Has who asserts for "existing” or "non-existing" of something actively to lift burden of proof?

[Thermos aquaticus]

"There are atheists who also like a good debate, just like many theists."

I welcome that, but they the Atheism people, fail to provide any evidences in support of Atheism they so fervently demand from the Believers. Don't they, please?
Regards

The burden of proof lies with the person who claims that gods exist, not with those who don't believe them.

 

[Willamena]

I believe, anybody who asserts* something whether for "existing" something or "non-existing" of something actively, has to lift the burden of proof, please.
And it is reasonable.
Right, please?

Regards

They have the burden of proof. Don't know about lifting it.

 

[Willamena]

The burden of proof lies with the person who claims that gods exist, not with those who don't believe them.

The burden lies with the person who posits a way the world is, whether it be that they believe something or that they don't.

 

[Willamena]

Obviously, the burden of proof lies with the theist. They are making the assertion that God exists.

Person A: I don't believe in science.

Person B: That's absurd. What is your reasoning for dismissing all of science?

Person A: I don't have to explain myself to you, it's those people who believe in science who have to explain themselves.