EnhancedSpirit said:
I believe in creationism, but I do not believe in a young earth. And just because science can explain why and how a baby is born, does not take away from the miracle of life.
Believe as you will, but the birth of a new being (human, animal, plant, fish, etc.) is hardly miraculous - it occurs at an incredible rate all over this planet. How miraculous is that?
Passerbye said:
And evolutionists started with the idea, derived from similarities in animals, seen along time ago, that animals all came from each other. They are starting the same way, just from a different point.
Not even close.
Passerbye said:
Evolution started with an idea, blew it up, got rid of the information it was all based on it before, and replaced it with other information to keep it going, and it has kept on going since.
Your ignorance of the Theory of Evolution, and how it has "evolved" over time, is astonishing. Not surprising, but astonishing.
Passerbye said:
Cristianity started before scientific data like that was even started to be collected. It has stayed the same over time, and has not been disproven since it's start.
You mean "My version of Christianity". You should not presume to speak for all Christians on any subject - much less when discussing evolution. The majority of Christians embrace evolution - due to their ability to objectively consider the mountains of evidence that support it. Your insistence upon a literal view of the Bible is not universal to all Christians.
Passerbye said:
I believe it because I trust it, and my faith in it hasn't failed me. The Bible states, faith first. Now I am not the most faithful person in the world, but I am not given any reasons not to believe in God.
Exactly, Passerbye. You believe as you do, based on revealed faith - not scientific evidence that supports some wild concept of how life on earth came to be what is. You can (and should) believe as you wish - I'm only asking that you stop trying to justify your beliefs by intentionally misunderstanding what science teaches us. When that intentional intellectual dishonesty goes unchallenged, it leads to people wanting to teach religion in a science class.
EnhancedSpirit said:
You think, therefore you are.
Cute. Vapid, but cute.
EnhancedSpirit said:
Everything in the universe evolved from the elements we know as the periodic table. Can we agree on this?
No, we can't. We have no way of knowing that the elements that exist on earth represent the entire gamut of what is available throughout the universe. It is entirely possible that other elements exist in solar systems with a double sun, or near a black hole.
EnhancedSpirit said:
Can you agree that the elements that make up the body you are in have been around since the beginning of 'creation'?
I can surmise that this is true, but I have no evidence.
EnhancedSpirit said:
Is it an accident that those molecules have continued to form the material world then seperate and reform into something else. This is what science has proven. This cannot all be an accident. It's too precise in it's design.
Yes, it can be an accident. There are BILLIONS of stars in the universe - with an unimaginable number of planets orbiting them. Over the BILLIONS of years that the universe has existed, it is not only possible that it is an accident, it approaches a certainty - and probably has occurred more than once. If our corner of the universe is "designed", I'd say the designer was having a bad day.
EnhancedSpirit said:
Trust me guys, I was an atheist and science taught me otherwise. It is bigger than you can imagine
Trust me - I'm an agnostic, and science has given me absolutely no reason at all to believe in Paul Bunyan or God.