So am I in this and my previous post but I don't command a following of unquestioning toadies. Maybe I'm not being enough of an obnoxious, opinionated prat, or maybe I'm not being loud enough.
Everything. Ever. Let me give you a few examples of why she's a fact-allergic troll:
She is not politically correct, she would be the first to admit that, but she does talk at lot of sense.
She has strong views and expresses them strongly, especially against people traffickers.
The police have interviewed her, but no further action was taken.
The Metropolitan Police confirmed it had received allegations of incitement of racial hatred following an article published on 17th April and a 50-year-old woman was questioned.
“The Special Enquiry Team of the Homicide and Major Crime Command are investigating,” it said in a statement.
“On Thursday, 30 July, a 40-year-old woman attended a central London police station by appointment and was interviewed under caution. She was not arrested.”
The columnist appeared to equate men of Pakistani origin to child abusers in a series of posts on Twitter.
Her comments followed a lengthy argument with Danczuk on the social network about his decision to mark National Pakistan Day on 23 March in his constituency of Rochdale by raising the Pakistani flag for 30 minutes.
Hopkins claimed it was wrong to raise the flag in the constituency where, in 2012, nine men were jailed for their part in a paedophile ring. Eight of the men were of Pakistani origin.
I do not suppose the Independent Newspaper would employ her, but she will not be having sleepless nights over that.
To get back to my question regarding the video that I posted, what did she say that you disagree with?