I can't emphasize too much that the great pyramid builders said again and again exactly how the pyramids were built. But just like a bee's waggle dance it is context specific in every instance. Sometimes it is said from the perspective of sekhmet which was the power used to lift the stones and sometimes from atum's perspective which was the water source that provided that power. This isn't the way we talk so it can be very hard to see.
This one is from the perspective of a human at ground level. "Ground level" was known as the "integrated apron" which was the container for hundreds of acre feet of water. Egyptologists call it the "pavement". It's scientific name was "ssm.t-apron" and its colloquial term was "temple of set". Everything had three words and the classification of the words chosen defined the part of the sentence in which it was used.
367b. that N. may sit in thy place and row (around) in heaven in thy boat, O Re.
368a. N. pushes off from the earth in thy boat, O Rē‘;
368b. so when thou goest forth from the horizon, he (N.) has his sceptre in his hand,
368c. as navigator of thy boat, O Rē‘,
369. Thou (N.) mountest up to heaven; thou separatest thyself from the earth, a separation from wife and office (royal-apron).
The "Boat of Re" is the colloquial term for the pyramid. The dead king is the pyramid which "sails" the circumpolar stars because the pyramid and star are the mnemonics to remember the king that he might never die. By day he is the pyramid and by night a star. When the king as the horuses (stones) leave the earth he is in the dndndr-boat depending from the dm-sceptre at 81' 3". He leaves the horizon when the counterweight is dropped on the other side of the pyramid and follows the dm-sceptre to heaven. It navigates his boat as he mounts to heaven and even as the pyramid mounts to heaven as well. He first leaves the "min" on the east side of the pyramid at the pavement in the horizon.
It's hard to believe how easy all this is. Egyptology missed it all. They drew pictures and blueprints and left copious clues in their words and in extensive physical evidence. Egyptology missed it. They missed it because they expected the builders to be just like Egyptologists and they actually have more in common with beavers and bees than with any Egyptologist. They missed it because they were too busy parsing gobbledty gook to even notice it all made perfect sense. They missed it because they believed in assumptions that were false in 1820 and no less false today. They missed it because they can only think like Egyptologists and they used improper methodology.
No two Egyptologists even pretend to know what the above words mean and they don't. They'll have fistfights over such minutia and not one of them will ever even consider the possibility that the intended meaning is the literal meaning. And that this literal meaning shows exactly how the pyramids were built. You just have to put it all together with the physical evidence and the drawings. You just have to think like an Egyptian instead of an Egyptologist.