Any designer has a signature through their handywork, artists, house designers etc. Our genetic code is Gods signature. That's probably why we share so many genes with all living creatures. Genes did not evolve themselves in graduations towards the human species. It's the code of life. It's the carbon based life form blueprint. Scientists are surprised that we share so many genes. This was not expected.
This is simply because all life forms share a common ancestor, therefore we are still going to have similar genetic code regardless of time.
I don't know about plants evolving into other species, but I'm convinced humans did not evolve but were created intelligent and fully human. No doubt our ancestors adapted to different environments. I still have not given up belief that humans were created 6,000 years ago. However if they were around longer, I still believe they were created human, in one hit. Yes, Neanderthal had a bigger brain and I think they could have been the biblical nephilim. That would fit. However, I have no faith in radiometric dating.
The
Nephilim (Hebrew:
נפלים, Nefilīm) were a race that came to dominate the antediluvian (pre-flood) world.
So the flood took place supposedly sometime around this period
"The first five books of the Old Testament (known as the Pentateuch or Torah) was written by Moses during the forty years that the children of Israel wandered in the wilderness (1450 - 1410 B.C.)."
However then Neanderthals only existed from 600,000 to 30,000 years ago
Though this is "preflood" this is WAY before god created man, the nephilim were the sons and daughters of the adam and eve. Your timeline does NOT fit.
Also Nephilim comes from the term Giants and Titans. However Neanderthals, although more robust than homosapiens stood 6 inches shorter than us.
Also Homo sapiens have been around from 200,000 years ago until present. So they werent created 6000 years ago, like you naively suggest.
Now this educated researcher accepts her results, obviously. She has no problem accepting that this homo florensensis hobbit specimen is from way back and evolved separate to humans. It proves to me that scientists have no idea what they are doing apart from trying their darndest to make it all fit and provide evidence for TOE. All these fossils are just apes, chimps, orangatangs etc. Humans did not evolve from apes. As easy as one would think it is to tell a chimp skull from a human skull they cannot. This hobbit is no where near human if 2 million years old. Obviously this researcher does not see any reason to believe her research is flawed. In her mind, with her knowledge she has no trouble accepting her results. So how morphologically different must a species just above sapiens be from something 2 millions years old.
If scientists were trying to prove creation they would much more easily accomplish it with the genetic evidence they have today. All this dilemma is because they are trying to prove something that did not happen. Hence all the confusion and debate. If they can't tell a species above homo sapiens from a creature 2 millions years old they can't tell us anything at all.
Homo florensis where found on an island of Flores in indonesia. Now basic genetics.
If a species is in a continously stable environment it will have no need to evolve as no other new genes will have a genetic intraspecific advantage over another.
Homo florensis:
and Homo Sapien:
I think a Chimp could tell them two apart. (no pun intended)
AUSTRALIAN research has thrown a question mark over long-held beliefs of human evolution thanks to never-before-tried technology on a set of "hobbit bones'' found in Indonesia.
Researchers based in Canberra and Wollongong set to work on a "hobbit'' skeleton found on the Indonesian island of Flores in 2004, using new cladistic analysis.
It compares the forms of organisms to determine ancestral relationships - the first time it was used on this set of homo floresiensis bones.
The results were surprising.
Anthropologist Debbie Argue concluded the bones diverged from the Homo sapiens evolutionary line nearly two million years ago, meaning that it did not share an immediate ancestor with modern humans.
Note the fact that the technology is new and WILL have bugs and be unreliable.
Also Birds are related to reptiles. The time-scale doesnt change the fact that they share an immediate ancestor with reptiles.
Furthermore just because it diverged before the evolution of neanderthals doesnt mean it could potentially evolve into something relatively similar to homo sapiens.
Lastly this evidence is flawed as Homoflorensis only existed in the period of 94,000 to 13,000 years ago.
Also you get branches from the Homo sapien descendary lines which still end up being homo sapiens.
Just because a species splits from a species doesnt mean it doesnt have the genetic potential to become the same thing.
If the Homo florensis survived long enough, it probably would have become a homo sapien.
and Homo Sapien:
