• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

How to deal with Leftist Anarchists

tytlyf

Not Religious
This is nothing new, anarchists will protest anything. If given the chance. These aren't riots, there isn't violence, this is typical for college campuses and the like. It's young people thinking they know it all.

I'm sure they'll be happy to repay the damages.

an·ar·chist
  1. a person who believes in or tries to bring about anarchy.
an·ar·chy
  1. a state of disorder due to absence or nonrecognition of authority.
Milo is an entertainer. He's not even gay. He's grifting very obviously. But some people think that's real news.
 

YmirGF

Bodhisattva in Recovery
I like you YmirGF, but you should know I didn't create this thread to make friends, or the "best" way to start any kind of conversation on this subject, but rather the most logical and truthful way.
I do understand, @Adramelek and the actions of the inane can be challenging to deal with. What seems to be lost on the protesters is that Milo's lecture/side show was about how freedom of speech on campuses over the US has become a thing of the past. The protesters unwittingly underscored his assertions.

The way I see it is, people have the right to protest whatever speaker they feel a need to. People do not have the right to shut down that speaker so that those who want to listen are deprived of the opportunity. Doing so infringes on freedom of speech. It is literally bullying people into submission.
 

YmirGF

Bodhisattva in Recovery
Milo is an entertainer. He's not even gay. He's grifting very obviously. But some people think that's real news.
I agree that he is an entertainer, an articulate, rather clever young man. I am rather confident saying he is gay. What is your evidence that he is not gay? Likewise, calling him a grifter is a bit of a stretch. If we include him then who is not?
 

psychoslice

Veteran Member
Its not whining, but my own truth on this, my own rf political "blog"!
No, you are right it is disgusting, I never thought I would see people acting like that in the US, why can't they except that they lost and let the man get on with the job, I'm sure these half wits would want their Hillary dillary to be left to do her job without the opposite rioting.:rolleyes:
 

tytlyf

Not Religious
I agree that he is an entertainer, an articulate, rather clever young man. I am rather confident saying he is gay. What is your evidence that he is not gay? Likewise, calling him a grifter is a bit of a stretch. If we include him then who is not?
He's already admitted it's an act. Sheesh. Tell me, what is his full time job?

Grifter
1.
a person who operates a side show at a circus, fair, etc., especially a gambling attraction.
2.
a swindler, dishonest gambler, or the like.
 

YmirGF

Bodhisattva in Recovery
He's already admitted it's an act. Sheesh. Tell me, what is his full time job?
Can you source that out for me. I find it rather difficult to believe. All I have found were dodgy blogs talking about it.

Senior editor at Breitbart Nudes?
 

tytlyf

Not Religious
Can you source that out for me. I find it rather difficult to believe.
An entertainer that plays a gay guy is hard to believe? I liked him on Faux last night....had a nice diamond in his left ear. Doubt he's ever worn it. It's all about the image and foolery. Dangerous people. Even someone as dumb as $ister $arah Palin can make a million doing. It's not really their fault, but the people who give them money. They're con artists. Rush is one of the best.
 

YmirGF

Bodhisattva in Recovery
An entertainer that plays a gay guy is hard to believe? I liked him on Faux last night....had a nice diamond in his left ear. Doubt he's ever worn it. It's all about the image and foolery. Dangerous people. Even someone as dumb as $ister $arah Palin can make a million doing. It's not really their fault, but the people who give them money.
So.... you have no sterling source. Gotcha...
 

Mindmaster

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
This is nothing new, anarchists will protest anything. If given the chance. These aren't riots, there isn't violence, this is typical for college campuses and the like. It's young people thinking they know it all.

I'm sure they'll be happy to repay the damages.


Milo is an entertainer. He's not even gay. He's grifting very obviously. But some people think that's real news.


I wouldn't deny that he's basically an entertainer, but that he's not gay is pretty silly. He used to have several photos of him in bed (though covered) with some of his various partners on twitter, at least when he had one. Esh, the guy radiates gay like the sun creates bright light, lol. Would you like to debate whether the sky is blue, or that water is wet? :D

I find this amazingly humorous.. If someone is gay and conservative then logically they must not be REALLY gay. It's simply IMPOSSIBLE. :tearsofjoy::tearsofjoy::tearsofjoy::tearsofjoy::tearsofjoy::tearsofjoy::tearsofjoy::tearsofjoy:
 
Last edited:

Mindmaster

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
And for you idiots who support these socialist anarchists, don't even think I am going to debate you on this, your not worthy!!

I am sickened and appalled by all of it!

Your sentiments really echo mine, but other than these isolated events I have no reason to be involved. However, I promise that if any little punk thinks they're going to burn things in my neck of the woods or hurt anyone in my presence they're gonna truly regret that mistake.

These guys really don't realize that this tactic only works until people are sick of your ****, then the old timers come out, kick some ***, and run you out of own. If I had to take odds on some middle-age+ people cleaning up some of these younger "last winner" generation types, I know who I'd put my money on.
 

tytlyf

Not Religious
I wouldn't deny that he's basically an entertainer, but that he's not gay is pretty silly. He used to have several photos of him in bed (though covered) with some of his various partners on twitter, at least when he had one. Esh, the guy radiates gay like the sun creates bright light, lol. Would you like to debate whether the sky is blue, or that water is wet? :D

I find this amazingly humorous.. If someone is gay and conservative then logically they must not be REALLY gay. It's simply IMPOSSIBLE. :tearsofjoy::tearsofjoy::tearsofjoy::tearsofjoy::tearsofjoy::tearsofjoy::tearsofjoy::tearsofjoy:
? He even had an interview with someone the past few years where he denied it. I doubt there are any photos of him out in public with his husband/lover. Kissing, holding hands, etc. I just need something.
 

Saint Frankenstein

Here for the ride
Premium Member
Source rejected. Anything else?
Why is the source rejected? I think it's a great article. It would make sense that it's all an act, honestly. It is rather ridiculous.

Also, why do you defend him so much? Is it because you have the hots for him? (Honey, he ain't that good looking.) His views are thoroughly disgusting. He's a racist, sexist pig as well as a self-hating gay homophobe and transphobe.

Milo Yiannopoulos - RationalWiki
Why did the University of Minnesota Host a Neo-Nazi Rally?
 
Last edited:

QuestioningMind

Well-Known Member
Over the past week I have seen these spoiled brat children, leftist anarchists rioting and destroying public property which is illegal. Most of them have no idea what the hell they are rioting about, a lot of them are professional anarchists and paid moronic rioters. Protesting is one thing, rioting and destroying private property is another. I suggest president Donald Trump send in the military when these idiots start rioting and destroying private and tax payer property and disperse these anarchists with tear gas bombs or more.

These fools who ever they are need to realize that the United States of America is a land of law and order, liberty and freedom, and if they can't handle, accept, conform to our laws then they should move and devote themselves to socialist/anarchist nations which they claim to aspire to. I personally think they are all for the most part full of s**t! And for you idiots who support these socialist anarchists, don't even think I am going to debate you on this, your not worthy!!

I am sickened and appalled by all of it!

I have to wonder if you respond in similar fashion to the rightest anarchists like Bundy and his ilk when they blatantly flout the established laws by refusing to pay grazing fees, violently occupying public land, and threatening officers of the law when they attempt to enforce the laws of the land.
 

QuestioningMind

Well-Known Member
I know why the riots are happening, and... We should arrest those that were violent and causing harm.

I agree with the womens March. I agree with various protests concerning Trump's agenda but I can't agree with the Berkeley protest. What they're effectively doing is protesting free speech. I don't agree with alt right. I abhore it but like me they have the right to free speech.

I agree with everything you say, except perhaps your contention that you can't agree with the Berkeley protests. Are you saying you disagree with the protester's position or with their right to protest against a public institution providing the forum for this particular individual's free speech? Personally I'd let them speak, since I think universities should be a place for the free exchange of ideas no matter how offensive, but at the same time I fully support other people's right to protest against it.
 

YmirGF

Bodhisattva in Recovery
Why is the source rejected? I think it's a great article. It would make sense that it's all an act, honestly. It is rather ridiculous.

Also, why do you defend him so much? Is it because you have the hots for him? (Honey, he ain't that good looking.) His views are thoroughly disgusting. He's a racist, sexist pig as well as a self-hating gay homophobe and transphobe.

Milo Yiannopoulos - RationalWiki
Why did the University of Minnesota Host a Neo-Nazi Rally?
I've rejected that article due to it being largely speculative. Though extremely well written, it's very foundation is more than a bit shaky.

I am neither going to defend Milo to you or anyone else. I don't care what he says. He has a right to say what the thinks and a right to be heard... just like you... just like me. (It's a really very basic concept.)

I don't think I even made it to the end of the first paragraph of the so-called "rational' wiki page. It struck me as ever so slightly biased - just a teeny bit.
Your 2nd source is seriously unhinged. A Tumblr blogger? Serously? Rejected. My guess is anyone the special snowflake doesn't like is a likely Neo-Nazi. The things that pass as evidence these days.


Look, I've listened to several of his talks. He is really quite hilarious. I have never heard him utter a single racist comment though he does seem to have issues with the BlackLiveMatter folks. I have never heard him say anything that was particularly sexist though he has been pretty frank about some third wave feminist leaders. I've never seen him even slightly resemble a cute little pig. A self-hating gay homophobe? Seriously? He seems rather loud and proud to me. And no, I have not heard him even mention trans issues.

My basic working idea is, "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it" - Evelyn Beatrice Hall

It would appear the idea has fallen out of favor in recent years.... and what a great pity that is.
 
Last edited:

Saint Frankenstein

Here for the ride
Premium Member
Look, I've listened to several of his talks. He is really quite hilarious. I have never heard him utter a single racist comment though he does seem to have issues with the BlackLiveMatter folks. I have never heard him say anything that was particularly sexist though he has been pretty frank about some third wave feminist leaders. I've never seen him even slightly resemble a cute little pig. A self-hating gay homophobe? Seriously? He seems rather loud and proud to me. And no, I have not heard him even mention trans issues.
You need to take another look at that RationalWiki article. Yes, he is self-hating and transphobic. He's also sexist. The Tumblr blog was just posting things he has posted.
 
Top