I challenge the world , bring it on!

[Subduction Zone]

I have ten years or so of science forum experience, I have many teachers and many thoughts . I look for absolute, there is no margin of error in absolute . I use undeniable logic.

Then quit babbling and start proving.

By the way, you should be asking for more details on why your experiment failed. Just admit that you did not understand and I will go into more detail. Anyone that understood the sciences would understand the explanation that I gave.

 

[james blunt]

Science don't deal with miracles, please explain how nothingness can make matter?

If I told you that in intricate details , would I have anything left to give ?

I would be ''dead'' , no hope of a book offer where I could earn some survival money.

 

[james blunt]

Then quit babbling and start proving.

By the way, you should be asking for more details on why your experiment failed. Just admit that you did not understand and I will go into more detail. Anyone that understood the sciences would understand the explanation that I gave.

You have not give any details where it fails, because it does not fail, I can also replace the balloon with a Quantum field and do the experiment, same result.

 

[Subduction Zone]

If I told you that in intricate details , would I have anything left to give ?

I would be ''dead'' , no hope of a book offer where I could earn some survival money.

I can guarantee you that no book offer is in the future for you.

But nice excuse for your inability to support your claims.

 

[james blunt]

I can guarantee you that no book offer is in the future for you.

But nice excuse for your inability to support your claims.

Your a fortune teller? I think not. Nice try , but you are not getting it for totally free.

 

[Subduction Zone]

You have not give any details where it fails, because it does not fail, I can also replace the balloon with a Quantum field and do the experiment, same result.

Wrong again, the details were there. You merely did not understand them.

Here they are again, I will separate it out for you a little bit:

The size of your experiment is too small.

The margin of error of any measurement would be far larger than the expansion that you are trying to measure.

What part do you not understand?

 

[Subduction Zone]

Your a fortune teller? I think not. Nice try , but you are not getting it for totally free.

One does not need to be a fortune teller to see the obvious.

 

[FearGod]

If I told you that in intricate details , would I have anything left to give ?

I would be ''dead'' , no hope of a book offer where I could earn some survival money.

You have no answer, you failed.

 

[james blunt]

The size of your experiment is too small.

The margin of error of any measurement would be far larger than the expansion that you are trying to measure.

What part do you not understand?

Which part of , what you are posting is irrelevant, I can place the experiment anywhere in the Universe and the result will be a repeat outcome, do you not understand?

It does not cost all these trillions of dollars to do science , it can be done cheaply in some circumstances.

Ligo detects field fluctuations not space fluctuations, you know very little.

 

[james blunt]

You have no answer, you failed.

I know , lets set up forums on the internet so all the members of the public openly give their ideas away so we can exploit this and it costs us nothing. We can then use this information to create new things and ideas and look really smart to justify our huge spending on the secret base where we will be safe from the apocalypse.

Nice try.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Which part of , what you are posting is irrelevant, I can place the experiment anywhere in the Universe and the result will be a repeat outcome, do you not understand?

It does not cost all these trillions of dollars to do science , it can be done cheaply in some circumstances.

Ligo detects field fluctuations not space fluctuations, you know very little.

But that is no true. We can observe the expansion of space. Your cheap experiment failed for the reasons given.

Once again, what part did you not understand? There was nothing irrelevant there.


And I did not even bring up LIGO, Why the red herring? Do you realize how badly you have failed?

 

[Subduction Zone]

I know , lets set up forums on the internet so all the members of the public openly give their ideas away so we can exploit this and it costs us nothing. We can then use this information to create new things and ideas and look really smart to justify our huge spending on the secret base where we will be safe from the apocalypse.

Nice try.

You made obviously bogus claims. You can't support them. You expect people to take you seriously and that is rather ridiculous.

 

[james blunt]

We can observe the expansion of space.

No, you observe the contraction of light.

 

[james blunt]

You made obviously bogus claims. You can't support them. You expect people to take you seriously and that is rather ridiculous.

Bogus claims is your subjective denial of proofs.

 

[Subduction Zone]

No, you observe the contraction of light.

Nope. The light does not contract. What makes you think that it is what occurs? In fact, do you know what would happen if the light actually "contracted"?

Your 'science' is backwards as usual.

 

[james blunt]

Pick up your box with your inflated balloon in it and move the box.

You can move the box, the balloon, the air in the balloon , but you cannot move the space. There is a different space inside the balloon when you have moved it. Logical fact.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Bogus claims is your subjective denial of proofs.

You are the one that started this thread with the title "I challenge the world, bring it on". You could not even meet the very minor challenges that you have received here. That is why we know that your claims are bogus. And I already explained why your experiment was bogus. Unfortunately a less than high school level of science comprehension keeps you from being able to understand the refutation.

 

[james blunt]

Nope. The light does not contract. What makes you think that it is what occurs? In fact, do you know what would happen if the light actually "contracted"?

Your 'science' is backwards as usual.

Actually my science is the correct way around. Light traversing through space is a longer wave-length than reflected light, reflected light been a shorter contracted wave-length relative to the light permeating through space.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Pick up your box with your inflated balloon in it and move the box.

You can move the box, the balloon, the air in the balloon , but you cannot move the space. There is a different space inside the balloon when you have moved it. Logical fact.

Still so full of fail.

Do you even know what a frame of reference is? Logic is a tool missing from your toolbox.

 

[james blunt]

Still so full of fail.

Do you even know what a frame of reference is? Logic is a tool missing from your toolbox.

The space is the frame of reference , the box moves relative to space, you do not know much do you?