• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

How Do You Measure Compassion?

sandy whitelinger

Veteran Member
I think what I see as good projects from Buddha-nature, but that what is unvirtue is due to illusion and ignorance. It is akin to Plato's notion that evil cannot have it's own reality, because it is by nature- a distortion or wrong application of good.
That would make both virtue and unvirtue indistinguishable at their Sorce, would it not? They only differ in their application?

I understood the rest of what you said.
 

Skwim

Veteran Member
We live and percieve a world of dimensions; length, width, height and time. All these things are measurable.

My question is, how do you measure compassion? Does it exist if it isn't measurable?
I'd say input the variables as Riccati–Bessel functions: Sn, Cn, ξn, ζn, or simply use a protractor. :shrug:

.


.
 

Buddha Dharma

Dharma Practitioner
Not exactly because in the Buddhist worldview, one of them is born of illusion. Depending what you mean though, you could be right. Semantics can be so fun.
 

sandy whitelinger

Veteran Member
Not exactly because in the Buddhist worldview, one of them is born of illusion. Depending what you mean though, you could be right. Semantics can be so fun.
Yes, language is tricky. It seems that Plato was saying that evil is just a distortion of good. This would mean that at their source they are both the same.
 
Last edited:

Skwim

Veteran Member
If your going to speak in tongues at least provide a translator.
Sorry.

Inline4.gif
=
Inline6.gif
Inline1.gif
=
Inline3.gif


where j_n(z) and n_n(z) are spherical Bessel functions of the first and second kind.
source


And "protractor."

56789_27cbbcfe_149061156183_600_401.jpg


.
 
Last edited:

sandy whitelinger

Veteran Member
Not exactly because in the Buddhist worldview, one of them is born of illusion. Depending what you mean though, you could be right. Semantics can be so fun.
Should both have the same source, it would seem that the Budda nature would also come from a higher dimension, perhaps different from the source of dualities, ie. virtue/unvirtue.
 

Skwim

Veteran Member
I've never

I've never heard of a translator needing a translator. This can only be blasphemy.
Of course it is. And thank god for the Bible where I learnt all about blaspheming, and what qualifies and what doesn't. Bessel functions being one of those that qualifies.
.
 

YmirGF

Bodhisattva in Recovery
I do have a cold. My mind is having a hard time. There might be a deeper meaning though. Does it come from God if it has no dimesionality? How does it exist without dimensionality?
I feel for you that you are not feeling well. Hope you get better soon.
I don't see it as coming from any god, but I do see it as a natural component of our type of consciousness. It's a personality trait.
 

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
I feel for you that you are not feeling well. Hope you get better soon.
I don't see it as coming from any god, but I do see it as a natural component of our type of consciousness. It's a personality trait.

Other social animals besides humans display empathy and compassion. Clearly they must be reading their bibles if they've managed to receive such traits delivered directly from the stratosphere.
 
Top