-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Hillary Concedes At 2:30am EST!!!
- Thread starter Neo Deist
- Start date
Thanda
Well-Known Member
It's a good thing Trump spoke out about the rigging of the elections. Clearly the polls were rigged (and the democratic primaries).
There's never been a shred of evidence that the election was being rigged. It was more conspiracy theorist bull****. Trump's standard fare.
One of the first illegal immigrants, too!Look on the bright side...the new First Lady will be one of the best looking ones in the history of the White House.
Last edited:
I plead the fifth.Look on the bright side...the new First Lady will be one of the best looking ones in the history of the White House.
Thanda
Well-Known Member
I'm saying it was a good thing he spoke about it - or IOW he brought attention to it - because it was not outside the realm of possibility for the people who rigged the democratic election and the polls to attempt to rig the actual elections
You got any proof they would've? Beyond Alex Jones?
Thanda
Well-Known Member
Not any conclusive proof - just the fact that she, a seasoned, experienced and well known politician, struggled against a nobody (Bernie) and is now being trounced by the worst American presidential candidate in history. It makes sense to me that the only way she managed to get this far was that a lot of powerful people with vested interested did all they could (ethical or not) to get her in power.
We can easily say the opposite that a lot of powerful people with vested interest did(very unethically) all they could to keep her out of power.
Daemon Sophic
Avatar in flux
Are you using irony? Since both of your points would indicate the exact opposite of your proposition....and I'm up way after I should have been asleep.
Thanda
Well-Known Member
Nope they didn't - the wikileaks emails prove it (and the dead wrong "polls").
Thanda
Well-Known Member
Nope they don't. She has been around for a long time - she could have used that time to build a good reputation for herself. Had she done so she would have swept aside Bernie and Trump. Instead she accomplished nothing noteworthy other than involving America in more questionable wars and herself in more scandals. Despite this, and despite her clear unpopularity as shown by attendances to her rallies, the Democratic elite was absolutely determined to get her in power.
As for Donald Trump, everyday I checked the news there was one negative article about him after another. You hardly heard anything about Hillary. It was as if the Media was saying "Vote for Hillary because Trump is a really bad guy". And the polls were giving her all the momentum, punting her to win by a landslide (I remember she was supposed to be ahead by 15% in some polls). But she has instead been absolutely crushed.
Now do you think it was just an honest mistake from the pollsters? The polls are normally correct so why did they suddenly, in this election, because so hopelessly and pathetically wrong?
Wikileaks is part of the "powerful people with vested interest".
Thanda
Well-Known Member
Oh, you're one of those - yes, knock yourself out - its those pesky communists!
Just saying, you started with that kind of talk as if nothing hindered the dems.
Scuba Pete
Le plongeur avec attitude...
The USA has been lost to bigots and hatriots. It's a sad day, indeed. That's my take on this election.