Has science revealed God?

[ogmios]

No one is ever going to be able to prove or disprove God or any religion because all religons are about having blind faith in something. You can't prove it because you don't know its true, you just have faith that it is. And you can't disprove it because, well, theres no fact to disprove.

Good point, but when scientists have found that there is one constant in all the universe, one has to conclude that it must be the creator of that universe. The co-incidence that it looks humanoid gives credence to religious belief's of a God, hence the question : Has science found proof God exists?:angel2: My opinion how ever difficult it is to believe is yes! The Mandelbrot set is the basic image of God.

 

[crystalonyx]

Good point, but when scientists have found that there is one constant in all the universe, one has to conclude that it must be the creator of that universe. The co-incidence that it looks humanoid gives credence to religious belief's of a God, hence the question : Has science found proof God exists?:angel2: My opinion how ever difficult it is to believe is yes! The Mandelbrot set is the basic image of God.

This post makes no sense.

 

[camanintx]

Good point, but when scientists have found that there is one constant in all the universe, one has to conclude that it must be the creator of that universe.

Sorry, but you haven't shown how these Mandelbrot sets are a part of anything other than some obscure computer algorithm for which you have no references.

 

[painted wolf]

now if you look at it in three dimentions it looks much less "human".

sorry about the massive size... I can't seem to make it smaller.

wa:do

 

[painted wolf]

does god also look like this?
Image:Mandel zoom 05 tail part.jpg - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

What does this say about the nature of god? Perfect for a college dorm poster.

wa:do

 

[logician]

And I thought god looked like an old white man with a beard (me - well sort of old).

There go my delusions of grandeur.

 

[ogmios]

Mans first reaction to something they do not want to understand is always ridicule and laughter. Stop for a second.. and wonder if perhaps it could be the basic image of what God looks like 3-d or not, the 3-d image shows a shape emenating from within itself, would we not expect that the "Creator" of all natural wonders would act/create in this way...from within itself?

 

[BucephalusBB]

Mans first reaction to something they do not want to understand is always ridicule and laughter. Stop for a second.. and wonder if perhaps it could be the basic image of what God looks like 3-d or not, the 3-d image shows a shape emenating from within itself, would we not expect that the "Creator" of all natural wonders would act/create in this way...from within itself?

Now you are fishing! Nobody knows how God could look like. You found a picture in math taht doesn't even really look like a human, You make it one in your head and once you receive a 3d picture that looks even less like a human, you make that God..

 

[painted wolf]

or its sucking into itself... not creation but destruction.
Thats the problem with drawing conclusions from pictures... its all up to the viewer.

I find much of the Mandelbrot set looks more like a college acid trip than god.

wa:do

 

[ogmios]

God is everything we all see that is found in nature! The Mandelbrot set is the smallest geometric re-occurring constant found in nature and to me it looks like the shape of man. As for the acid trip, i would have no idea. The figure is exploding not imploding. Painted wolf you are right it is up to the individual viewing the picture, but to say it does not resemble man is to ignore the FACT that it does. One day you will remember this post and say to yourself... how the heck did he know that?? I tell you that science has proven using a computer that all things in nature are related back to the Mandelbrot set, choose to doubt or to believe, it means nothing to me. I have nothing to gain from telling a lie. I am trying to help mankind understand that we as humans are derived from God and all of nature is derived(created) by God. The Mandelbrot is God's building block. I wished i could find that documentry i saw in 1998-1999 on the ABC here in Australia, then for sure you would all believe.
Blessings to all

 

[Cacafire]

Science has determined via Fractal Geometry that infinity small exists and that the
smallest re-occurring shape they can find, looks similar to our human shape.


(man made in God's image???)
Then they took 5 basic life principles found in all living things, and applied them; with the use of a computer, to this shape, and the computer comes up with photographic quality pictures of animals, coastlines, plants, fish, mountain ranges, stellar constellations, every day things in our lives and in nature, would we be able to say that all living things have the same basic fabric?
We have been told that we are made in God's image, Is this proof of that?
I open this question to anyone to comment on. I am passing on what has come before my eye's and I will say that my logic tells me this is the basic fabric of all life in the universe. This has caused me to stop and think. What are your views about this?

If I have been unclear in the description of my understanding it just shows how complex it is to prove that God exists. This is the best I can come up with.
I will do my best to clarify any Questions anyone has.:angel2:

The shape looks nothing like humans. You see a shape that appears to have a body and five appendages, and think that it is a human.

I've seen these pictures, the same human imagination persists throughout. But it's still imagination, and has no bearing on it's actual function of anything.

 

[painted wolf]

reticulated sea star

Our lord and master?

wa:do

 

[ogmios]

The shape looks nothing like humans. You see a shape that appears to have a body and five appendages, and think that it is a human.

I've seen these pictures, the same human imagination persists throughout. But it's still imagination, and has no bearing on it's actual function of anything.

So say you

 

[Storm]

I still say it looks more like a baby penguin.

 

[UnTheist]

so say you

NO U!

 

[oldcajun]

If God could be revealed by science, which is limited to the material world, He would not be God.

 

[logician]

If God could be revealed by science, which is limited to the material world, He would not be God.

There's no logical reason why this should be true.

 

[BucephalusBB]

There's no logical reason why this should be true.

Well at least nobody would believe him/her..
If (s)he is stuck to our world, (s)he wouldn't be flying or creating earth or whatever to show us. It would be a new Jesus at tops.

 

[Don Penguinoini]

I rather expect that the high priests of Madison Avenue beat the scientists to it.

Exhibit 1:

Exhibit 2:

In regards to the Op, I think it is more indicative of the fact that some people have very active imaginations rather than being so-called "evidence" of god.

Exhibit 2 has my votes. Big cute and fluffy...(and of course its white )

 

[Don Penguinoini]

There's no logical reason why this should be true.

There's no logical reason why this shouldn't be true.

(i just had to say that )