The reality is that this area is in fact the area where creationist have by far, the strongest evidence that is overwhelmingly in their favour.
Not in the opinion of the experts or the scientifically literate. Why do you suppose that experts in interpreting evidence come to a different conclusion than the creationists regarding what it implies?
Every example of information in the living cell tells us someone had to code it.
Tells YOU. The creationist sees the world through a faith-based confirmation bias, one that formed when he chose to believe that a god exists without sufficient evidentiary support, and so now, when others look at nature and see a what, he sees a who.
Each time our body copies...a little bit of information is corrupted and usually lost. A small amount of the broken code is passed on down to the next generation. Where did the human code come from? Obviously primitive life...therefore given our dna is different, and yet slowly loosing purity because mutations in us are degenerative and not an improvement, that goes against the claim it came from primitive life in the first place.
If you pass a harmful mutation that forms in one of your gametes to the next generation, and it creates a defective organism, that gene will be weeded out by natural selection. Contrarily, if the mutation confers a selective advantage, the opposite occurs, and that allele increases in frequency in the gene pool. It is in this way that the genome does the opposite to what you suggest.
The sod off and don't read or reply to them!
He wrote, "If you are not going to support your claims, there is no reason to even read your posts." What I believe he's telling you is that he doesn't care about the incorrect ideas others collect by faith. Like me, he's probably only interested in what others know and can demonstrate to be correct.
The theory of evolution will always be a theory.
Agreed. The chance of falsifying it seems quite remote.
Many theories that have stood though history are being questioned now due to scientific advancements.
That's the glory of the scientific method. That's how scientific knowledge evolves. It's analogous to biological evolution as Dawkins suggested using the term meme in place of gene. Most hypotheses are wrong. Think of Edison testing substances to be filaments in his light bulb. Most failed and those ideas were tossed. Once a success was achieved, THAT idea was kept, and later improved upon. In this way, the wrong ideas scientists test and disconfirm are culled while the good ideas accumulate.
you can not define how even one evolutionary trait was arrived at. When was the mutation, what was the mutation, what made the mutation beneficiary.
Correct.
Do you think that says something about the correctness of the science? I ask because your posting is unique in my experience on religious message boards. On the one hand, you call the theory correct, and then write things like the above, which is a standard tool in the creationist toolbox - the sea lioning and the implied ignorantium fallacy. He's trying to imply that if you can't answer his questions, that the science is wrong and by default, that his religious beliefs are correct. That doesn't seem to be what you're up to, or if it is, it's so stealth as to be counterproductive to that purpose. One cannot argue creationism by affirming the science that contradicts it.
The development you are speaking of is selective breeding not evolution by scientific definition of the theory.
Artificial selection piggybacks onto natural selection. Even with animal husbandry and horticulture, we are still allowing some natural mutations to enter and dominate a gene pool. What we've changed is the environment in which this process occurs in. My pug is a product of that process. His ancestors were the fittest and the most fecund because fitness in that setting was defined by what pleased the breeders. Nevertheless, the biological process proceeds as always, with genes that confer cuteness or whatever other trait pleases man infiltrating then later dominating gene pools.
Have a nice day...