• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

How Do You Regard RF?

Which is more accurate to how you regard RF?


  • Total voters
    32
  • Poll closed .

PoetPhilosopher

Veteran Member
Like what?

I have a few ideas, but to talk about something more concrete:

I think that the public Journals section should be expanded into a larger area, somehow. Maybe more sub-boards.

This is not to really be confused with @Quagmire 's idea he spoke about weeks go - which I see pros and cons to, and didn't vote on.
 

sun rise

The world is on fire
Premium Member
I spend quite a bit of posting time on two joke threads which reflects the community aspects for me.

Timezones (and lack of a new thread facility) impact the debate/discuss area. Often I find something interesting but then realize that the discussion ended before I woke up in the morning.
 

sun rise

The world is on fire
Premium Member
I spend quite a bit of posting time on two joke threads which reflects the community aspects for me.

Timezones (and lack of a new thread facility) impact the debate/discuss area. Often I find something interesting but then realize that the discussion ended before I woke up in the morning.
I posted a couple of very serious scientific studies of remote viewing, one by the CIA which reviewed quite a few studies and posted their statistical and methodological reviews. Then I posted another which was a follow up and discussed two options of what it takes to say something is established.

Maybe one person read anything but the vast majority just posted their beliefs not being at all responsive to the OP title nor the evidence. It's clear to me that almost without exception RF is not a place for truly serious discussion beyond the arena of beliefs. Oh well, I'll just stick to the humor threads more and more.

If science proves that non-local consciousness is real how does that change your understanding in case anyone wants to see why I have the feedback I just wrote for this thread.
 

Sgt. Pepper

All you need is love.
First option but I'd add, somewhere to enjoy yourself and have some fun

I agree with you, Christine.

I chose other.

I regard RF as a tool of Satan designed to get people to question their beliefs.

And we all know that questioning is evil.

EEeeeEEEEEEeeeeeviiiiiilllle!!!!!!

2ph0wz.gif
 
Top