spacemonkey
Pneumatic Spiritualist
Anyone who says that people don't use cash, how can you explain the $5000 - $10000 CASH deposits I make EVERYDAY as a restraunt manager?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
You are a restaurant manager, that's why. I'm still in college, you rarely use cash in college, maybe for laundry and that is about it. Credit/Debit cards and cheques are much easier to carry around and ten time more convienient.Anyone who says that people don't use cash, how can you explain the $5000 - $10000 CASH deposits I make EVERYDAY as a restraunt manager?
Cash ? what is that ?............................oh, yes, I remember..no, don't use that.SoyLeche said:It would be interesting to see the difference between purchases made with cash and those without. I would be willing to bet that there are a LOT more purchases these days without, but I could be wrong.
...and if we continue on past the bearded lizard-woman we come to our final, most mind bending attraction: the "man-o-no-god"! Amaze yourself at his arguments for a godless, humanistic society! Be astounded at his insistance for freethought! But for the faint of heart beware and turn away when his forked tongue snaps out and..."joeboonda said:I still do not understand how anyone could not believe in God, its, well, unbelievable.
Most all believed in some sort of god or other, yes. However, as you may already know, most were deists. Also, your premise says 'freedom of religion.' How is it promoting freedom of religion to put IN GOD WE TRUST on the bills? Many Americans believe in Allah; many believe in Brahma, Shiva, and Vishnu; some harbor pagan beliefs, and many more hold almost none. 'God' implies only one, and we all know who that one is... that's not really promoting freedom of religion at all, and it is a very narrowminded argument to say that America was founded by Christians, therefore we should all acknowledge ourselves as a Christian nation.Our country was founded because people wanted to worship God how they chose, it was founded on freedom of religion, not freedom from religion. The founding fathers acknowledged that all men were CREATED equally, and most all believed in God.
Yes, it is a part of our country's heritage. So is the systematic slaughter of Indians; shall we put "We killed a whole lot of innocent people who were technically here first" on the dollar bill?God and the Bible is part of our countries heritage, I think it is a huge mistake to turn our backs on the God who is our helper.
America is not a 'majority rules' system. We are a nation based on freedom, equality, and liberty. Simply saying that the majority of people believe in something, therefore it goes, is an endorsement of quite a few less-than-ethical occurrences throughout history... slavery is among them, as was the Holocaust.I recognize the rights of people to worship or not worship, believe or not believe in any way, in any thing they wish, but I believe we should leave God on our currency and our pledge of allegiance, you don't have to believe in him or say 'under God' if you don't want to, but most of us do believe and do want to.
Name these principles. Name them. Then tell me how they're 'godly' and could not have come about as a result of reasoning on the part of human beings.Most people believe in some sort of God (or gods or goddess), some are not sure, and some just do not believe. We do not force anyone to believe, we just say our country and its laws were founded on Godly principles.
Then you are on the right forum. Open your mind and listen to what atheists have to say. Be critical of your own religion if you want to understand our point of view.I still do not understand how anyone could not believe in God, its, well, unbelievable. Just my thoughts, ya don't have to agree.
Sure there is. Both you and Aqualung made the point that since you don't use cash, cash must not be a major form of currency anymore (or must be second to plastic). You may not have meant to make it, which is understandable, but that's what it looks like to me.Whoa. I'm sorry, no need to get all up in arms.
Yeah, cash is used a lot. But it's not used a lot by each individual person. It passes hands really quickly. That's why the life of the average $1 bill is so short. Nobody has it their hands for very long, so it goes through a lot of roughage. And I take that sentence about college back. I haven't used cash very much in my entire life.Fatmop said:"Got to college?" AHA! If you're still in college, then yeah, it's safe to assume you don't use cash. However, you didn't really address my point: cash is used. A lot. Average life of a $1 bill is 18 months, and it is extremely fluid.
Because every once in a while a person will go to a restaurant. There may be a lot of money in circulatino, but the people who use that cash are "circulating" too.spacemonkey said:Anyone who says that people don't use cash, how can you explain the $5000 - $10000 CASH deposits I make EVERYDAY as a restraunt manager?
Yes, it does pass hands quickly. Very quickly. Was it you who was making the point that not very many people would see the cross-outs because people don't use cash anymore, or was that someone else?It passes hands really quickly.
That was me. It passes hands quickly because people don't have it for very long (duh.). People get cash to make a small purchase, make that purchase, and then don't have cash again til they need it. That's why it passes hands so quickly - because people don't use it much.Fatmop said:Yes, it does pass hands quickly. Very quickly. Was it you who was making the point that not very many people would see the cross-outs because people don't use cash anymore, or was that someone else?
Fatmop said:Sure there is. Both you and Aqualung made the point that since you don't use cash, cash must not be a major form of currency anymore (or must be second to plastic). You may not have meant to make it, which is understandable, but that's what it looks like to me.
OK, I am not going to agree. You can't have freedom of religion without freedom from religion. I can't figure out how anyone can seriously believe otherwise. Are you saying that everyone except atheists deserves to have their rights respected by the government? Maybe we should have mandatory loyalty oaths to God, and whoever doesn't take that oath would go to jail. We can also have mandatory taxes to fund any church we please. So atheists have to donate to churches whether they like it or not. That would be freedom of religion, too, at least by the standards of "freedom of religion, not freedom from religion."joeboonda said:Our country was founded because people wanted to worship God how they chose, it was founded on freedom of religion, not freedom from religion. The founding fathers acknowledged that all men were CREATED equally, and most all believed in God. God and the Bible is part of our countries heritage, I think it is a huge mistake to turn our backs on the God who is our helper. I recognize the rights of people to worship or not worship, believe or not believe in any way, in any thing they wish, but I believe we should leave God on our currency and our pledge of allegiance, you don't have to believe in him or say 'under God' if you don't want to, but most of us do believe and do want to. Most people believe in some sort of God (or gods or goddess), some are not sure, and some just do not believe. We do not force anyone to believe, we just say our country and its laws were founded on Godly principles. I still do not understand how anyone could not believe in God, its, well, unbelievable. Just my thoughts, ya don't have to agree. Peace.
Someone earlier said the 50's and I belive that is correctbeckysoup61 said:I agree with Apostate Abe. It doesn't show up at all in the constitution at all. One question, when did it show up on our money, btw? Sorry if I missed that part of the conversation. I think if the "Under God" was recent(being last 150 years), we need to take it off, but if it was on the original money, why not leave it there?
It seems it took an act of Congress in order to make the change.Dear Sir: You are about to submit your annual report to the Congress respecting the affairs of the national finances. One fact touching our currency has hitherto been seriously overlooked. I mean the recognition of the Almighty God in some form on our coins.
You are probably a Christian. What if our Republic were not shattered beyond reconstruction? Would not the antiquaries of succeeding centuries rightly reason from our past that we were a heathen nation? What I propose is that instead of the goddess of liberty we shall have next inside the 13 stars a ring inscribed with the words PERPETUAL UNION; within the ring the allseeing eye, crowned with a halo; beneath this eye the American flag, bearing in its field stars equal to the number of the States united; in the folds of the bars the words GOD, LIBERTY, LAW.
This would make a beautiful coin, to which no possible citizen could object. This would relieve us from the ignominy of heathenism. This would place us openly under the Divine protection we have personally claimed. From my hearth I have felt our national shame in disowning God as not the least of our present national disasters.
To you first I address a subject that must be agitated.
Pluralistic would be the word to use if you're referring to many different religions found in our country. Secular would refer to the government and how our laws should be written and enforced.beckysoup61 said:Interesting, a bit of history I did not know. I'm still slightly divided over this issue. Part of me wants to say take it off, this is a polyreligion(is that the right word?) country.....