• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

How to become a Christian?

Terrywoodenpic

Oldest Heretic
How to become a Christian.
Many people ask, on these forums, what they need to do to become an Anglican, Catholic Orthodox or become member of some other church.
The usual things that come up are the various forms of baptism, the belief or not in the Trinity, the need for confirmation, the need to accept various beliefs surrounding the Eucharist.
The impossibility or otherwise of women priests and bishops. Sexuality and all its ramifications in the life of the churches. The perpetual virginity of Mary, Divorce and remarriage.

These things become a threshold or hurdle that you must jump, to be accepted into that particular church, or to enter the ranks of its priest hood.
Many churches have built up a mass of dogma that members are required to accept with out question.

Those early Christians that lived during the later years of Jesus mission and the few generations that followed knew none of these things. By the standard requirements of today's churches they would not be seen as Christian at all.

We know exactly how the new Judo-Christian sects taught many new gentile converts from about AD50 onward.
At that time most of the apostles were still alive and working. As was Paul, though it seems the books of the new testament were were not yet written or available as scripture. However there were numerous prophets, both false and true, as well as even more people, still living, who had heard Jesus speak and who were working amongst that population.

An oral form of Christian apprenticeship was quickly established and used to train the new comers in to the way of life. It required new members to be baptised in the name of the Father, in the name of the Son, and in the name of the holy spirit. But it was not Trinitarian as the concept of the three in one Trinity was yet a couple of hundred years in the future. It also required members to attend the weekly Eucharist.
This Eucharist was reserved to those members of the community who had been baptised in flowing water (or what ever water was available).

This Eucharist was first offered as a cup of wine …

we give you thanks, our Father,
for the holy vine of your servant David
which you revealed to us through your servant Jesus
To you (is) the glory for ever.

And concerning the broken (loaf)

We give you thanks our Father
for the life and knowledge
which you revealed to us through your servant Jesus
To you is the glory forever.

Just as this broken (loaf) was scattered
over the hills (as grain)
and, having been gathered together, become one;
in like fashion, may your church be gathered together
from the ends of the earth into your kingdom
Because yours is the glory and the power
through Jesus Christ forever. ( from the original Greek of the Didache)


This reveals that the concept of the body and blood of Christ and the redemption of sin was not yet associated with the Eucharist.

Even their Bishops were to be elected from within their own community, which does not gell with the later concept of the apostolic succession.

All this, if nothing else, shows how many of the concepts that we now hold fundamental to Christianity had not yet been formulated and certainly not essential to Christian belief.
These can include the Trinity, virgin Birth, Marianism, the Bible as the word of God, salvation through the death and resurrection of Christ, and large parts of the dogma of the various churches encapsulated in the creeds.

This may trouble some Christians. But the beauty and simplicity of the faith of these first Christian societies shines through with their love of God.
 

Pegg

Jehovah our God is One
Well explained Heretic.

Its refreshing to look at Christianity in the way Jesus disciples practised it. It was a very simple faith. God has sent a savior into the world, a living example for us to imitate so as to know what God requires of us and how we can do it.

Unfortunately people complicated it when they began introducing various traditions and strange teachings.
 
I agree, the church became corrupted early on.
In 2 Thessalonians chapter 2, the apostle Paul warned the first Christians that a great apostasy would set in. As I see it, the teachings of the churches added practices that were contrary to what Jesus taught.
 

Terrywoodenpic

Oldest Heretic
I agree, the church became corrupted early on.
In 2 Thessalonians chapter 2, the apostle Paul warned the first Christians that a great apostasy would set in. As I see it, the teachings of the churches added practices that were contrary to what Jesus taught.

It is not so much that the church became corrupted. But tha th church never had a framework in the first place.
those first Christian communities had to establish thir own rules as a means of self preservation, and as a framework for the inducton of new adherents.
Unfortunately that process of rule making and theological complication continued, and was heavily influenced by the Greek love of reasoned debate. Which took precidence over the received wisdom and teachings of Jesus.
this process continues to this day,by all denominations, and no less by JWs. Who in their worthy attempt to look backward to the early Judo Christian societies, have established a branch of Christianity with its own set of rules an dogma, that never existed, and is based like the other dogmas on selective beliefs and biblical passages. That have been engendered by the same sort of Greek logical reasoning, that distorted those early churches.
This seems to be a fundimental problem faced by all church structures.
 

Terrywoodenpic

Oldest Heretic
I agree, the church became corrupted early on.
In 2 Thessalonians chapter 2, the apostle Paul warned the first Christians that a great apostasy would set in. As I see it, the teachings of the churches added practices that were contrary to what Jesus taught.

Paul of course did perhaps more than anyone else to establish churches during his missionary travels. These were the first to break away fom the Judo Christian tradition and incorporate Greek religious concepts.

While Christianity owes a massive debt to the work of Paul and his fellow workers, they were also responsible for its future direction.

Had God wanted things to take a different course I am sure that he would have done so. In saying that I do not mean that the situation is perfect, but that the eventual path that Christianity will take is far from clear to us today. God's will will some day be done.
 

Terrywoodenpic

Oldest Heretic

This demonstrates perfectly the process of changing from one churches dogma to another's. Rather than accepting that we are all equal in the sight of God.
And that the dogma is the least important bit.

Even after such a process we are still only going to believe what we have come to believe, with out regard to what we "should" believe to fully conform.
The catholic Church has perhaps the most fully developed set of beliefs and practices that have been built on to and extended by argument into their present form. They are perhaps the furthest from the simplicity of those first Christian believers. They have even switched their main worship from God to intercession through the "Theotokos."
(The Council of Ephesus decreed this in 431.)
Such a practice was not recognised by the early church nor by any of the apostles, nor has it Biblical recognition.

This is from your link........ It should be noted that most churches have a similar process. ( the reception into the Anglican church Which may include an adult baptism, is usually included and completed at the time of a Confirmation )
What is meant when people refer to men and women coming into "full communion with the Church?

Coming into full communion with the Catholic Church describes the process for entrance into the Catholic Church for men and women who are baptized Christians but not Roman Catholics. These individuals make a profession of faith but are not baptized again. To prepare for this reception, the people, who are called "candidates," usually participate in a formation program to help them understand and experience the teachings and practices of the Catholic Church. Some preparation may be with catechumens preparing for baptism, but the preparation for candidates is different since they have already been baptized and committed to Jesus Christ, and many have also been active members of other Christian communities.
 

Desert Snake

Veteran Member
One becomes Christian when they accept Jesus as God, it's that simple. No priest or baptism is going to help you in that process.
 
Last edited:

Saint Frankenstein

Here for the ride
Premium Member
This demonstrates perfectly the process of changing from one churches dogma to another's. Rather than accepting that we are all equal in the sight of God.
And that the dogma is the least important bit.

Even after such a process we are still only going to believe what we have come to believe, with out regard to what we "should" believe to fully conform.
The catholic Church has perhaps the most fully developed set of beliefs and practices that have been built on to and extended by argument into their present form. They are perhaps the furthest from the simplicity of those first Christian believers. They have even switched their main worship from God to intercession through the "Theotokos."
(The Council of Ephesus decreed this in 431.)
Such a practice was not recognised by the early church nor by any of the apostles, nor has it Biblical recognition.

This is from your link........ It should be noted that most churches have a similar process. ( the reception into the Anglican church Which may include an adult baptism, is usually included and completed at the time of a Confirmation )

I was just answering your question. I'm really not interested in your ranting. If you think the churches have screwed things up, go ahead and start your own schismatic sect like so many others have and contribute to the disintegration of Christian unity. As for me, I prefer to side with the traditions that have the weight of thousands of years backing them up.
 
Last edited:

JM2C

CHRISTIAN
They have even switched their main worship from God to intercession through the "Theotokos."
(The Council of Ephesus decreed this in 431.)
Such a practice was not recognised by the early church nor by any of the apostles, nor has it Biblical recognition.
He was just telling the truth.
 

Terrywoodenpic

Oldest Heretic
I was just answering your question. I'm really not interested in your ranting. If you think the churches have screwed things up, go ahead and start your own schismatic sect like everyone else has and contribute to the disintegration of Christian unity. As for me, I prefer to side with the traditions that have the weight of thousands of years backing them up.

That is a very odd response.
if you have no interest why are you in this thread. It is an opportunity to discuss your beliefs. I am not sure God would have set thigs up the way he has if diversity of belief was not part of his plan.
I see no reason to start my own denomination, when my faith is well represented anyway. organisations like Churches Together are doing a good job on the ecumenical front .
 

JM2C

CHRISTIAN
If you think the churches have screwed things up, go ahead and start your own schismatic sect like everyone else has and contribute to the disintegration of Christian unity. As for me, I prefer to side with the traditions that have the weight of thousands of years backing them up.
“Christian unity?” but preferred the other “side” or maybe you just want to be a Christian first and set aside the “traditions that have the weight of thousands of years backing them up”

Just commenting.
 

Saint Frankenstein

Here for the ride
Premium Member
That is a very odd response.
if you have no interest why are you in this thread. It is an opportunity to discuss your beliefs. I am not sure God would have set thigs up the way he has if diversity of belief was not part of his plan.
I see no reason to start my own denomination, when my faith is well represented anyway. organisations like Churches Together are doing a good job on the ecumenical front .

I just answered the question of the thread title according to my beliefs. Do you have any idea how many of these "they changed the original teachings!" posts we get? It's a daily thing. It's exhausting, not to mention offensive. Apparently everyone - other Christians, members of other religions, atheists, etc. - agree that it's cool to bash the Catholic Church and, due to their closeness to us in belief and practice, Orthodox Christianity. Sometimes I wonder why a Catholic would even bother to post on a board like this.

According to my beliefs, His plan is to unite humanity under His Son in His Son's Church. The other religions have false teachings that stray from the Truth.
 

Saint Frankenstein

Here for the ride
Premium Member
“Christian unity?” but preferred the other “side” or maybe you just want to be a Christian first and set aside the “traditions that have the weight of thousands of years backing them up”

Just commenting.

I am a Christian "first". Go take your ignorance elsewhere.
 
Top