• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Hey sis, how about a roll in the hay

icehorse

......unaffiliated...... anti-dogmatist
Premium Member
And if no coercion exists?

if we've assumed sterilization and no coercion, then it just seems icky, but i can't easily find the moral problem - other than "we've never allowed this". (which isn't really a moral reason)

but, perhaps there's a moral reason that would make me slap my forehead. but definitely icky.
 

Sapiens

Polymathematician
if we've assumed sterilization and no coercion, then it just seems icky, but i can't easily find the moral problem - other than "we've never allowed this". (which isn't really a moral reason)

but, perhaps there's a moral reason that would make me slap my forehead. but definitely icky.
Historically incest is kinda like nepotism ... it happens in the best of families.
 

Glaurung

Denizen of Niflheim
Sorry, but how do you know that it is "inherently wrong"?
The same way you 'know' that there is no such thing as a moral standard independent of human opinion. Because as a Christian I believe that such a standard is very real. I'm not here to prove it to you, nor am I here to enforce it on you.

Defend that view and not with "I'm just right so there"
Likewise.
 

Cephus

Relentlessly Rational
The same way you 'know' that there is no such thing as a moral standard independent of human opinion. Because as a Christian I believe that such a standard is very real. I'm not here to prove it to you, nor am I here to enforce it on you.

So you just believe it, you don't know it. Words have meanings for a reason.
 

Glaurung

Denizen of Niflheim
So you just believe it, you don't know it. Words have meanings for a reason.
I don't 'just' believe it. I didn't 'just' wake up one day and arbitrarily decide my convictions on a whim. The fact that you don't share my moral convictions is not in itself a meaningful argument for their baselessness. Not all of us hold to a framework of atheism and social relativism; you're just going to have to deal with that reality.
 

Nietzsche

The Last Prussian
Premium Member
The same way you 'know' that there is no such thing as a moral standard independent of human opinion. Because as a Christian I believe that such a standard is very real. I'm not here to prove it to you, nor am I here to enforce it on you.
If you can't show it, you don't know it. You strongly believe that this is the case, you cannot prove it, just as I cannot prove it in the opposite direction.
 
Top