Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
And Nameless is one tooTruth has many names.
Bhagawat Dharma is another name for 'vaishnavism'. There are Shivas and Shaktas too. Don't give incorrect information on internet.Bhagvat Dharm is the original name.
Bhagawat Dharma is another name for 'vaishnavism'.
My wife has trouble accepting Hinduism as anything but an "Indian" religion. The Gods and ideas are incredibly foreign to a monotheistic west.
To be honest when I look around my people reading a translation, of a translation, of a translation of holy books called the bible. They go to church once a week or so. They hate gays and believe anyone not Christian is going to burn for all eternity in hell. They've been raised this way their entire life. They're not evil people. They don't blow themselves up, murder, kill or burn people but they are very fortified in their world view and have a culture of "If its not Christianity its wrong".
Hinduism is one of those things in my opinion that you stumble upon during life and either go "Wow very interesting let me research" or you just xenophobically abhor it and let your views be formed by stereotypes and false opinions. Unless you have a questing mind or are born IN the culture you'll probably have a hard time accepting or studying Hinduism.
Where free thought and liberal minded idea flourish (In America its on the coast lines) you see alot more Hinduism, Buddhism, jainism etc.
Thats one of the reaosn im incredibly surprised that we have a Hindu Temple and a ISCON temple in my state (Tennessee) which is an INCREDIBLY Christian dominant, Republican state.
Can't say i agree with anything that considers itself as Evangelists. One of the cornerstone of Hinduism is live and let live, but it is not a bad thing to have a few converted every now and then.
BAPS (Swaminarayan) exhibits all that as the same thing. The sad thing is, a lot of ISCKON followers have come on here before and told me that my belief in Swaminarayan is wrong, and that is just not Hindu at all. No Hindu can tell another that their belief is wrong.
It shows the variety and diversity of Hinduism.
Great postOne is not a follower of ISKCON... I am a follower of Lord Chaitanya, who is an incarnation of Radha-Krishna for this Age.
The only reason why I say Evangelicals (not Evangelists... that means a spreader of the Christian Gospel; Evangelical refers to a denomination of Christianity which is stereotypically found to be preachy and enthusiastic of their Faith, as well as personally based) is because we, out of the rest of Vaishnavism, are quite outreaching and spreading. But we do not really believe in 'converting' as people may say.
But it is sad that people are saying that Swaminarayan beliefs are wrong. Anyone who claims to be a Vaishnava and is a follower of the sampradaya should be considered as a Vaishnava. Swaminarayan people are Vaishnavas just like us; we may not agree on everything, but we can say for sure that Vishnu/Krishna is God, lol.
Vaishnavism is fine to be in. We do not care what kind of Vaishnavism one practices, as long as one practices the main tenets of the religion. I think theonly people that Gaudiya Vaishnavas have problems with, are atheists.
When I was in my late 20's, I considered Hinduism, but I thought I couldnt convert because I'm not Indian. Asking out of curiosity, how would someone go about becoming an Hindu ?