A
angellous_evangellous
Guest
I'd say about as historical as Die Hard 4.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I know they found the city of Troy, which for a long time, many believed to be just a myth. That raises the question, how much of the Illiad is historical? Did any of the characters from the Illiad actually exist? Achilles, Patroclus, Agammemon, Menalus, Hector, etc.
oberon said:Scholars used to doubt all of it. Then they found troy. So they doubted all the rest of it. Then they found evidence in hittite texts which mention Priam and Paris. It seems that even after a long oral and mythic tradition, remnants of historical material may be maintained.
That's because linear B is greek. In fact, there are syntactical/grammatical archaicisms in Homer which aren't present in Linear B (even though Linear B is actually dated prior to homer). However, Hittite (while Indo-European) is quite a different language (one of the central languages used in the reconstruction of pre-indo-european due to several factors, including the bi-gender nominal inflection).There some names mention in Linear B, both in Pylos and Knossos (Crete), but most of these names are probably of divine nature than humans. Names that are later found in archaic and classical Greek literature.
Here, have some frubals.
Are the people on the Achean side also fictionalized circle one? Meaning they didn't literally exist? Agammemnon, Achilles, etc.?
Noooooooooooo!!! I can't lose him!!!
Circle_One:
Do you know around what century that they were written? I've found sources stating when it was, but they blur the line between verbal and written composition and I can't get a consistent answer.
Thank youHonestly, I have that answer, I just don't remember it at this exact moment. Let me check my notes in the morning and I'll get back to you.
The date as well as manner of composition are still debated topics. Usually, both epics are dated to c. 8th century. However, earlier (and some later) dates have been proposed. Additionally, while most scholars are willing to acknowledge that there isn't really anyway to know whether both epics were composed by the same author, there are arguments for and against. More interesting are the arguments concerning orality and multiple authors. The arguments against oral composition of the poems took a big hit after Parry and Lord, but the question as to whether both were composed by a single author or multiple authors is ongoing.Honestly, I have that answer, I just don't remember it at this exact moment. Let me check my notes in the morning and I'll get back to you.
Scholars used to doubt all of it. Then they found troy. So they doubted all the rest of it. Then they found evidence in hittite texts which mention Priam and Paris. It seems that even after a long oral and mythic tradition, remnants of historical material may be maintained.
I know they found the city of Troy, which for a long time, many believed to be just a myth. That raises the question, how much of the Illiad is historical? Did any of the characters from the Illiad actually exist? Achilles, Patroclus, Agammemon, Menalus, Hector, etc.
Oberon,
Are you referring to this letter?
Information about the Hittites - Text Translations
Piyama-radu = Paris?
And this one for Priam - Information about the Hittites - Text Translations
A_E said:Oberon,
Are you referring to this letter?
Information about the Hittites - Text Translations
Piyama-radu = Paris?
I noticed that when I was reading Dante's Inferno. Dante seemed to believe the same thing, and had the characters instrumental in the downfall of Troy in the lower circles of Hell, and Virgil never had anything nice to say about them.Interestingly enough the Roman poet Virgil also was of the belief that the Romans were descendents of Troy.