How the Bible was proven fallible, by some goats

[Smoke]

What i did find interesting in the link was this statement:

"My own view, after careful consideration of the context is this: Jacob indeed involves himself in the practice of local superstitions. The reason for his prosperity, however, was a result of the blessing of God, and not related to any of his breeding techniques or superstitious activities. "​

That is interesting, especially since it directly contradicts the scripture. Genesis says nothing about God blessing Jacob in this context, but does say that it was was Jacob's supersititious practices that resulted in his prosperity:

And it came to pass, whensoever the stronger cattle did conceive, that Jacob laid the rods before the eyes of the cattle in the gutters, that they might conceive among the rods. But when the cattle were feeble, he put them not in: so the feebler were Laban's, and the stronger Jacob's.


​

It's beyond me why people who have already thrown science out the window should balk at accepting what the scripture says about this subject.

 

[Peacemaker]

Peacemaker,

Did you intend tis sentence

to be logically related to this sentence


Just curious

I'll admitt, I am not as educated in this area, an from the looks of it, it shows. It was a theory. A thought, nothing more. But I too am curious, what why and how is it refuted.

 

[CAPPA]

Coming from the pagan point of view, I should note that goats are notorious trouble-makers and will do anything if it will baffle or puzzle people afterward. This is not limited to eating whatever they can get their teeth on, and, I suspect, carries into control of their very genetics. (Okay, sorry. I know that was not helpful, but I love goats too much to be able to resist posting in this thread!)

[font=&quot]absolutely, positively hilarious!!

:bow:
[/font]

 

[angellous_evangellous]

I'll admitt, I am not as educated in this area, an from the looks of it, it shows. It was a theory. A thought, nothing more. But I too am curious, what why and how is it refuted.

When two statements are totally unrelated, it does not warrant refute.

 

[Opethian]

I just read this entire thread in one go and it is obvious Sandy really does have some deficiencies in the logic area.

 

[angellous_evangellous]

I just read this entire thread in one go and it is obvious Sandy really does have some deficiencies in the logic area.

You deserve some kind of reward for reading this whole thread.

 

[Opethian]

Thank you, it's just part of my daily practise to become the "forum iron man" :sarcastic

 

[Halcyon]

Holy moly, this is still going?!

High five for my longest running thread :highfive: , any takers?

No, oh well...

 

[alexander garcia]

science HAHAHAHAHA that is really funny to me because I live in Kentucky at the moment and we have the Durby here and I have a horse question for science. Would you bet on a horse that never ever won a race over a horse that never lost one? That is how science is . It has never been right not once! Pretty big statment? Well lets look at what part of the so called science you are speeking of? Is it the world is flat scientists you are speaking of ?HAHAHA. No that is to far back. HAHAHA. lets go to the ice age or now the ice ages? Because we are up to many of them now that some of our so called scintistshave seen how stupid the one ice age was that now they try to cover there stupidity by adding more and more ice ages to try and answer their unanswerable questions. Or shall we go way back to the little bang HAHAHA.Try and explain how a big bang could happen and planets stay in their orbit but at the same time they are expanding?HAHAHA Have you realizied this is stupid! science you say? Maybe you should try and define science into something real that can be proven! Here I'll give you a defanition of science what can be proved to have the same result every time you test it. Science is not every stupidity that comes out of a man untill it is proven a lie. And if anyone is out there that is a professor or teacher that believes these lies and cares to try and back their point in open debate, I am a 7th grade drop out that will be more than happy to show anyone that Yahvah can take the simple to confound the wise. Excuse my speling.

 

[Buttons*]

Holy moly, this is still going?!

High five for my longest running thread :highfive: , any takers?

No, oh well...

I'LL HIGH FIVE YOU! :highfive: GO GOATS!!!!

 

[Buttons*]

science HAHAHAHAHA that is really funny to me because I live in Kentucky at the moment and we have the Durby here and I have a horse question for science. Would you bet on a horse that never ever won a race over a horse that never lost one? That is how science is . It has never been right not once! Pretty big statment? Well lets look at what part of the so called science you are speeking of? Is it the world is flat scientists you are speaking of ?HAHAHA. No that is to far back. HAHAHA. lets go to the ice age or now the ice ages? Because we are up to many of them now that some of our so called scintistshave seen how stupid the one ice age was that now they try to cover there stupidity by adding more and more ice ages to try and answer their unanswerable questions. Or shall we go way back to the little bang HAHAHA.Try and explain how a big bang could happen and planets stay in their orbit but at the same time they are expanding?HAHAHA Have you realizied this is stupid! science you say? Maybe you should try and define science into something real that can be proven! Here I'll give you a defanition of science what can be proved to have the same result every time you test it. Science is not every stupidity that comes out of a man untill it is proven a lie. And if anyone is out there that is a professor or teacher that believes these lies and cares to try and back their point in open debate, I am a 7th grade drop out that will be more than happy to show anyone that Yahvah can take the simple to confound the wise. Excuse my speling.

why do you attempt to insult science when you cant even spell?

 

[angellous_evangellous]

Holy moly, this is still going?!

High five for my longest running thread :highfive: , any takers?

No, oh well...

I think that this calls for a mercy killing. It's just inhumane to watch a thread suffer for so long...

 

[sandy whitelinger]

I just read this entire thread in one go and it is obvious Sandy really does have some deficiencies in the logic area.

Tee hee:dan: Oh goody, a new dance partner. Pray tell oh insightful one, which area of logic am I deficient in? Would it be formal logic? Or maybe informal logic? Oh possibly it is some fault of my deduction and reasoning that you have trouble with? Or do you really know? Is it just some vague uneasiness you have with what I say? Maybe it's just a complete lack of understanding on your part. My guess would be.... oh , never mind.

 

[Halcyon]

science HAHAHAHAHA that is really funny to me because I live in Kentucky at the moment and we have the Durby here and I have a horse question for science. Would you bet on a horse that never ever won a race over a horse that never lost one? That is how science is . It has never been right not once! Pretty big statment? Well lets look at what part of the so called science you are speeking of? Is it the world is flat scientists you are speaking of ?HAHAHA. No that is to far back. HAHAHA. lets go to the ice age or now the ice ages? Because we are up to many of them now that some of our so called scintistshave seen how stupid the one ice age was that now they try to cover there stupidity by adding more and more ice ages to try and answer their unanswerable questions. Or shall we go way back to the little bang HAHAHA.Try and explain how a big bang could happen and planets stay in their orbit but at the same time they are expanding?HAHAHA Have you realizied this is stupid! science you say? Maybe you should try and define science into something real that can be proven! Here I'll give you a defanition of science what can be proved to have the same result every time you test it. Science is not every stupidity that comes out of a man untill it is proven a lie. And if anyone is out there that is a professor or teacher that believes these lies and cares to try and back their point in open debate, I am a 7th grade drop out that will be more than happy to show anyone that Yahvah can take the simple to confound the wise. Excuse my speling.

Science has never been right once? So the computer you're using to read this doesn't actually exist, because the science used to design it was wrong?

And the cars you see driving around, they're not really there because the science of the internal combustion engine is flawed?

And the planes you see flying overhead, those big lumps of metal weighing many tonnes, they can't actually fly right? Because the science used to create the aerodynamics and calculate the length and width of the wings, and the math used to determine the velocity needed to take off and maintain the craft airborne - all that is wrong because science is never right?

Quick Alexander run! Go see a shrink, because if you must be hallucinating all those things!

 

[Opethian]

Tee hee:dan: Oh goody, a new dance partner. Pray tell oh insightful one, which area of logic am I deficient in? Would it be formal logic? Or maybe informal logic? Oh possibly it is some fault of my deduction and reasoning that you have trouble with? Or do you really know? Is it just some vague uneasiness you have with what I say? Maybe it's just a complete lack of understanding on your part. My guess would be.... oh , never mind.

You seem to have a lack of the ability to link simple things that are related.

 

[Opethian]

science HAHAHAHAHA that is really funny to me because I live in Kentucky at the moment and we have the Durby here and I have a horse question for science. Would you bet on a horse that never ever won a race over a horse that never lost one? That is how science is . It has never been right not once! Pretty big statment? Well lets look at what part of the so called science you are speeking of? Is it the world is flat scientists you are speaking of ?HAHAHA. No that is to far back. HAHAHA. lets go to the ice age or now the ice ages? Because we are up to many of them now that some of our so called scintistshave seen how stupid the one ice age was that now they try to cover there stupidity by adding more and more ice ages to try and answer their unanswerable questions. Or shall we go way back to the little bang HAHAHA.Try and explain how a big bang could happen and planets stay in their orbit but at the same time they are expanding?HAHAHA Have you realizied this is stupid! science you say? Maybe you should try and define science into something real that can be proven! Here I'll give you a defanition of science what can be proved to have the same result every time you test it. Science is not every stupidity that comes out of a man untill it is proven a lie. And if anyone is out there that is a professor or teacher that believes these lies and cares to try and back their point in open debate, I am a 7th grade drop out that will be more than happy to show anyone that Yahvah can take the simple to confound the wise. Excuse my speling.

Are you deliberately trying to make a fool out of yourself?
Maybe you should stay away from your keyboard until you find a subject to write about of which you actually know something.

 

[angellous_evangellous]

:clap

You seem to have a lack of the ability to link simple things that are related.

:clap

 

[sandy whitelinger]

You seem to have a lack of the ability to link simple things that are related.

like your comment and anything sensible.

 

[Opethian]

like your comment and anything sensible.

Wow what a reply. You really are among the brightest of the human species!

 

[sandy whitelinger]

Wow what a reply. You really are among the brightest of the human species!

Ok i'll refrain from calling you something like an opinionated snob because that's frowned upon here. What is clear is that you know nothing of logic since, while you claimed that I'm lacking in simple logic you have failed to point out which rule of logic I've failed to grasp. Instead you made up something. A common tactic used by people who have an inferior knowledge of something. I'd probably explain the whole concept in this thread, seeing as it's rather simple, but I'm having way too much fun tweeking insentive self serving (can I say cretan) individuals such as yourself.