• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

How should the Christian Church treat homosexuals?

Status
Not open for further replies.

yourgraceisenough

Active Member
For the fact that Christians do accept homosexuals for who they are rather than rely on an outdated cultural concept grounded in an abysmal ignorance. Christians who actually understand the meaning that Jesus, or Yeshuah, preached rather than that of an impostor religion that did nothing more than impose an outdated view of sexuality by an impostor called Paul.

Of course, many people of simple mind who can do more than parrot forth lies spilt forth from a podium by the modern evangelist who feel that their own genitalia is threatened by the facts of nature's own development continue to spill forth this ill begotten seed known as the Pualine Acts against sexuality of the insecure male continue the nefarious thought such an ill begotten seed known as tradition.

Which side do you pour from?

Do you perpetuate this noxious nocturnal from a disgruntled Jew who claimed forgiveness for his own means or do you understand that which nature's eye has given us to discern the deluded from the actual?

heard it all before...

it is God's standards and always has been just because those standards have fell so badly in modern society does not matter at all....:)
 

gnomon

Well-Known Member
heard it all before...

it is God's standards and always has been just because those standards have fell so badly in modern society does not matter at all....:)

Don't tell me.

That you follow a megolamaniac's version of King David's consolidation of a loose group of ancient Hebrews who turned a loving rabbi's vision of an all loving God into nothing more than a precept to continue an outdated tradition speaks volumes.

Mayhaps you are lost among the intellectual flood given that a human child is born with a vagina but no uterus and possesses the genetic makeup of a male but is recognized as purely female only tells me that you rely upon the dogma of a false hope among a defunct tradition which other cultures had already recognized as the same divinely ordained construct as that of the so called male/female dichotomy.

There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio,
Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.

Great play. Highly recommended.
 

9Westy9

Sceptic, Libertarian, Egalitarian
Premium Member
the term homosexuality kind of gives away its meaning, I go with the idea its an attraction to people of the same sex...

does this have any point to it...?:)

Because the bible only says stuff on homosexual intercourse. Unless you have a different bible :rolleyes:
 

yourgraceisenough

Active Member
Don't tell me.

That you follow a megolamaniac's version of King David's consolidation of a loose group of ancient Hebrews who turned a loving rabbi's vision of an all loving God into nothing more than a precept to continue an outdated tradition speaks volumes.

Mayhaps you are lost among the intellectual flood given that a human child is born with a vagina but no uterus and possesses the genetic makeup of a male but is recognized as purely female only tells me that you rely upon the dogma of a false hope among a defunct tradition which other cultures had already recognized as the same divinely ordained construct as that of the so called male/female dichotomy.



Great play. Highly recommended.

lol... no i'm just one of those believers who think God has set a standard for us to follow and that should not be changed to accomodate the latest fads...:)
 

vnct

Member
generalisation always happens when they discuss "the church or organised religion" they like to think all believers are the same yet all gays are individuals...
meanwhile, you're doing the same thing, exact with the opposite people. you're generalizing gays as 'they' while individuating christians such as yourself. with you, it's all about 'us' and 'them' as opposed to 'we'. the categorizations fall short.

for example, i don't classify my father and his marriage partner as 'the gays'. they are just individual human beings. people are just people.
 

gnomon

Well-Known Member
lol... no i'm just one of those believers who think God has set a standard for us to follow and that should not be changed to accomodate the latest fads...:)

A fad is understood as something that is new.

Homosexuals and intersex are not new. Even the Jews recognized intersex individuals prior to the birth of the God you claim to follow.

Please make another attempt that is not grounded in utter stupidity.
 

vnct

Member
for what reason would two gays want to go to a known Christian bed and breakfast???
i just want to invite them to church. i want to invite my relatives to church, but you have a psychological hindrance if i invite my family to a church service. i had never raised any objection when you wanted to invite your drug-addicted cousin (hypothetical) to a church service. yet you raise an objection when i wish to invite my homosexual father to a church service.
 
Last edited:

yourgraceisenough

Active Member
A fad is understood as something that is new.

Homosexuals and intersex are not new. Even the Jews recognized intersex individuals prior to the birth of the God you claim to follow.

Please make another attempt that is not grounded in utter stupidity.

just because you do not accept the answer it does not make it incorrect...:)
 

yourgraceisenough

Active Member
because they are my relatives and i invited them. i want to invite my relatives to church, but you have a psychological hindrance if i invite my family to a church service. i had never raised any objection when you wanted to invite your drug-addicted cousin (hypothetical) to a church service. yet you raise an objection when i wish to invite my homosexual father to a church service.

confused now I was talking to someone else on a completely unrelated subject, well not completely unrelated but different none the less..
 

Fester

Active Member
Because the bible only says stuff on homosexual intercourse. Unless you have a different bible :rolleyes:
The original scriptures do not mention the word "homosexual" at all. If I'm not mistaken, there was no such word in the Aramaic and ancient Hebrew languages. The word was added to only the most recent translations.
 

vnct

Member
confused now I was talking to someone else on a completely unrelated subject, well not completely unrelated but different none the less..
you have a problem if i just want to invite my gay father to church. i don't protest when you want to invite your drug-addicted cousin (hypothetical) to church.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top