There is no proof here, only absurd assertions.
Do you actually even understand what a funicular is. Never mind that is rhetorical.
A Funicular is a counter balanced system that relays on conterbalanced weights to move the cars up and down so that the only motive energy required is to move the cargo. In your hypothetical case you seem to think that the blocks serve as not only cargo but also as ballast. This works if you just want to move a block up and then watch it come back down while the other one goes up.
Nobody understands you because your understanding/proof is just plain wrong. It may have taken humans thousands of years to write the understanding down in mathematical terms, but what goes up must come down and there is no free lunch has been understood since before words existed to describe these truisms.
Your claims to understand some imaginary internal language (which you claim to be lost to others) is not a greater understanding but a delusional misunderstanding of fundamental physics even before you attempt to discuss chemistry or evolution or anything else that happens.
I keep saying the same things until I'm blue in the face. People want me to solve this and then understand it for them. This is impossible.
Water goes down one end of a linear funicular configured across the top of the pyramid. The other end brings stones up about 12- 18 tons at a time. The men mostly stand around and watch but building 6 1/2 million ton pyramids 481' in a desert requires a lot of human effort even if the gods are already doing most of the work,
The funicular goes back and forth, up and down, or as the builders said "to and fro". Nephthys and isis are the "Harmonious Goddesses" who bring material to the workers and take seker to the Marsh of Offerings. I don't know how much simpler this can be since the builders didn't know everything like we do and every single man understood it perfectly to the degree ancient science understood each of the gods who were tasked with building it.
I don't understand what is so difficult. I know I flit from perspective to perspective a little but every word and sentence is meant literally. Every term should be apparent from context. Then if I say they spoke a metaphysical language I hear a chorus asking what a magical language is. [sigh]
I change perspectives because this is the way I think and I thought this way even before I understood two different metaphysics.
Again all the physical evidence is on my side. There are thousands of data points in the physical evidence itself. I can see these because I know how it was built. They said how it was built many many times. The evidence exists not because they said so but rather they said so because this is how it was built and this is the evidence they left.
926a. To say: The two reed-floats of heaven are placed by the morning-boat for Rē‘,
926b. that Rē‘ may ferry over on them to Horus who inhabits the horizon, to the horizon.
926c. The two reed-floats of heaven are placed by the evening-boat for Horus who inhabits the horizon,
926d. that Horus who inhabits the horizon may ferry over on them to Rē‘, to the horizon.
927a. The two reed-floats of heaven are caused to descend for N. by the morning-boat,
927b. that N. may mount on them to Rē‘, to the horizon.
927c. The two reed-floats of heaven are caused to descend for N. by the evening-boat,
927d. that N. may mount on them to Horus, who inhabits the horizon, to the horizon.
928a. N. mounts on high on this eastern side of heaven where the gods are born;
Many fine details of construction are visible as well as the finished product. From this I can see the evidence that is invisible to Egyptologists and everyone else. This is how I am able to make so many highly detailed predictions and the results are so surprising to Zahi Hawass he won't even let other Egyptologists in on it. I've been dealing with this for years and it gets increasingly surrealistic.