Tmac
Active Member
When was this time? The Cretaceous Period?
No, as recent as your youth or do you think you were born a hypocrite?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
When was this time? The Cretaceous Period?
Hypocrisy is a person expecting the world to be a certain way but unwilling or unable to do the same themselves. I'd say not healthy.Believe nothing of what you hear and only half of what you see, do as I say not as I do, no doesn't always mean no, all sired by hypocrisy. This is the minefield into which we are born. These are the lessons we teach tomorrow. There is no exception to "we".
To be oblivious to tomorrow is an indication to the degree by which one could measure the understanding and awareness of the God in which we claim to believe.
What is the origin of hypocrisy and why did we create it?
Do you think we should let hypocrisy pass into tomorrow?
We are the creators and gate keepers of tomorrow, it has never happened before, its a clean canvass.
Hypocrisy is a person expecting the world to be a certain way but unwilling or unable to do the same themselves. I'd say not healthy.
I wasn't taught to be hypocritical. Not seen many people who are hypocrites either. You have a different experience?The simpleness of your definition is beautiful, thank you, you helped me see it in its parts, no baggage, emotional or moral.
I would change 'unwilling or unable' to not hold themselves to the same expectations. We are taught, from the earliest age to be hypocritical and it is validated by the very society we live in. This is where Jesus would say some thing like forgive them for the know not what they do. Humanity as a whole is probably at its adolescent stage and we're still learning but teacher's are few and far between.
No, as recent as your youth or do you think you were born a hypocrite?
What is the origin of hypocrisy and why did we create it?
Do you think we should let hypocrisy pass into tomorrow?
(...)
What is the origin of hypocrisy and why did we create it?
I think we're so use to hypocrisy we frame it as a joke in order to remain sane.
No, hypocrisy is not healthy at all. Also, it hurts other people besides oneself.
Mainly as a misguided attempt to deal with insecurity.
I wasn't taught to be hypocritical. Not seen many people who are hypocrites either. You have a different experience?
I am questioning your presumption that hypocrisy is a widespread trait and a widely practiced trait among people.Are you trying to tell me that ignorance is bliss?
It used to said that the difference between H sap and the other animals was that we had a monopoly on hypocrisy.What is the origin of hypocrisy and why did we create it?
I am questioning your presumption that hypocrisy is a widespread trait and a widely practiced trait among people.
What is the origin of hypocrisy and why did we create it?
"widely practiced behavior" . Using trait twice was a mistake.And I am questioning your honesty; I feel as though you are deliberately being obtuse.
(I don't think trait is used properly in this instance.)
I think there's a difference between hypocrisy and changes in views brought about through circumstances and dynamics by which a person would oppose his former position.
Sometimes it's hard to distinguish that.
"widely practiced behavior" . Using trait twice was a mistake.
Why do you think I am being obtuse? I don't believe hypocrisy is rampant in humans. Most people I know or have interact with have not been hypocritical in what they say and do and how they lead their lives. Do you have any actual evidence to claim otherwise as you are doing on this thread?
Why would wanting others to be happy obligate a person to work to secure that happiness for others? One may want others to be happy through their own effort believing each person is ultimately responsible for their own life and how it goes.Would you say that the people you interact with love one another, that is to say that they want everyone to be as happy as they are? Now the question becomes what is understood by "everyone" and just how far are they willing to go to see that "everyone" is experiencing this happiness.
The difference is hypocrisy.
Why would wanting others to be happy obligate a person to work to secure that happiness for others? One may want others to be happy through their own effort believing each person is ultimately responsible for their own life and how it goes.
Your subjective opinion. You are welcome to it. What does this have to do with hypocrisy? It seemed you changed the topic. Why should one believe your premise that hypocrisy is widespread among people? Your first response was rebutted.As to the first part, happiness, real happiness, wants to experienced by everyone and the one that experiences true happiness is one with it, no obligation or work, happiness can not be secured, only experienced.
As to the second part, no one will ever experience life and all that is within it, as I have and yet all lives are full. We all start equal but we all don't start from the same position.