• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

How are these Great Beings explained?

Unveiled Artist

Veteran Member
1. If a hindu and christian met each other and said they both believe in god then debate whose god is right, at the end of the day, each has his own belief.

2.If a hindu and bahai met each other and said they both believe in god then debate whose god is right, at the end of the day, you would think each has his own belief.

They dont.

3. The moment you say "Christ predicted the coming of bahaullah" and the christian corrects the bahai in scriptire and belief,

This is no longer differences of belief and debate.

That bahai just oversteped the others boundaries by the nature of what he believes. Of coursenthey respext each other as people

And

Its just wrong for any belief system to have mutiple conflicting beliefs regardless the goal and regardless if god is the source.

No oil and water no matter how beautiful you paint the jug
 

loverofhumanity

We are all the leaves of one tree
Premium Member
[ Quote ]
I read everything you said. I dont believe in god so this is purely an objective point of view (and I can only go by what you all posts since you have many sacred text and academic articles)

So you're an outsider too, commenting? Hmmmm


Peace

1. Peace can only happen when everyone agrees with each other. Since your foundation is god, there can be no peace

Baha'is are told to strive for unanimity but the majority is still the voice of God. The Veto is proof pure unanimity can backfire. Since when has believing in God become a prerequisite for peace? No democracy could function on unanimity.

2. Peace looks not only at similarities but does not try to compromise our differences of another persons religion.

Therefore, if you and I were to develop peace as you defined, I would either A. Have to believe in god or B. You do not believe in god. The common foundation in your faith is god. Without god, how can you relate to any religion you want to have peace with.

Again. Whoever said belief in God was a prerequisite to peace? There is no such law.

Goals

1. Your goals are fine. Im not saying they are wrong. Its about the other stuff.

I must pinch myself. Did we actually pass the goal test?

1. Since Buddhism talks nothing about a creator, how can he be a part of your religion? Not from your perspective but from a buddhist.

Many Buddhists have become Baha'is so it might have something to do with Buddhist prophecies. When I was in Burma, Buddhists were very aware that a Buddha was due and loved the Writings of Baha'u'llah.

2. Hinduism has more than one god. Vishnu is one of three creators. Krishna is a god too and incarnation. Your religion incorporates Krishna.

Yes I know. We believe in Krishna but not as God.

3. What I was interested in, Lukumi African religion has only one god/creator. There are other one-creator religions.

It sounds very interesting.

1. Christianity has an image of god (probably the only creator-religion that does represent god in physical form)

In the Bible it says God is Spirit and to worship Him in spirit.

24 God is spirit, and his worshipers must worship in the Spirit and in truth.”


2. Wait. It makes more sense from your point of view if god sent The Buddha. The Buddha cant talk about something he is ignorant to. Thats illogical not only religiously but realistically.

Buddha did refer to an 'unborn an uncreated'. He could have meant God. We believe He did.


You said throw away traditions etc posts back. Pages back. Its one thing to look at someone elses water across the see, a whole nother to swim in their water with the goal to save people you think are drowning even though you dont own the land and water your in.

Throw away? I love traditions, customs and culture so I was probably meaning things like Holy War or superstitions.

1. I wish other religious can reply to this. If it is true, it has to be in their belief system.

2. If its just your belief, using other religious founders is an insult unless they agree

I can show you all the verse numbers and passages of the Holy Books if you don't believe me. They are definitely there.

1. Mutual agreement if making world peace requires compromise. Its not a one-way situation. Thats why there is no world peace. No one wants to compromise their beliefs.

World peace hasn't worked because man doesn't have thr wisdom to know how to do it. He's tried his ways and only created ware. It's time to step aside and give God's ways a go.

Because we exist way before the founders (those you acknowledge) existed. His existence isnt a cure for peace. Its between people living now, today. The only few things off about bahai is the interpreting of other religions. Your goal and beliefs are yours only.

Thats like two married people arguing and you, way out of nowhere from another country tell us about god, founders, and how they are there to fix our problems rather than asking us.

It's more like a patient on his death need and an All Knowing Physician turns up with th cure. You'd have to be crazy to refuse treatment.

1. This is your belief. Do you see how you are using other religjons within your own?

2. Why dont you take other peoples faith and correction into consideration if you want to say these religions exist in yours?

That is not world peace. Thats you vs. Them. Change your perspective, then you can see my point of view.

The current religions have had enough time to bring peace. We've had war after war with almost no respite. They've had two chances to destroy humanity and I don't think God, in His wisdom and compassion wants to allow them to nuke ourselves into oblivion so my understanding is He's making changes and raising up a generation of people that won't compromise on love but spread it all over the world.

What happened to all the religions that were supposed to spread love and justice all over the world? They ended up going to war against each other. Th crusades, the Inquisition. So many needless wars. Do we need religion if wars are thr result?


Bahaullah isnt god. What does god say on this?

The word 'Say' means God is telling Baha'u'llah to say that He, God, is the One that does whatever He wants with His creation and He direst want war anymore but peace.



You vs. Them perspective.

If god respected his creatiom, he would let them build world peace among their given TLCs. Without that, that is not world peace...

We've had our chance and blown it.

No matter how you turn it.[/QUOTE][ /Quote ]
 
Last edited:

Vinayaka

devotee
Premium Member
[ Quote ]

Many Buddhists have become Baha'is so it might have something to do with Buddhist prophecies. When I was in Burma, Buddhists were very aware that a Buddha was due and loved the Writings of Baha'u'llah.

Yes I know. We believe in Krishna but not as God.

The current religions have had enough time to bring peace. We've had war after war with almost no respite. They've had two chances to destroy humanity and I don't think God, in His wisdom and compassion wants to allow them to nuke ourselves into oblivion so my understanding is He's making changes and raising up a generation of people that won't compromise on love but spread it all over the world.
[ /Quote ][/QUOTE]

You have some evidence for Buddhists becoming Bahai?
There are also many ex-Bahais.

No Hindu agrees with you on Krishna. This is just plain disrespect to Hindus. Do you see me claiming false stuff about Bahai?

(I looked at some original stuff from your prophet, and he actually had little to say about Hinduism at all, humbly admitting he didn't know much. So all this false stuff has come later, from projection of one paradigm into another.

Hinduism has gone on without war for a very long time. Most violence in Hinduism was caused by outsiders, like all the Muslim invasions and attempted genocide, the British 'divide and rule' policies. We are a religion of peace, ahimsa being a central tenet.
 

loverofhumanity

We are all the leaves of one tree
Premium Member
1. If a hindu and christian met each other and said they both believe in god then debate whose god is right, at the end of the day, each has his own belief.

2.If a hindu and bahai met each other and said they both believe in god then debate whose god is right, at the end of the day, you would think each has his own belief.

They dont.

3. The moment you say "Christ predicted the coming of bahaullah" and the christian corrects the bahai in scriptire and belief,

This is no longer differences of belief and debate.

That bahai just oversteped the others boundaries by the nature of what he believes. Of coursenthey respext each other as people

And

Its just wrong for any belief system to have mutiple conflicting beliefs regardless the goal and regardless if god is the source.

No oil and water no matter how beautiful you paint the jug

The Baha'i is only telling the Christian that Christ has returned, information they will unlikely get from their leaders.

I investigated for myself and found it the be true.
 

loverofhumanity

We are all the leaves of one tree
Premium Member
[ /Quote ]

You have some evidence for Buddhists becoming Bahai?
There are also many ex-Bahais.

No Hindu agrees with you on Krishna. This is just plain disrespect to Hindus. Do you see me claiming false stuff about Bahai?

(I looked at some original stuff from your prophet, and he actually had little to say about Hinduism at all, humbly admitting he didn't know much. So all this false stuff has come later, from projection of one paradigm into another.

Hinduism has gone on without war for a very long time. Most violence in Hinduism was caused by outsiders, like all the Muslim invasions and attempted genocide, the British 'divide and rule' policies. We are a religion of peace, ahimsa being a central tenet.[/QUOTE]

In all Buddhist and Hindu countries there are many Baha'is from that background just like in Christian and Muslim nations.

Better then I refrain from saying anything more about Krishna. But any knowledgeable Indian Bahá'í would be able to explain our views more clearly as He would have grown up with Hinduism.

Baha'u'llah was not in contact with Hindu or Buddhist people as He appeared in Persia so mostly Muslim, Christian, Zoroastrianism and Jews would have been the ones asking questions.

Ahimsa is a very great spiritual principle which we fully support.

We can work with any religion which is peaceful and do. What is needed is for the principle of ahimsa to become part of all humanity.
 

Vinayaka

devotee
Premium Member
We can work with any religion which is peaceful and do. What is needed is for the principle of ahimsa to become part of all humanity.

But this contradicts any need for Bahalullah. The message of peace has legitimately been present in Sanatana Dharma for a very long time, far before. So together we can spread the message of ahimsa. Surely one doesn't need to become a Bahai or believe in Bahalullah for that. For example, in many versions of Hinduism, vegetarianism (a solid practice of ahimsa) is required. In Bahai it's optional.

I would argue that Sanatana Dharma offers up a much better approach to world peace than Bahai, mainly because we don't falsely interpret other religions to create disharmony. India has been a safe haven for persecuted faiths for a very long time. Everyone is welcome to go to the Mother and feel safe. You don't find persecutions of Bahai in India. The Dalai Lama seeking safe haven was another striking example.
 

Vinayaka

devotee
Premium Member
My original post lists them as:

Buddha, Moses, Krishna, Christ, Zoroaster, Muhammad, the Bab & Bahaullah.


You misunderstood my question. I thought you were saying it applied to only those Hindu sects that agreed to the avatara concept. But you were saying all Hindus agreed to it, which was false.
 

loverofhumanity

We are all the leaves of one tree
Premium Member
You misunderstood my question. I thought you were saying it applied to only those Hindu sects that agreed to the avatara concept. But you were saying all Hindus agreed to it, which was false.

I'm clear that all Hindus don't accept the Avatar concept and only mean those who do.
 

loverofhumanity

We are all the leaves of one tree
Premium Member
But this contradicts any need for Bahalullah. The message of peace has legitimately been present in Sanatana Dharma for a very long time, far before. So together we can spread the message of ahimsa. Surely one doesn't need to become a Bahai or believe in Bahalullah for that. For example, in many versions of Hinduism, vegetarianism (a solid practice of ahimsa) is required. In Bahai it's optional.

I would argue that Sanatana Dharma offers up a much better approach to world peace than Bahai, mainly because we don't falsely interpret other religions to create disharmony. India has been a safe haven for persecuted faiths for a very long time. Everyone is welcome to go to the Mother and feel safe. You don't find persecutions of Bahai in India. The Dalai Lama seeking safe haven was another striking example.

It is not a requirement of world peace for people to all be the one Faith. What is really needed is the spirit of Ahimsa. You have been practising it for far longer than us so we have a lot to learn from you.

Really, if we are serving humanity, and selflessly helping others we are all Hindus. Our aims are service to humanity and bringing peace to the world. That makes us Hindus just like you.

If you are living selflessly and performing your actions selflessly, you are a Hindu. If you are helping others, you are a Hindu. If you are living for God, in the service of God and offering your actions, you are Hindu. If you participate in any manner in God's eternal sacrifice called creation, you are a Hindu.

Why is Hinduism Called Sanatana Dharma?

And this

It makes no difference whether you have ever heard of Bahá’u’lláh or not, the man who lives the life according to the teachings of Bahá’u’lláh is already a Bahá’í. -Abdul-Bahá'í

I really believe if our motive is peace for all and to serve humanity selflessly then we are all one.

 

Vinayaka

devotee
Premium Member
Really, if we are serving humanity, and selflessly helping others we are all Hindus. Our aims are service to humanity and bringing peace to the world. That makes us Hindus just like you.

Trust me. You are most definitely not Hindu. I say this because of belief. For two starters, Bahai don't believe in reincarnation, and feel the need for prophets or manifestations. Those are far far away from Hindu beliefs.
 

loverofhumanity

We are all the leaves of one tree
Premium Member
For today at least. Not sure about tomorrow.

Thanks to you purely I'm getting it drummed into me. I really owe you much thanks for helping me to learn more and especially for your awesome patience.

I'm still grappling with Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva. They are all gods to Hindus right? Or gods of each sect? So you would believe in Shiva but not Vishnu right? What about Brahma which some believe is a personal God right? And Brahman is the power behind the universe? We would term it all as just -God.
 

loverofhumanity

We are all the leaves of one tree
Premium Member
Trust me. You are most definitely not Hindu. I say this because of belief. For two starters, Bahai don't believe in reincarnation, and feel the need for prophets or manifestations. Those are far far away from Hindu beliefs.

We don't believe in reincarnation into another physical body but do believe we receive a new spiritual body in the next world.

But doesn't Vaisnavism believe in Avatars and are waiting for Kalki? To us Avatar is the same as Prophet just different terminology.
 
Top