Then should anyone who wants to buy and own a gun have to get a mental health screening before they are allowed to have it? Would you agree to that?The point is that mentally healthy people dont commit mass violence.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Then should anyone who wants to buy and own a gun have to get a mental health screening before they are allowed to have it? Would you agree to that?The point is that mentally healthy people dont commit mass violence.
I do accept that evidence was presented to a grand jury, who indicted him. I do agree that the grand jury who indicted him might be better informed about the matter than me; in fact, it is certain that they are better informed, at this point.@Unfettered I mistakenly replied to the wrong post. It happens. This response is to you.
In the meantime, can you accept that what evidence is available was presented to a grand jury, which returned a True Indictment on the following:
one count of conspiracy to defraud the United Statesone count of conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding one count of obstruction of and attempt to obstruct an official proceedingone count of conspiracy against rightsCan you also accept that the grand jury, guided by the legal minds available to them about what those charges entail and how the evidence applies, might be better informed about the matter than you are?
And can you also accept that those charges, if true, should be considered more serious in a sitting President (and he was a sitting President at the time) than in many other people, given the responsibilities of his office and the oath that he took, and given the nature of the "official proceeding" in question?
Are you under the impression that other countries don't also have a lot of citizens suffering from mental health issues?Yes this is a good illustration of left rhetoric damaging society.
Of course. There was no violence before guns after all, and today nobody is ever beaten, stabbed, strangled, run down...
You arent making the point you think you are. Argue that mentally healthy people murder others or don't waste our time.Are you under the impression that other countries don't also have a lot of citizens suffering from mental health issues?
How come the rest of us don't have anywhere near as many mass shootings as the US does, if it's just all about "mental health?"
I'll give you a hint: It's the guns!
The fact that you avoided answering my questions and didn't address anything I said demonstrates otherwise, I think.You arent making the point you think you are.
I already wasted my time asking questions that you didn't answer.Argue that mentally healthy people murder others or don't waste our time.
Because it is so utterly hypocritical, especially in light of the fact that numerous present and former Pubs basically compare the Pubs to a nasty dumpster fire.What is bizarre about it?
Even mentally healthy people are notoriously prone for emotional outbursts, some of them more extreme such as "going postal."You arent making the point you think you are. Argue that mentally healthy people murder others or don't waste our time.
What a strange view of mental health.Even mentally healthy people are notoriously prone for emotional outbursts, some of them more extreme such as "going postal."
What question? You refuse to acknowledge that mental illness is the cause not guns, thus buying into political nonsense and doing more harm than good.The fact that you avoided answering my questions and didn't address anything I said demonstrates otherwise, I think.
I already wasted my time asking questions that you didn't answer.
... what?Because it is so utterly hypocritical, especially in light of the fact that numerous present and former Pubs basically compare the Pubs to a nasty dumpster fire.
Oh he's a traitor, twice at least, once to the constitution, with all that Jan 5th nonsense and once to the nation, for being Vladimir Putin's consistently bestest boy.For that is what Trump is, if John Kelly is not lying. It is difficult to believe that a former general will be lying about this. Its hard to call anyone who holds the views Trump has as anything but a traitor.
If we're talking about Donald Trump, I don't believe he has done anything traitorous. I think he's done some foolish and juvenile things, but not traitorous.
Anger, even rage, is a perfectly normal part of human psychology.What a strange view of mental health.
It's "alleged"; "supposed." Did it happen? Also, do you know that the act itself is treason? Asking, since you seem to be asserting.Trump allegedly discussed US nuclear subs with foreign national after leaving White House: Sources
Months after leaving office, former President Trump allegedly discussed potentially sensitive info about U.S. nuclear subs with an Australian billionaire, say sources.abcnews.go.com
It's "alleged"; "supposed." Did it happen? Also, do you know that the act itself is treason? Asking, since you seem to be asserting.
Of course. These don't equate to murderous action.Anger, even rage, is a perfectly normal part of human psychology.
You seem to be trying to assert that "mental illness" is the only motive for murder. Not money, not property, not jealousy, not revenge -- not even love (which tragically is all too often a very real motive).Of course. These don't equate to murderous action.
Thank you. So charged for disclosing the sub info, but not convicted at this point. And not treason. Didn't think there was any way it was treason; definition is very narrow.Prosecutors and the FBI interviewed him twice, I'm fairly confident they have the receipts.
And no, not treasonous by the Constitutional definition, which clearly defines the parameters. The closest he could come to that would be if it was proved there was intent to overthrow the government, and we haven't gotten to that trial yet, and plus they only charged him with high crimes and misdemeanors.
Thank you. So charged for disclosing the sub info, but not convicted at this point.
And not treason. Didn't think there was any way it was treason; definition is very narrow.
Either way, Mr. Trump's lack of discipline is one of the reasons I couldn't vote for him. He's too predictably unpredictable; not the kind of person you want with sensitive information and such.