Maybe creationists look to the incredible amount of things that needed to be in situ for life to have started and flourished. The building blocks for life are scattered throughout the universe. How amazing that the earth is situated right where it is in relation to the sun, the atmosphere and ozone layer being just what we need, the amazing factory within a single cell, protection from asteroids that Jupiter affords so that life can proliferate, the seasons, the rain. Those building blocks were able to do their thing on earth unlike other planets. So far only earth has managed to produce a beautiful creation. Mankind is so incredibly fortunate to have had all this in place. Then there are articles such as the ones pasted below. So it seems that some scientists question the validity of ToE. This does not prove creation, but it allows room for doubt. Its not really that hard to believe some higher intelligence may be behind it all.
　
Molecular biologists and researchers at the Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona (UAB) Department of Genetics and Microbiology, in Spain, have recently called into question the established belief that the earliest life forms on the planet appeared from self-catalytic molecules. They say that these structures are unable of Darwinian evolution, and propose that a new explanation needs to be sought out for shedding light on the origins of the huge diversity for life on our planet,
AlphaGalileo reports.
AND....
A Review Of
The Case Against A Darwinian Origin Of Protein Folds By Douglas Axe, Bio-Complexity, Issue 1, pp. 1-12
Proteins adopt a higher order structure (eg: alpha helices and beta sheets) that define their functional domains. Years ago Michael Denton and Craig Marshall reviewed this higher structural order in proteins and proposed that protein folding patterns could be classified into a finite number of discrete families whose construction might be constrained by a set of underlying natural laws (1). In his latest critique Biologic Institute molecular biologist Douglas Axe has raised the ever-pertinent question of whether Darwinian evolution can adequately explain the origins of protein structure folds given the vast search space of possible protein sequence combinations that exist for moderately large proteins, say 300 amino acids in length. To begin Axe introduces his readers to the sampling problem. That is, given the postulated maximum number of distinct physical events that could have occurred since the universe began (10150) we cannot surmise that evolution has had enough time to find the 10390 possible amino-acid combinations of a 300 amino acid long protein.
