Quite the opposite!
Life without a test is life having no worth.
But life itself as "just a test"? Nope, that's a devaluing sentiment. Life is far, far more important than that.
One lives and one dies....................that's it?
Yes. What's wrong with that?
There can be no hope in that, but in suffering? We find our worth.
Like I said, if accepting that life is finite leaves you without any kind of hope, then I feel sorry for you. You should not have to coddle yourself with delusions of immortality in order to find hope and purpose in existence.
And if we find our worth, we then must also discover our hope...for for what be the hope in suffering if all there was to life was just to live and die and after that nothing.
In case you didn't realize, there's a bit that happens to us before we die. It's called
life, and
things happen in it. Important thing. We find happiness, we lose it it, we learn, we teach, we succeed, we fail, we find meaning in our existence, we rejoice and we despair. These experiences and passing them on to the next generation is what gives us hope and purpose, and if you deny any of this by insisting that there is no hope in a finite life then you don't know the first thing about living. The fact that life is finite gives our lives import and purpose - an eternal life is a meaningless one. Do not dare diminish the short time we have on this earth by deluding yourself with notions of a hereafter. The sooner you accept mortality, the sooner you start to realize the richness and poignancy of life. People who yearn for immortality will never be able to understand that.
No.
From people. People are the ones who express and feel love, and we need no divine agency working through us in order to feel it.
Animals nurturing are inherently programed while in humanity, it can be denied.
Animals can and do deny it all the time - just like humans do. Humans are programmed to care for their young in the exact same way as animals are, we're just able to express it in a greater many ways.
"and we don't even do it for survival a lot of the time" only goes to prove that if love is not an outside antidote, life goes on as like in the animal kingdom.
So, on the one hand you're saying that God works through mankind because we aren't like animals because animals "devour one another", and now you claim that God works through men because men
can kill eachother but sometimes choose not to? Also, what about instances of animals having the capacity to hurt eachother but choosing not to? Do they count? For example, you ever seen piranhas in a feeding frenzy? They all go for the food at the same time and rapidly gnaw away at it, completely tearing apart their prey in a matter of seconds. Yet, in all the chaos of the frenzy, no piranha will bite another - neither by accident nor out of competition for food. Is this an example of God working through piranhas?