• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Hitler's Wallet Dilemma

4consideration

*
Premium Member
That's not exactly where i was trying to get at.
For the sake of the discussion, imagine a situation where you think it would be right for the goverment to take money ( under those restrictions i mentioned in the last topic ) from a person for doing something, and wrong for a commoner to do it with this person.

Why do you consider it right for the government to do it, but not for the commoner? That's the question.
If you can't imagine this situation, say so.

OK. (I would likely argue against a lot of fines. I was able to come up with one, though.)

The local library is financed with local tax dollars. A person in the community may have a library card and may check out books/DVD's, etc. at no cost. However, the person must pay a fine if he/she keeps the book/DVD for longer than the established time-frame without renewing it.

In this case, it is acceptable to me for the city (or county) to apply a fine for an over-due item, even if I would not like to pay a fine. It a form of a punishment, or incentive for timely return, that a fine is imposed for late items. That practise keeps the books/DVD's available on a regular basis for others to enjoy. It is ok for the city/county to have the library collect these fines, because they are used as part of the cost of operating the library.

However, it would not be OK for me, personally, to attempt to collect a fine from another person, because I have nothing to do with the operation of the library -- except that I pay taxes and have benefit from the use of it (and have a moral obligation to respect its property, as public property.) I have no right to personal financial gain from the occurrence of another person keeping an item for an extended period of time.

If I were to take it upon myself to do such a thing, I may either deny the library the fines due to it if I take it for myself, or I may create an injustice of a situation where the other person is fined twice, by me and by the library. I see nothing about this scenario that would justify me (as an individual) applying a fine to another individual.
 

uberrobonomicon4000

Active Member
"You are in Berlin, 1933. Somehow, you find yourself in a position where you can effortlessly steal Hitler's wallet. This theft will not affect Hitler's rise to power, the nature of WW2, or the Holocaust. There is no important identification in the wallet, but the act will cost Hitler forty Reichsmarks and completely ruin his evening. You do not need the money. The odds that you will be caught committing this act are less than 2 percent. Are you, in your opinion, ethically obligated to steal Hitler's wallet?"
I would slap the stache off Hitler, take his wallet, then laugh in his face and ask if his oracle seen that **** coming.
 

TommyDar

Member
I think it falls into the category of being something that is neither right nor wrong, but is ultimately just a waste of time.
 
Top