the prove my "opinions" wrong, you can't even do that. all you can do is sit and spin.
Okay... let's go back to some of your claims from the start of the thread, then.
Your first bit of evidence that attraction is not chosen is right here in this thread. You have statements from several people saying that they do not have the power to choose who they are attracted to. At the very least, this indicates that your claim, though it may be true for you, is not universally true.
Because, look at physical anatomy, Women and Men are different in thier structure, they are designed by nature to do a certian function together(procreation). why would it be natural to go against nature?
To claim "design", you must first establish intent, but I'm willing to set that point aside, because I don't think we'll get very far with it.
That aside, there are plenty of examples of behaviour where we deviate from what is "natural": we are born with a certain hair colour, and many people dye it... even to unnatural colours; our species has a history of being omnivores, but some choose to be vegetarian; we are born with the natural ability to walk upright, but many people choose to use automobiles to get around... it seems that what is "natural" isn't generally considered to be a criterion for whether something is good or bad. Why do you think it should be in this case?
a man and a man cannot make new life
just as a woman and a woman cannot make new life
While trivially true, I don't think this statement says anything for whether or not sexual attraction is a choice.
Number 2 i was using those things as a comparasin of urges and choice. all urges depend on choice to be put into action, Nomatter what.
Yes, but it seems you're claiming that urges are voluntary as well.
Number 3 The babies could very possibly come from single mothers, but the creation of that babie require and MAN+WOMAN to create, even in the case of artificial insemination, parts came from a MALE , and were placed into a FEMALE to create said baby.
Artificial insemination has nothing to do with attraction, and is therefore irrelevant to your main claim.
Number 4 Marriage has been around since the dawn of time. wiether you want to go the creation, or the evolution route. If Adam was gay, we wouldn't be here. If cavemen were gay, we wouldn't be here.
If one caveman in ten were gay, there'd be no problem at all in getting here. Anyhow, it's irrelevant to whether sexual attraction is a choice.
if youw ant to go down that road fine, Yes, there are homosexual acts in the animal kingdom, (male dogs humping other male dogs ect... which are acts of dominance) how does that pertain to Humans? even so, it's the dog's choice to hump the other dog.
It may be the dog's choice to "hump", but it's not the dog's choice to have the desire to hump in the first place.
from what you've been told. ever notice how a "feeling"
is a matter of choice or opinion?
A question, not a statement of opinion, but no, I haven't noticed that.
not a choice, sure put it up here,
cause nomatter what science says i'm right on this followign statement :
It's is always a choice to make any action. to follow through with an urge, it is always a choice. It's a choice to be Hetrosexual. It's always a choice. choices are made every day. Nobody twists your arm into being straight or gay.
Actions are choices. Feelings, urges and attractions are not. Choice only comes into play when we decide whether to act on those feelings.
