Buddha Dharma
Dharma Practitioner
Laou Tzu would probably say the one who doesn't concieve of it.
Precisely right. Master Lao Tzu is correct.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Laou Tzu would probably say the one who doesn't concieve of it.
That would make both virtue and unvirtue indistinguishable at their Sorce, would it not? They only differ in their application?I think what I see as good projects from Buddha-nature, but that what is unvirtue is due to illusion and ignorance. It is akin to Plato's notion that evil cannot have it's own reality, because it is by nature- a distortion or wrong application of good.
I'd say input the variables as Riccati–Bessel functions: Sn, Cn, ξn, ζn, or simply use a protractor.We live and percieve a world of dimensions; length, width, height and time. All these things are measurable.
My question is, how do you measure compassion? Does it exist if it isn't measurable?
That is correct.Laou Tzu would probably say the one who doesn't concieve of it.
If your going to speak in tongues at least provide a translator.I'd say input the variables as Riccati–Bessel functions: Sn, Cn, ξn, ζn, or simply use a protractor.
.
.
Yes, language is tricky. It seems that Plato was saying that evil is just a distortion of good. This would mean that at their source they are both the same.Not exactly because in the Buddhist worldview, one of them is born of illusion. Depending what you mean though, you could be right. Semantics can be so fun.
Mirror, mirror on the wall...
Who has the greatest compassion of all?
I was unaware that I was... lolShould have stopped while you were winning...lol.
The reason being that he would then treat all things the same. This is the greatest compassion...if we were to measure such things.Precisely right. Master Lao Tzu is correct.
Its always good tp make the first move.Should have stopped while you were winning...lol.
I've never heard of a translator needing a translator. This can only be blasphemy.Sorry.
=
=
where j_n(z) and n_n(z) are spherical Bessel functions of the first and second kind.
source
.
Thanks for driving by.compassion is inversely proportional to uselessness
Should both have the same source, it would seem that the Budda nature would also come from a higher dimension, perhaps different from the source of dualities, ie. virtue/unvirtue.Not exactly because in the Buddhist worldview, one of them is born of illusion. Depending what you mean though, you could be right. Semantics can be so fun.
Of course it is. And thank god for the Bible where I learnt all about blaspheming, and what qualifies and what doesn't. Bessel functions being one of those that qualifies.I've never
I've never heard of a translator needing a translator. This can only be blasphemy.
I feel for you that you are not feeling well. Hope you get better soon.I do have a cold. My mind is having a hard time. There might be a deeper meaning though. Does it come from God if it has no dimesionality? How does it exist without dimensionality?
I feel for you that you are not feeling well. Hope you get better soon.
I don't see it as coming from any god, but I do see it as a natural component of our type of consciousness. It's a personality trait.