I challenge the world , bring it on!

[james blunt]

If as Polymath25 states time and space must be thought of as a continuum to make sense what makes time the driving factor in the .

Δk0 = Δ E = t

Δ t = Δ S

Δ S = Δ t

That's why

 

[Polymath257]

I think you have the right idea.

Just for your edification, Sustainer is Theorist, last seen as loverbal on sciforums, from which he was banned after starting this thread: How many dimensions fit in a point? | Page 2 | Sciforums

If you take a look you will see the same stuff and the same method. Of course there it was a science forum, so they got rid of him. (On April 14th actually, the same day he joined here.)

Here I don't know what view they take. But he is a terrible timewaster and nobody will ever get any sense out of him, or get him to stop. The only way is not to respond.

You are probably right....no audience, no troll.

 

[Polymath257]

Δk0 = Δ E = t

Δ t = Δ S

Δ S = Δ t

That's why

None of which is even close to true

 

[james blunt]

I think you have the right idea.

Just for your edification, Sustainer is Theorist, last seen as loverbal on sciforums, from which he was banned after starting this thread: How many dimensions fit in a point? | Page 2 | Sciforums

If you take a look you will see the same stuff and the same method. Of course there it was a science forum, so they got rid of him. (On April 14th actually, the same day he joined here.)

Here I don't know what view they take. But he is a terrible timewaster and nobody will ever get any sense out of him, or get him to stop. The only way is not to respond.

I will refer to you as the Devil here, I predicted you arrival.


Do you wish to battle with God on the science battle field ?


You can't impose cognitive control here and you can't be dishonest like you are in your hell science forums.

 

[james blunt]

None of which is even close to true

Yes they are, I can see I have no chance, I can see you ''work'' for them. Do not ban me for the reasons of your faith, they want to kill God .

 

[Woberts]

Interesting how people try to stop the truth.

Yes, That's exactly what I'm doing.

 

[JoshuaTree]

You are probably right....no audience, no troll.

I see this thread no different than discussion between creationists and scientists, neither will yield. I find the contents of this thread thought provoking in that given some of the radical viewpoints presented I am less inhibited to think out-loud, the more of that that goes on beneifits everyone as long as everyone plays nice of course.

 

[james blunt]

@ex-chemist

Δk0 = Δ E = t

ZPE , do you disagree?

 

[james blunt]

But e may not agree as to what all is 'the present'. That s the basic point: simultaneity is not a fixed concept.

Simultaneity is based on the clock not space.

 

[Polymath257]

Yes they are, I can see I have no chance, I can see you ''work'' for them. Do not ban me for the reasons of your faith, they want to kill God .

Once again, you won't be banned unless you go against the rules. Mainly, the rules are that you should be polite and not attack another personally, just their ideas.

 

[Polymath257]

I will refer to you as the Devil here, I predicted you arrival.


Do you wish to battle with God on the science battle field ?


You can't impose cognitive control here and you can't be dishonest like you are in your hell science forums.

Be careful...that can be regarded as a rule 1 violation....just being helpful.

 

[james blunt]

Once again, you won't be banned unless you go against the rules. Mainly, the rules are that you should be polite and not attack another personally, just their ideas.

My respect Sir, I always do that but still manage to be banned from forums because ex chemist and his ''friends'' pressure moderators to ban me. I suspect Exchemist will now back away from the challenge.

 

[james blunt]

Be careful...that can be regarded as a rule 1 violation....just being helpful.

Ok, my apologies.

 

[Polymath257]

My respect Sir, I always do that but still manage to be banned from forums because ex chemist and his ''friends'' pressure moderators to ban me. I suspect Exchemist will now back away from the challenge.

And again, on a science forum, you would only be a disruption: you have no real science to discuss.

Here, it is normal playing with ideas.

 

[Polymath257]

I see this thread no different than discussion between creationists and scientists, neither will yield. I find the contents of this thread thought provoking in that given some of the radical viewpoints presented I am less inhibited to think out-loud, the more of that that goes on beneifits everyone as long as everyone plays nice of course.

And that is why I continue, actually. The ideas are ones that are commonly misunderstood. Having even a bad stimulus can lead to interesting conversations.

 

[YmirGF]

Yes, That's exactly what I'm doing.

Actually what most of us here are trying to do it preserve the integrity of truth that @Sustainer is so intent on butchering with his highly delusional outlook that does not even approach being representative of reality.

 

[james blunt]

And again, on a science forum, you would only be a disruption: you have no real science to discuss.

Here, it is normal playing with ideas.

So if you think I have no real science to discuss, then If I attempt to re-create the big bang, you will have nothing to fear because I will fail right?


I know more physics than all of you, but I can see the thread is now over run by the people trying to silence me .

 

[JoshuaTree]

I'm guessing I'm correct that relativity states that time slows near a heavier body apparently due to gravity. So time and gravity are somehow linked according to relativity. In the beginning (in current big bang theology) all the stuff was close(er) together and the balloon was smaller so gravity was greater anywhere on the surface of the balloon and time was slower according to relativity. Seems to me the expansion of space drives time rather than the other way around. As time becomes faster and faster the distance light covers becomes less and less so light (photons) from far distance points become more and more delayed. If it is expansion of space that drives time wouldn't the age of the universe currently inferred by constant time and perhaps varying light speed be very wrong?

Just to humor me can anyone here comment as to how old the universe might be if time was considered a variable? I think scientists consider time constant from now back unto the beginning but if time in the beginning was a lot slower then time in the now then based on "now time" the universe could be infinitely older than predicted.

 

[james blunt]

I'm guessing I'm correct that relativity states that time slows near a heavier body apparently due to gravity. So time and gravity are somehow linked according to relativity. In the beginning (in current big bang theology) all the stuff was close(er) together and the balloon was smaller so gravity was greater anywhere on the surface of the balloon and time was slower according to relativity. Seems to me the expansion of space drives time rather than the other way around. As time becomes faster and faster the distance light covers becomes less and less so light (photons) from far distance points become more and more delayed. If it is expansion of space that drives time wouldn't the age of the universe currently inferred by constant time and perhaps varying light speed be very wrong?

Just to humor me can anyone here comment as to how old the universe might be if time was considered a variable? I think scientists consider time constant from now back unto the beginning but if time in the beginning was a lot slower then time in the now then based on "now time" the universe could be infinitely older than predicted.

You understand it quite correctly sir.

 

[Polymath257]

So if you think I have no real science to discuss, then If I attempt to re-create the big bang, you will have nothing to fear because I will fail right?

I have no concerns about that.

I know more physics than all of you, but I can see the thread is now over run by the people trying to silence me .

Well, I strongly doubt that based on what you wrote above. You confuse entropy and energy. You confuse both with time.