I never suggested they were symbolic.
But you don't believe that they are literal. Isn't that taking them as symbolism?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I never suggested they were symbolic.
In John 21 until I come was referring to Jesus in the present time, not to coming back to earth later.Jesus told the apostle Peter if I want him to love until I come, what is that to you, in John 21.
What do you believe the context of those verses is?
What ever gave you the idea that Jesus was coming back to earth again?
Jesus never said he was going to return to earth, not once in the entire New Testament.
No, I just don't believe the bodily resurrection ever happened although the miracles might have happened.But you don't believe that they are literal. Isn't that taking them as symbolism?
In John 21 until I come was referring to Jesus in the present time, not to coming back to earth later.
I believe Daniel 7 is referring to Baha'u'llah -- one like the Son of Man.Daniel 7 talks about one like the Son of Man coming on the clouds. Jesus was telling Pontius Pilate why he was not resisting arrest.
No, I just don't believe the bodily resurrection ever happened although the miracles might have happened.
I believe Daniel 7 is referring to Baha'u'llah -- one like the Son of Man.
Okay, what is the better interpretation of the "he"? Is it "they" like some of the other translations? Then, what is the context of this one verse. How do Jews interpret it? Hmmm? Who could we ask? I know... why not a Jew?
Christians and Baha'is both take one verse and make it into a prophecy. With Christians a big one is Isaiah 7:14, yet they ignore the rest of the verses. With Baha'is this one from Micah 7:12 is used a lot. In context, how do Jews interpret this verse?
1260 lunar years to 1844.
Where in the Baha'i writings does it suggest that the resurrection was anything but symbolic?I never suggested they were symbolic.
And yet you fail to answer the question. What does 457BC have to do with the sacrifice being stopped and all the rest of the stuff. So why does the 2300 years start there? Then we have this...The year AH1260 is AD1844.
Plain and simple.
Regards Tony
So we have 70AD and 132AD... but Baha'is don't start counting the 1260 years from either one.
Then Baha'is go on to count all the other references that can be transformed into 1260 years start and stop in the same years, even though the things being talked about, like the Umayyads and Abbasids, didn't begin or end in those years. Why? Yes, it is very plain and very simple. Those are the only dates that work for Baha'is, so they make everything start in 621AD, so everything can end in 1844. One thing for sure, Baha'is shouldn't use prophecies as any kind of proof. They should stick with Baha'u'llah's life and his writings... But then, who came up with these fulfilled "prophecies"? I know Bill Sears and I think Abdul Baha' too. Who else found all these Bible prophecies that supposedly were fulfilled by Baha'u'llah?So Muslims conquered it in 637AD... but that's not where Baha'is start counting the 1260 years either. No, Baha'i start in 621AD the year of the Hegira and the start of the Islamic calendar. Why? Other than it's the one that gets 1260 lunar years to 1844.
Sorry if I don't trust any religious person's interpretations of "prophecies" fulfilled. Two gospels put Mary and Joseph in Bethlehem. Both were written long after Jesus was born. Then, like I asked you before, Matthew has Jesus going to Egypt and Luke has him going back to Nazareth. You trust it and believe it. I have my concerns.Micah 5:2 refers to the Messiah being from Bethlehem.
Sorry if I don't trust any religious person's interpretations of "prophecies" fulfilled. Two gospels put Mary and Joseph in Bethlehem. Both were written long after Jesus was born. Then, like I asked you before, Matthew has Jesus going to Egypt and Luke has him going back to Nazareth. You trust it and believe it. I have my concerns.
From Isaiah 11:15-16More than happy to discuss Isaiah 11, the final verse 16 is my longing to fulfil in my lifetime, a pilgrimage from Baghdad to Akka and Mount Carmel.
And yet you fail to answer the question. What does 457BC have to do with the sacrifice being stopped and all the rest of the stuff. So why does the 2300 years start there? Then we have this...
Then Baha'is go on to count all the other references that can be transformed into 1260 years start and stop in the same years, even though the things being talked about, like the Umayyads and Abbasids, didn't begin or end in those years. Why? Yes, it is very plain and very simple. Those are the only dates that work for Baha'is, so they make everything start in 621AD, so everything can end in 1844. One thing for sure, Baha'is shouldn't use prophecies as any kind of proof. They should stick with Baha'u'llah's life and his writings... But then, who came up with these fulfilled "prophecies"? I know Bill Sears and I think Abdul Baha' too. Who else found all these Bible prophecies that supposedly were fulfilled by Baha'u'llah?
From Isaiah 11:15-16
(NIV)
'The Lord will dry up
the gulf of the Egyptian sea;
with a scorching wind he will sweep his hand
over the Euphrates River.
He will break it up into seven streams
so that anyone can cross over in sandals.
16 There will be a highway for the remnant of his people
that is left from Assyria,
as there was for Israel
when they came up from Egypt.'
But has the gulf of the Egyptian sea dried up?
Also it wasn't a scorching wind that caused the Euphrates to dry up, but rather man-made dams. And has anyone counted its streams to check that exactly seven are left?
Then there is the small matter of Assyria not existing anymore, and that most of the Jews that returned probably did so by air or by ship, not by highway over a dried up sea as they were alleged to have done in the time of the mythical Moses.
Then there is the fact that not all Jews have returned as some of them are happy living in foreign nations.
It'd be interesting to ask the Jews how they interpret it, in the context of the whole chapter.Okay, what is the better interpretation of the "he"? Is it "they" like some of the other translations? Then, what is the context of this one verse. How do Jews interpret it? Hmmm? Who could we ask? I know... why not a Jew?
Christians and Baha'is both take one verse and make it into a prophecy. With Christians a big one is Isaiah 7:14, yet they ignore the rest of the verses. With Baha'is this one from Micah 7:12 is used a lot. In context, how do Jews interpret this verse?
I don't know. If you read the chapter maybe you can figure it out.When Jesus said until I come, what event was he talking about? Until I come where?
I do believe that Jesus lived on after His death, but not in a physical body, in a spiritual body.Isaiah talked about the servant's continued life after his death. He talked about Jesus prolonging his days and seeing the light of life.