I challenge the world , bring it on!

[james blunt]

Good luck. Tell me, how much math did these people tell you? Can you even explain something as simple as a tangent or a secant?

I learnt myself the math I needed for my specific theories. As for a cos , sin, tan etc, I have not even tried to learn to remember that math. Could I learn it? Yes if I wanted to , a few youtube videos and a few questions , away I would go.

In saying that a little story, one forum once asked if I could calculate the angle of a point , was given the dimensions and the position, I overlayed a protractor , how easy was that . No math needed,

 

[james blunt]

I read what secant is, this would be my start to working it out on my own .

 

[james blunt]

A bit like wallpapering to me , I am a qualified painter and decorator, I use to use dimensions all the time and cut angles etc. So if i wanted to cut half a curved shape in half I would do it that way.

Not all things needs math you know, a stick or a piece of string works wonders sometimes.

There is many different ways to measure something or work something out.

 

[Subduction Zone]

I learnt myself the math I needed for my specific theories. As for a cos , sin, tan etc, I have not even tried to learn to remember that math. Could I learn it? Yes if I wanted to , a few youtube videos and a few questions , away I would go.

In saying that a little story, one forum once asked if I could calculate the angle of a point , was given the dimensions and the position, I overlayed a protractor , how easy was that . No math needed,

So you have no clue as to what you are talking about.

Thanks, I just wanted confirmation.

 

[Polymath257]

Interesting , I am more of a you tube man myself, but I also like to read papers such as Maxwell's equations, The theory of relativity, The electrodynamics of moving bodies.


Hello, I am a father of two, I have spent years learning from scientists off science forums. I have heard many many different opinions and explanations of subjects. My many teachers are the world, I listened to what they said. They taught me how to think about things, an ability I am good at. In learning, I gained the ability to teach and explain the subjects I learnt. My theories developing to have a more solid foundation. I now feel it is the time to set the science records straight, especially in the areas of semantics and understanding of ''their'' own science .
Relative correctness being important.

What was the last partial differential equation solved? What method did you use?

 

[Polymath257]

I learnt myself the math I needed for my specific theories. As for a cos , sin, tan etc, I have not even tried to learn to remember that math. Could I learn it? Yes if I wanted to , a few youtube videos and a few questions , away I would go.

In saying that a little story, one forum once asked if I could calculate the angle of a point , was given the dimensions and the position, I overlayed a protractor , how easy was that . No math needed,

OK, so you don't know the basics. Because, you see, that math that you don't have time to learn..it's the basic stuff that trains you to be able to do the more advanced stuff.

Have you done a triple integral? Solved a differential equation? How about compute the Christoffel symbols for a metric?

if not, then you don't know any physics.

 

[Polymath257]

How exactly is that different from what Sustainer is saying, if we disregard the differences in naming of terms?

Well, part of the difference is that he denies time as a relevant variable. Even with the BB scenario, to go beyond the very first step, you have to allow for slight perturbations in the density of matter (and energy, etc), which makes the 'absolute space' thing trickier again. So, for example, the existence of gravitational waves in the early universe is very relevant for latter structure formation. But even talking about gravitational waves is tricky if you want to maintain some sort of 'absolute space'.

 

[Subduction Zone]

What was the last partial differential equation solved? What method did you use?

You have to be kidding.

ironically DiffyQ was the only math class where I got more than 100%. Just for kicks, and this as the only math course I had where an instructor did this, there was an extra credit question on the final. I did that plus everything else in about half of the allotted time and turned in my test early, while undergoing nasty blades from others. I could not solve an equation today to save my life. Use it or lose it.

 

[Polymath257]

Let me ask you something about your idea of absolute-space time. Imagine starting from Earth, pick any direction, and travel a trillion light years away. At some point after 14 billion light years you will enter "empty" space in your imagination. At a trillion light years away there is no mass and no energy present. As far as we know it is empty space. In the space of nothingness, how do you know time exists?

I would argue without the presence of mass and energy time does not exist. I would even go further in terms of subjective philosophy and argue unless you have a self-aware conscious observer identifying when time begins and end then time does not exist. What is your evidence absolute-space time exists? What is time?

I'd point out that in most formulations of the BB scenario, if you could go a trillion light years out, you would see essentially the same basic picture as what we see here: space expanding and galaxies moving away at speeds approximately proportional to distance (for low speeds).

Those formulations where this is not the case usually suggest different basic constants (fine structure constant, etc).

 

[james blunt]

if not, then you don't know any physics.

Faraday knew very little maths and Maxwell helped Faraday out, Einstein was a nobody until Planck helped him out. There is nothing magic about maths, maths comes after the physics is discovered , not before.

When was the last time you derived your own equation for the beginning of time that works?

In fact is there any of you on here who can create your own equation to something important?

Well I have done this several times now in my time, I did one a while ago using a version of Pi, with this I could convert mph to m/s I think it was. That is about in one of the forums somewhere.

So who can't do maths?

You can't do maths, you can remember how to do some maths, but you can't do maths can you ?

I know physics very well.

p.s I could re-create a big bang for less than £100 , you should worry (jokingly)

 

[james blunt]

I'd point out that in most formulations of the BB scenario, if you could go a trillion light years out, you would see essentially the same basic picture as what we see here: space expanding and galaxies moving away at speeds approximately proportional to distance (for low speeds).

Those formulations where this is not the case usually suggest different basic constants (fine structure constant, etc).

A+B = t

A+B = child

A+B = length

A+B = atom



I could go on and on....A=0.5 B=0.5

Binary systems are systems of two halves

It works Universally Sir.

A+B = GF where G is gravity and F is force


See, I am a genius .......

 

[james blunt]

Well Mr C, you did not put much of a battle up in this thread. I expected much more from my adversary


How about you try this ?

.
k=0

Δk = ΔΕ

E = t

t = xyz

Δxyz = ΔS

ΔS =

 

[Polymath257]

Faraday knew very little maths and Maxwell helped Faraday out, Einstein was a nobody until Planck helped him out. There is nothing magic about maths, maths comes after the physics is discovered , not before.

When was the last time you derived your own equation for the beginning of time that works?

In fact is there any of you on here who can create your own equation to something important?

Well I have done this several times now in my time, I did one a while ago using a version of Pi, with this I could convert mph to m/s I think it was. That is about in one of the forums somewhere.

So who can't do maths?

You can't do maths, you can remember how to do some maths, but you can't do maths can you ?

I know physics very well.

p.s I could re-create a big bang for less than £100 , you should worry (jokingly)

So, you don't understand math, Gotcha. Which means that you don't understand the theories you are rejecting.

A+B = t

A+B = child

A+B = length

A+B = atom



I could go on and on....A=0.5 B=0.5

Binary systems are systems of two halves

It works Universally Sir.

A+B = GF where G is gravity and F is force


See, I am a genius .......

Well Mr C, you did not put much of a battle up in this thread. I expected much more from my adversary


How about you try this ?

.
k=0

Δk = ΔΕ

E = t

t = xyz

Δxyz = ΔS

ΔS =

Which only show your lack of understanding. Writing random formulas isn't the same as using math to understand something.

At least using standard notation, none of those formuals was even close to being correct.

 

[james blunt]

Which only show your lack of understanding. Writing random formulas isn't the same as using math to understand something.

At least using standard notation, none of those formuals was even close to being correct.

So, you don't understand math, Gotcha. Which means that you don't understand the theories you are rejecting. The same likewise applies sir, my maths is relatively simple that explains the Universe.

 

[Polymath257]

So, you don't understand math, Gotcha. Which means that you don't understand the theories you are rejecting. The same likewise applies sir, my maths is relatively simple that explains the Universe.

I understand math quite well, thank you. I did trigonometry when I was 11 and got my PhD in math at 23. I've published a number of papers with original math results. And I have been teaching it for more than 35 years.

I also have done all the coursework for a PhD in physics, including taking the PhD qualifying exams.

I understand quite well you *lack* of anything close to a theory of reality. I understand that the formulas your throw up are random nonsense.

 

[james blunt]

I understand math quite well, thank you. I did trigonometry when I was 11 and got my PhD in math at 23. I've published a number of papers with original math results. And I have been teaching it for more than 35 years.

I also have done all the coursework for a PhD in physics, including taking the PhD qualifying exams.

I understand quite well you *lack* of anything close to a theory of reality. I understand that the formulas your throw up are random nonsense.

Why not ask me about my equations if you do not understand them ?

Then you may just realise they are not nonsense.


k=0

Δk = ΔΕ

E = t

t = xyz

Δxyz = ΔS

ΔS =

Ok what do you not understand of the above formulas?

K = 0 a point of space ok?

 

[Polymath257]

Why not ask me about my equations if you do not understand them ?

Then you may just realise they are not nonsense.


k=0

Δk = ΔΕ

E = t

t = xyz

Δxyz = ΔS

ΔS =

Ok what do you not understand of the above formulas?

K = 0 a point of space ok?

OK, so explain them. Already, your first is nonsense, but please continue.

 

[james blunt]

OK, so explain them. Already, your first is nonsense, but please continue.

k is used for space in mainstream science ,

k=0

then

Δk = ΔΕ

So the change of a point is equal to a change in energy of the point

then

E = t energy is equal to the start of time for the point

then

t=xyz which time is the volume

then

xyz = S which is the volume is equal to its entropy size.

then finally

potential energy photon, divided/shared by the entropy

 

[Polymath257]

k is used for space in mainstream science ,

k=0

then

Δk = ΔΕ

So the change of a point is equal to a change in energy of the point

then

E = t energy is equal to the start of time for the point

then

t=xyz which time is the volume

then

xyz = S which is the volume is equal to its entropy size.

then finally

potential energy photon, divided/shared by the entropy

So, like I said, random nonsense.

 

[dfnj]

A bit like wallpapering to me , I am a qualified painter and decorator, I use to use dimensions all the time and cut angles etc. So if i wanted to cut half a curved shape in half I would do it that way.

Not all things needs math you know, a stick or a piece of string works wonders sometimes.

There is many different ways to measure something or work something out.

You forgot qualified entertainer.