You must have mistaken me for someone else.
Meantime, I see lots of words, I don't see any quotes.
What an odd thing to say. I see lots of quotes almost every post has one in this thread.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
You must have mistaken me for someone else.
Meantime, I see lots of words, I don't see any quotes.
I have noted the similarity in the behavior of polar opposites for years. One, maybe two, remind me of opinions. However, in regards to Trump, I am going to subjectively favor those that are on the correct side.Tis fascinating how pro-Trumpettes sound just like anti-Trumpettes.
The only difference is the direction of their epithets.
Playing at being willfully obtuse isn't producing quotes from the Mueller report saying what you claim it says, but don't let me stop you digging that hole.What an odd thing to say. I see lots of quotes almost every post has one in this thread.
One of them is correct?I have noted the similarity in the behavior of polar opposites for years. One, maybe two, remind me of opinions. However, in regards to Trump, I am going to subjectively favor those that are on the correct side.
Playing at being willfully obtuse isn't producing quotes from the Mueller report saying what you claim it says, but don't let me stop you digging that hole.
At no point in that video does Jim Jordan quote the Mueller Report. Thank you very much for wasting 5 minutes of my time.Here you can watch senators discuss it in Congress.
At no point in that video does Jim Jordan quote the Mueller Report. Thank you very much for wasting 5 minutes of my time.
Have you actually read the Mueller report for yourself? If not, you should.
Did you expect anything else? That's Usual Suspect 101, make a ridiculous claim, then provide a link, any link at all, and feign indignation when people won't click it, right up until the point someone DOES click it, and confirms that the link doesn't remotely support the earlier claim, or even tangentially relate to it in most cases, at which point the Usual Suspect will employ a new dodge, but absolutely will not under any circumstances acknowledge that their link was bogus, indeed, in most cases they'll refuse to even engage with any mention of the link or earlier claim again.At no point in that video does Jim Jordan quote the Mueller Report. Thank you very much for wasting 5 minutes of my time.
No, it is you who don’t understand law. Congress has full privileges to see high security, unredacted reports.Obviously you don't understand law. Barr cannot produce the unredacted report because unredacted it has grand jury testimony on it. This is illegal for Barr to do.
Good! I’m glad that you are fully onboard with release of the completely unredacted report to Congress as allowed by the law.You are correct about that. The former Democratic President abused his power to help his fellow Democratic Presidtial campaign nominee (Hillary) by spying on her competition (Trump) illegally. Then because they lost the election, and not able to cover it up, tried to use the sitting President as a patsy to cover their own conspiracy and the breaking of many civil rights. Further made worse by Congress for instructing A.G. Barr to commit a felony by releasing unredacted grand jury testimony, then threatening him with contempt for refusing to break the law, which is obstruction of justice.
There is a crisis alright. The evidence in the Mueller report list every bit of it as well.
Very good. So now there is legal precedent. All the better to make the process go .......smoothly.BREAKING NEWS!!!!
Attorney General Eric Holder held in contempt of Congress
See the following article for this breaking news.
Holder held in contempt
Opps my bad it isn't 2012 is it?
Congress has full privileges to see high security, unredacted reports.
Good! I’m glad that you are fully onboard with release of the completely unredacted report to Congress as allowed by the law.
When you put it like that, it makes it too difficult for me to come up with something, especially when I am in such strong agreement with your latter statement.One of them is correct?
I'd think that blind faith in or blind opposition to him would both be failed perspectives.
I really never saw myself as a libertarian, though I must recognize some affinity.
Perhaps. I am still either unconvinced or in some kind of denial. Not sure which.
Then just tell me what he says. Give me just one sentence that comes out of his mouth in that video that is a quote from the Mueller Report. That should not be too hard.You didn't watch it then. Because around 45 seconds in he starts to talk about it then continues it throughout the rest of the video.
I get it honesty is not your forte'. But you can't bluff you way out of something when the facts is in front of everyone clearly to see.
Then just tell me what he says. Give me just one sentence that comes out of his mouth in that video that is a quote from the Mueller Report. That should not be too hard.
An affinity is wonderful.Perhaps. I am still either unconvinced or in some kind of denial. Not sure which.
That second clip reminded me of a dream I have had, except mine had several Elvises (Elvi? What is the plural of Elvis?) in it. What is that from?
Have you read the book "The Science of Liberty" by Timothy Ferris? It was within those pages that my libertarian affinity first came to my attention.
Looking back, I have a number of noteworthy ancestors that could probably be said to have an affinity for liberty as well.An affinity is wonderful.
No need to go full blown libertarian for me.
If you serve the three B's, it may be all over for my reticence.An affinity is wonderful.
No need to go full blown libertarian for me.
The last one I went to was at a bar.Looking back, I have a number of noteworthy ancestors that could probably be said to have an affinity for liberty as well.
Who knows, I try to maintain an open mind and you never know where life may lead. There were some other other affinities identified as well. Some equally surprising and some pretty much expected. It is difficult to say how valid such tests are and whether anything they report is meaningful. Still, it is more where I was placed in the libertarian camp and not really a surprise for the known affinity.
What do you guys serve at meetings?