The Transcended Omniverse
Well-Known Member
Some would say that it makes no sense to say that life is meaningless without an eternal blissful afterlife. That it would be no different than finite things which can be meaningful such as a game or a movie. Even though they don't last forever, they can be meaningful.
But if you got a game or a movie and it was something you hated, was something unsatisfactory to you, etc., then it would make sense for you to look at that said game or movie and call it an insignificant, worthless, meaningless piece of crap.
If it also offered no ultimate rewarding epilogue for you, then it would make sense to say that the game/movie was meaningless crap. But if there was the ultimate epilogue and it was the greatest and most enjoyable/satisfactory epilogue, then you can say that the game/movie itself was meaningless crap, but that the epilogue was awesome.
It would also be no different than if you were working at a certain job and this job was hardship and misery. If you get the ultimate pay at the end of the job, then all that toil and hardship was meaningful to you. But if there is no pay, then that job is something meaningless to you and you would just give up on it.
So that would also apply to life itself. If you are living a life of much misery and it is a life you hate, then it would make sense for you to call it meaningless all you like. It would be no different than that game or movie you hated. But if there is the ultimate epilogue (the eternal blissful afterlife in which you can have everything you want), then you can say that the afterlife is the ultimate meaningful life for you.
It would also be no different than that situation with the job. If there is the ultimate life for you at the end (the pay), then pushing on through this life (the job) of hardship and misery was well worth it. It was something meaningful. But if there is no such afterlife (pay), then the life (job) was something meaningless to you and you would just give up on it and take yourself out of it.
But if you got a game or a movie and it was something you hated, was something unsatisfactory to you, etc., then it would make sense for you to look at that said game or movie and call it an insignificant, worthless, meaningless piece of crap.
If it also offered no ultimate rewarding epilogue for you, then it would make sense to say that the game/movie was meaningless crap. But if there was the ultimate epilogue and it was the greatest and most enjoyable/satisfactory epilogue, then you can say that the game/movie itself was meaningless crap, but that the epilogue was awesome.
It would also be no different than if you were working at a certain job and this job was hardship and misery. If you get the ultimate pay at the end of the job, then all that toil and hardship was meaningful to you. But if there is no pay, then that job is something meaningless to you and you would just give up on it.
So that would also apply to life itself. If you are living a life of much misery and it is a life you hate, then it would make sense for you to call it meaningless all you like. It would be no different than that game or movie you hated. But if there is the ultimate epilogue (the eternal blissful afterlife in which you can have everything you want), then you can say that the afterlife is the ultimate meaningful life for you.
It would also be no different than that situation with the job. If there is the ultimate life for you at the end (the pay), then pushing on through this life (the job) of hardship and misery was well worth it. It was something meaningful. But if there is no such afterlife (pay), then the life (job) was something meaningless to you and you would just give up on it and take yourself out of it.