What is a "while man"?Had a while man allowed this type of bigotry under his watch you wouldn’t have a problem with him being taken to task
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
What is a "while man"?Had a while man allowed this type of bigotry under his watch you wouldn’t have a problem with him being taken to task
A Caucasian adult male. I just don’t like it when some people try to play the race card or the gender card when they are treated the same as others of a different gender or raceWhat is a "while man"?
Give the context where calling for genocide of the Jews is acceptableThe question of should it be banned to say "death to Jews" (or whatever it was that was asked if it would be allowed or not), replying it depends on the context should be the only appropriate abd suitable response for a university.
She is being asked to explain TO THE PEOPLE THAT FOSTER ALL THAT FESTERING HATRED why it has infected her student population? And why she can't stop it? Maybe she was just too polite or prudent to call out the flaming hypocrites to their faces. Especially given that many of these would-be 'masters of the universe' are Harvard alumni and members of the little rich boys secret frat.Oh stop it! This is not about sexism, this is not about racism, this is about a president that has allowed hatred to fester under her watch and she is being forced to explain why. Had a while man allowed this type of bigotry under his watch you wouldn’t have a problem with him being taken to task
No she was not asked that, she was asked if calling for genocide of the Jews was considered hate speech. This sounds like a simple yes or no question to me, have no idea why someone would find this difficultShe is being asked to explain TO THE PEOPLE THAT FOSTER ALL THAT FESTERINGso HATRED why it has infected her student population? And why she can't stop it?
Except that no one was calling for that. And the question was just absurd grandstanding by men who couldn't care less about who kills whom so long as they can make political hay from it.No she was not asked that, she was asked if calling for genocide of the Jews was considered hate speech. This sounds like a simple yes or no question to me, have no idea why someone would find this difficult
No, the reason nobody asked is because nobody at the College was calling for the extermination of PalestiniansNo one asked if Israelis are guilty of hate speech for calling for the extermination of Palestinians because criticizing that would be anti-Semitism
First of all the one asking the questions was a woman so quit trying to make this a sexist thing it is not. Second if nobody was calling for the extermination of the Jews, the question would not have been asked.Except that no one was calling for that. And the question was just absurd grandstanding by men who couldn't care less about who kills whom so long as they can make political hay from it.
Of course it would have been asked, because it was an absurdly loaded and leading question, like; "So when exactly did you stop beating your wife, Mr. Brown?" No one was ever calling for the extermination of Jews at Harvard. No one at Harvard would be that stupid, even if they felt that way. But the whole point of the "inquiry" was to stir up as much outrage and animosity as possible and aim it at those entitled brats and their ignorant, affirmative action, liberal flunkey administrators because that plays really well back on "Bubba-land" Twitter.First of all the one asking the questions was a woman so quit trying to make this a sexist thing it is not. Second if nobody was calling for the extermination of the Jews, the question would not have been asked.
If you support Israel you support the extermination of the Palestinians, pure and simple that is their goalNo, the reason nobody asked is because nobody at the College was calling for the extermination of Palestinians
You can't think of any?Give the context where calling for genocide of the Jews is acceptable
Sich a loaded question would never work in the real world because the response would be “I have never hit my wife”Of course it would have been asked, because it was an absurdly loaded and leading question, like; "So when exactly did you stop beating your wife, Mr. Brown?"
How do you know this? How do you know the person asking didn’t have proof?No one was ever calling for the extermination of Jews at Harvard.
Foolish and wrongIf you support Israel you support the extermination of the Palestinians, pure and simple that is their goal
As far as I am concerned there are none but you apparently think there isIf you support Israel you support the extermination of the Palestinians, pure and simple that is their goal
I know this because my brain works. And because I know what your "heroes" are really up to. My eyes can still 'see'.Sich a loaded question would never work in the real world because the response would be “I have never hit my wife”
How do you know this? How do you know the person asking didn’t have proof?
IOW your own unsubstantiated opinion. Might be good enough for you but don’t expect anyone else to buy itI know this because my brain works. And because I know what your "heroes" are really up to. My eyes can still 'see'.
Everyone else buys it because they have working eyes and ears and brains, as well. It's only the ignorant "Bubbas" back in "Bubba-land" that think these phony political traitors and charlatans are conducting any sort of legitimate inquiry. And they're just being played for the fools that they are.IOW your own unsubstantiated opinion. Might be good enough for you but don’t expect anyone else to buy it
It appears to be accurate. Israel's "extermination" ofFoolish and wrong
Then how come she didn’t say nobody called for the genocide of the Jews?Everyone else buys it because they have working eyes and ears and brains, as well. It's only the ignorant "Bubbas" back in "Bubba-land" that think these phony political traitors and charlatans are conducting any sort of legitimate inquiry. And they're just being played for the fools that they are.