It seems you did not read the entirety of this thread yet because if you did, then you would realize that my undecided mindset regarding the claimed evidence has nothing to do with my disagreement with God's moral standards. I am undecided simply because I am undecided and I have searched, but have found no definite answer.
However, my disagreement with God's moral standards and my justifications in the arguments I have presented here for this disagreement has me leaning a bit towards Christianity being nonsense. So I am in an undecided mindset leaning a bit towards Christianity being nonsense. Since there is just no way for me to make a decision based on all the claimed evidence out there, then I wasn't here to debate the validity of the evidence. Rather, I was here to simply debate the moral nature of God.
I cannot debate the validity of the evidence since I am not a scientist or a highly intelligent person who is any good at that. I would have to have a lot of knowledge of science to, for example, attempt to refute the claimed evidence regarding the Shroud of Turin. Not to mention, it would take a lot of scientific knowledge on my part (which I do not have) to even comprehend the types of arguments people are making for and against the Shroud of Turin in scientific terms.
But I am not a trained scientist or philosopher. However, when it comes to debating something that is an intrinsic and valuable part of my life which would be the concept of morality, then I am all for debating that and am good at debating that.
I have my own moral standard that I would gladly put up a debate against the Christian God's moral standard. So I will continue to do that right now here in this very post. Therefore, I would like to continue by saying that it doesn't matter who you are. I don't care if you are famous, have high status/wealth, are a genius, have made a loving sacrifice for me and for others, or if you are the all powerful creator of the universe. That gives you no authority over my life or over the lives of others.
To just barge and intrude into my life or into the lives of others, judge our ways of living as sinful, and tell us that we must obey or go to hell and never get out, then that is serious disrespect and is cruel. It doesn't matter who you are--I will treat you as being any other normal human being out there in the world who is expected to show respect towards the values and personal lives of others.
Each person has his/her life to live and God should be no exception. He should keep to his own life, not intrude into the lives of others, show respect, and not judge us as sinful. I mean, I could understand it if I was someone cruel harming and torturing others. I would agree then that there should be some intervention for something like that. But as long as I am not doing that, then there is no reason to intrude into my personal life, tell me that I am going to hell if I don't do this and that, and that I am a sinner.
There is no justified reason why someone like me should go to hell in the first place. A truly all loving, all just, and morally righteous God would welcome someone like me into his heavenly kingdom after looking upon my life here on Earth and respecting my way of life since it imposed no harm/torture upon others. But if there was harm and torture imposed, then they would be trivial matters such as yelling at my mother. But nothing serious deserving of an eternal hell of torment. Not that I agree such a place should exist in the first place for anybody regardless of how wicked they are.
Lastly, even if someone was somehow deserving of an eternal torment in hell, then the moment they go there, my love would compel me to get them out. My love would simply not allow them to remain there. It would be asinine, absurd, and daft of me to just sit there and weep over them and not get them out of hell when I am an all powerful God who can. But if I were to laugh, rejoice, become apathetic, etc. towards this person's eternal torment in hell, then I would just be plain vile and cruel.