• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

History of the Trinity Doctrine

outhouse

Atheistically
Q is patently Galilean and predates Mark by 30 years. Yes, Luke is Gentile. Matthew is Jewish, writing to an expatriate Jewish community.

I think Q is Galilean, because the outlying, more rural areas were far more suspicious of the Roman "Big Brother" than the urbanites were. Q is so suspicious. The remaining L and M material are not.


ill need sources for a Galilean connection, i dont even know whwere got that, being that most scholars view it as redacted from a greek source
 

F0uad

Well-Known Member
because paul was before the gospels does not mean they were influenced by them.

its obvious they were not, and follwoing other developing traditions
Not even John?

Well Paul was a Pharisee according to some scripture and he had a big Christian community following him according to Historians so the scriptures could easily be influenced by him maybe not personally but by hes teachings. You can't just jump from Matthew/Luke to John there has to be a development there.
 

sojourner

Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
Well you forget the notion that Pauline scriptures date back earlier then that of Mark what is considered to be the oldest gospel, we also know that Matthew and Luke used Mark's work so therefore i can conclude that all work have been influenced by Paul in a way.

Also there is no historical evidence that the gospels were written by Mark, Matthew, Luke or John since the writers used a 3rd person view on the stories and the titles clearly say ''According to'' and not ''By''.
None of that matters. Matthew and Luke both used an earlier source, probably oral, and probably from less than 10 years following the crucifixion. That's even earlier than Paul's letter to Thessalonica.
 

outhouse

Atheistically
Not even John?

Well Paul was a Pharisee according to some scripture and he had a big Christian community following him according to Historians so the scriptures could easily be influenced by him maybe not personally but by hes teachings. You can't just jump from Matthew/Luke to John there has to be a development there.


Gjohn was by a different sect, a johannine community that had their own influences.

paul wrote letters not a gospel, it took a while before they were is wide circulation
 
Top