Homosexuality is not moral

[Meow Mix]

True to an extent, but that doesn't seem to be the main reason why lesbianism has been looked down upon (when attention is paid to it in the first place). It seems to go back to violating cultural views of masculinity and femininity from what I can tell from the historical evidence.

This.

Also lesbians have long been fetishized as existing for the male gaze, insultingly. Perhaps less so anymore, but it’s still a thing.

 

[Kooky]

Your missing the point. Anyways...

I would assume if a gay man got a woman pregnant, or vice versa, he or she would be regarded as notably less gay I think. I think bisexual would be more accurate.

I think you are making presumptions that are perhaps not clear to you. There are many possible instances where a person would be required to have sex with a partner they were not attracted to.

Historically, before the sexual revolution of the 1960s in the West, most homosexual men and women would be trapped in loveless marriages where they were required to 'perform' and produce heirs in spite of their lack of sexual attraction towards their partners. Even among heterosexual men and women, consent to sexual relations was considered largely optional for a substantial portion of recorded human history.

 

[InChrist]

It's weird how Yahweh made us, but then punishes us when we act like humans.

Is it weird that manufacturers include instructions with their products warning of misuse which causes damage? God created humans to function a certain way. Behavior that is contrary is misuse and damaging.

 

[night912]

That would be interested we get to a period where people can get to a place where procreation does not need to be limited to the bounds of romantic/biological attraction.

If society needed to survive by procreation, why would one's sexual orientation be a problem IF both parties agreed there's no love involved.

For example, my friend always wanted to have children. She still had sex with her friend to have the child but they were in agreement that it wasn't for anything else. He's in the children's lives, has his own wife, and they all don't treat each other different despite the scenario.

Makes me think of Star Trek... how did they work things out on Vulcan during Amok Time.

By using Vulcan logic.

 

[Twilight Hue]

I think you are making presumptions that are perhaps not clear to you. There are many possible instances where a person would be required to have sex with a partner they were not attracted to.

Historically, before the sexual revolution of the 1960s in the West, most homosexual men and women would be trapped in loveless marriages where they were required to 'perform' and produce heirs in spite of their lack of sexual attraction towards their partners. Even among heterosexual men and women, consent to sexual relations was considered largely optional for a substantial portion of recorded human history.

No matter how you slice it. You still need a man and a woman at the end.

 

[Sand Dancer]

Is it weird that manufacturers include instructions with their products warning of misuse which causes damage? God created humans to function a certain way. Behavior that is contrary is misuse and damaging.

He should have just made us to be mindless robots, so we wouldn't have to go to hell for showing independent thought.

 

[Martin]

Homosexuality is fine. Get a life.

 

[Audie]

This.

Also lesbians have long been fetishized as existing for the male gaze, insultingly. Perhaps less so anymore, but it’s still a thing.

Men think everything is about them

 

[Audie]

According to the scriptures, homosexuality is a sin and is outside of the Creator God’s design for human beings.

Scrip also says Noah's ark and Jesus is a sheep.
The Moslems say I will hang by my hair in eternal fire for letting men see my hair uncovered in public.
Count me totally unimpressed.

I will live with my gf and wear my hair as please.

 

[MonkeyFire]

Homosexuality is amoral
Murder is a moral
Homosexuality is like being a murderer?
no that would be the sadist Christians.

 

[metis]

No matter how you slice it. You still need a man and a woman at the end.

Do you actually think that most sex is just to have children?

 

[night912]

No matter how you slice it. You still need a man and a woman at the end.

I'm a man and you're telling me that at the end, I need be threesome with a man and woman? So why are you in favor of a man being bisexual but not homosexual?

No matter how you slice it, at the end a heterosexual man and a homosexual man are the same when it comes to being biologically efficient. They both cannot get pregnant.