like Musnad ahmed ibn hanbal
second false claim that all of the narratives are ppl of Iraq where Hisham ibn urawh moved, and that's a false claim, there are three narratives are from the people of medinah who narrated this hadith in the authority of hisham when he were in medinah "i.e. while his memory was still fresh"
Tehzibu'l-tehzib, one of the most well known books on the life and the reliability of the narrators of the traditions of the Prophet (pbuh) report that according to Yaqub ibn Shaibah:
" He [Hisham] is highly reliable, his narratives are acceptable, except what he narrated after moving over to Iraq." (REF: Tehzi'bu'l-tehzi'b, Ibn Hajar Al-`asqala'ni, Dar Ihya al-turath al-Islami, 15th century. Vol 11, p. 50).
Correct claim but not applied for the hadith of age of Ayisha as there are three narratives narated it on the authority of hisham while he was in medinah as i mentioned above and their names are as following :-
abdualrahman ibn abu alzenad, his father and abduallah ibn mohamed ibn hayhay ibn urwah, do you understand all of that stuff?
CONCLUSION: Al-Tabari is unreliable in the matter of determining Ayesha’s age.
and this for me shows how the author of this article isn't familiar by Islamic books, Imam Tabri or ibn Jarir tabri, isn't scholar in Hadith, he's a historian and so his mission isn't to tell me this authentic or not, his main mission is to collect news from people, and to mention how he get this news, i.e. his source, this source could be valid or invalid and so in the book of history of Tabari you will find some biblical texts that contradicts with quran, that not means that it;s Tabari's opinion, but he's just telling us that there's another historian story for example abut prophet david and it's source is the biblical text, it's contradicted with the quran and it's not authentic, but mentioned it as a collection of all stories and so before you read a book you have to know the author's target of this book and his way of work in that work, but seems this articles's author missed that
and you can take the same reason as a reply for evidence#4
to be Continued in shaa allah