FYI, my husband has recently been treated for cancer, had the first robotic operation of its type in france, followed up by an intensive daily course of radiotherapy. Now he will live to see our children grow rather than die a painful death in a few years. So please dont preach your aluminium hat fears to me.
I'm truly sorry that you both have had to go through that. I have sat with two very dear friends who both died from their cancers. One went the orthodox route and had many rounds of chemo and radiation, only to be told that it was actually killing her quicker than the cancer, so they virtually told her to go home and die. Her final weeks of life were a nightmare for her family and friends, and she died unrecognizable....not from the cancer but from the treatments.
The other one opted for more natural therapies and the rest of her life was not spent with her head in a toilet and no hair. The cancer caught up with her at the end, but there was only two weeks of palliative care at the end and she still looked like herself. I would choose the second option any day. Who said you have to wait to die in agony anyway? Isn't euthanasia a more humane option? Why is that not offered?
In fact, one can end their own life simply by refusing to eat or drink. No one can force you to live if you choose to stop suffering and have no hope of recovery. That is an option my husband chose and we supported him. His disease was progressive and incurable, so he decided when it was time to go.....who could tell him it was wrong? Its called "passive euthanasia" and there is no law of God or man that is broken.
Besides which fact, cannabis is proving to be an effective pain medication and cancer fighter as more and more people are turning to it when told there is nothing more that orthodox medicine can do for them. Many have survived when doctors told them they should be dead. Not just remissions, but long term cures. The cancer has not returned. Olivia Newton John is dedicated to giving others the same opportunity that she has had. We need California's laws to be employed world wide. Guess who is standing in the way of that?
The orthodox approach is to use only one or more of the only options on offer.....chemo, radiotherapy or surgery. Each one has the propensity to offer a short term fix. But I guess for some, that is all they expect when the recovery rate long term is only about 2%.
That's up to you, i can assure you, you are in the minority.
I am by no means in a minority. Many people are so fed up with the endless drug treatments that often make their lives a misery, (especially pain killers) often creating crippling dependencies, with no cures ever offered or sought in many cases. Natural therapies get to the cause of the problem instead of just throwing a blanket over the symptoms.
Yes, some few do, they would have died anyway but they took a chance of a cure. Most make a full or partial recovery extending their life by years
OK, so would you settle for an extension of life.....or a cure if there was one?
Cancer has been continuing to take lives even up to this minute in an age where it seems that they can do everything else but hit this thing on the head. Cancer treatments have not virtually changed in decades. Do they not know what causes it? Do they not know how apoptosis (destruction of cancer cells) works naturally in a healthy body? All we need to prevent cancer in the first place is a healthy immune system, and the world we live in is robbing all of us of a chance to have one. The food we eat, the air we breathe, and the water we drink, are all vital to life on this planet, but we are killing ourselves by polluting every one of them.
Placebo medicine is only so effective. And in most cases does no or little long term good.
Who told you that placebos provide no long term cures? You need to broaden your knowledge base if you think that orthodox medicine is in any way superior to natural medicine. Many MD's are opting out of the orthodox system because they are tired of being told what they can and cannot do for their patients.
Epilepsy in children for example....cannabis has been shown to be a superior medicine in the treatment of intractable epilepsy, yet many countries still outlaw its use despite evidence that it works. These children are forced to take ineffective pharma medications that have awful side effects, when cannabis has a high success rate with no side effects at all. Who is responsible for that do you think?
What licensed medicos are permitted to do isn't working and hasn't been for a long time. Many are defecting when they see the results of the alternative therapies.