Harsh Truth: If Intelligent Design is Untestable . . .

[leibowde84]

I assume that you are just not telling the truth.

Stubbornness in action. Look it up.

 

[Mohammad Nur Syamsu]

Emotions are subjective. I thought you of all people would know that.

When you say subjective, you mean that emotions can be objectively measured in the brain with a brainscanner.

 

[Mohammad Nur Syamsu]

Stubbornness in action. Look it up.

You just say anything whatsover to keep your habit of regarding good and evil as fact. And that was one more aribitrary statement in this pursuit of yours, regardless of the facts of the matter.

 

[leibowde84]

When you say subjective, you mean that emotions can be objectively measured in the brain with a brainscanner.

No, I don't think that. I don't discount any possibilities, as that would be incredibly stubborn / foolish. Can you stop being so dishonest about my claims. I never stated that I thought this to be true.

 

[leibowde84]

You just say anything whatsover to keep your habit of regarding good and evil as fact. And that was one more aribitrary statement in this pursuit of yours, regardless of the facts of the matter.

So you deny that he said it?

 

[leibowde84]

You just say anything whatsover to keep your habit of regarding good and evil as fact. And that was one more aribitrary statement in this pursuit of yours, regardless of the facts of the matter.

I don't believe that good and evil are objective, so your claim is illogical. Don't assume ... it makes an *** out of you and me.

 

[Mohammad Nur Syamsu]

No, I don't think that. I don't discount any possibilities, as that would be incredibly stubborn / foolish. Can you stop being so dishonest about my claims. I never stated that I thought this to be true.

You just rejected regarding the existence of the spirit as a matter of opinion, this means you also do not regard the existence of emotions as a matter of opinion.

Again, you just say arbitrary things to support your habit of knowledge of good and evil.

 

[Mohammad Nur Syamsu]

So you deny that he said it?

Yes.

 

[leibowde84]

You just rejected regarding the existence of the spirit as a matter of opinion, this means you also do not regard the existence of emotions as a matter of opinion.

Again, you just say arbitrary things to support your habit of knowledge of good and evil.

I never said that I don't believe in the soul. You are, yet again, being dishonest, as you are just making that up. If you disagree, all you have to do is cite my comment. Short of that ... accept defeat.

 

[leibowde84]

Yes.

Stubbornness in action again. Here you go. You don't have to live in denial of the truth anymore!!

The Pope on evolution - CMI Mobile

 

[Mohammad Nur Syamsu]

I never said that I don't believe in the soul. You are, yet again, being dishonest, as you are just making that up. If you disagree, all you have to do is cite my comment. Short of that ... accept defeat.

You wrote:
"They stopped using the terms "spirit" and "soul" because they are ill-defined, vague terms. Human beings have found more appropriate/specific terms to describe mental processes. Vague terms don't do much good when trying to better understand how organisms and life exists in reality."

 

[leibowde84]

You wrote:
"They stopped using the terms "spirit" and "soul" because they are ill-defined, vague terms. Human beings have found more appropriate/specific terms to describe mental processes. Vague terms don't do much good when trying to better understand how organisms and life exists in reality."

You proved my point. You are just reading things into my comments that aren't there. There is nothing here suggesting that I don't believe in the spirit or soul. Just that more specific terms have been developed and used to describe mental processes. That's all. You are again blatantly lying.

 

[Mohammad Nur Syamsu]

Stubbornness in action again. Here you go. You don't have to live in denial of the truth anymore!!

The Pope on evolution - CMI Mobile

There is nothing much in it beyond acknowledging the fact that children are the offspring of their parents, descendancy. The pope still correctly identifies creation has how all beings originate, not evolution.

 

[leibowde84]

There is nothing much in it beyond acknowledging the fact that children are the offspring of their parents, descendancy. The pope still correctly identifies creation has how all beings originate, not evolution.

Now I see. You don't know what evolution is, as it says absolutely nothing about the origin of life.

 

[Mohammad Nur Syamsu]

You proved my point. You are just reading things into my comments that aren't there. There is nothing here suggesting that I don't believe in the spirit or soul. Just that more specific terms have been developed and used to describe mental processes. That's all. You are again blatantly lying.

Obviously the terms vague, and better, would indicate that you discarded belief in the soul for something else.

 

[Mohammad Nur Syamsu]

Now I see. You don't know what evolution is, as it says absolutely nothing about the origin of life.

On the origin of species.

 

[leibowde84]

There is nothing much in it beyond acknowledging the fact that children are the offspring of their parents, descendancy. The pope still correctly identifies creation has how all beings originate, not evolution.

Evolution only speaks to how organisms adapted over billions of years. Nothing about how life began initially.

 

[leibowde84]

On the origin of species.

Not the origin of life. Not the same thing. Sorry.

 

[leibowde84]

Obviously the terms vague, and better, would indicate that you discarded belief in the soul for something else.

Nope. Again being dishonest or just illogical. A term being vague in no way means that something doesn't exist. I even provided the meaning of the term vague for your reference.

 

[Mohammad Nur Syamsu]

Not the origin of life. Not the same thing. Sorry.

It is about origins. And as far as I know the pope correctly conceives of creation as origins, for species and anything else.