Father Heathen
Veteran Member
Only God is "Eternal".
Father Heathen, eat the fish and throw away the bones, leave the other thing in the latrine.
Do you get your jollies by being nasty on a religious forum?
It was a valid and fitting analogy.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Only God is "Eternal".
Father Heathen, eat the fish and throw away the bones, leave the other thing in the latrine.
Do you get your jollies by being nasty on a religious forum?
Are you comparing burning in a fiery pit for eternity to a "time out" in the corner?
The right of "first refusal" belongs to you! Seems to me you chose not to accept his love.
Go Figure?
You seem to have mastered the "false analogy" fallacy.
Why do you say that?
You have chosen your bed! Don't blame some one for your choices and call them something that they are not.I don't appreciate, like or entertain ultimatums, be it from "God," Jesus or anyone else.
Is sinning against an infinite God enough to warrant infinite punishment?
Is there actually an infinite punishment?
Is hell really just the absence of God's presence?
All good questions that need to be answered before we can even begin to judge God, if such a thing were even logical...
Because I never said nor inferred that hell is a way that God shows love, but that the reality of hell doesn't discount God's benevolence.
Your question is set up in such a way to make your argument. If your god in this thread were really the Abrahamic God, you would include his other attributes such as being infinitely just. How can you reconcile his justness with his goodness? That is a hard question to answer, but skipping it just makes the following questions meaningless.
Because I never said nor inferred that hell is a way that God shows love, but that the reality of hell doesn't discount God's benevolence.
Your question is set up in such a way to make your argument. If your god in this thread were really the Abrahamic God, you would include his other attributes such as being infinitely just. How can you reconcile his justness with his goodness? That is a hard question to answer, but skipping it just makes the following questions meaningless.
Because he isn't just. How is torturing someone forever remotely just?
Fair enough. But God's benevolence is not the issue. The issue is whether God could both unconditionally love people and also condemn them to hell.
How do you reconcile God's justice with his allegedly unconditional love?
You have chosen your bed! Don't blame some one for your choices and call them something that they are not.
Before I can answer that, I'd like to see what verse you're using (if there even is one) to form your interpretation of God.
No verse. I'm just going on the common notion that the Abrahamic god unconditionally loves his creation, including people.
There is "No" eternal everburning hell! This is from the Greek phylosphy and tales.Because he isn't just. How is torturing someone forever remotely just?
To compare God to a saddistic heathen father is just dopey.Do children who suffer cigarette burns as punishment for petty things "choose their bed"?
There is "No" eternal everburning hell! This is from the Greek phylosphy and tales.
The NT tells of a final cleansing of the earth by fire and all who are not protected by God will be burned up, if you have chosen not to be among those protected, you then will be but, ashes.
No loving father would create a condition to burn, reconstruct to burn again, reconstruct to burn again. Ever burnibg hell is the invention of mean, nasty and intolerant man.
If I leave my property to some one, it will be to some one who clearly cares for me.
If I leave out of my will the children who hate me, if this makes me a conditional lover! So be it. Call it whatever. But God has given you nothing that deserves this type of foul mouthing.