The only difference is my view actually has testimonies and witnesses and yours does not.
First off, witness accounts and personal anecdotes are considered the weakest form of evidence in science, if it is considered evidence at all.
Secondly, I'm not the one making a claim here. I merely said that there is no reason to believe that there is an afterlife.
It's not indoctrination if I accept it as my belief even when I'm old enough to make my own decisions because it makes utter sense to me. I was never ever forced to believe something I didn't want to.
Yes, it is still indoctrination if you were uniformly told to believe one "truth" about the world from a young age. All children wish to please their parents/guardians, and thus they usually will want to listen and believe.
Childhood dogmas are hard to shake off and if given a child to indoctrinate it would be easy to make them believe, for instance, that the colour pink is bad, even as an adult.
Direct Perception. Hundreds of saints have experienced this. There is no way they are all lying.
As mentioned, if considered evidence at all, this is the weakest form of evidence in science. And I didn't say they were lying. I'm sure they believed they saw what they said they saw. I'm just saying that what they saw, or think they saw, were more likely to be hallucinations, perhaps formed by wishful thinking.
These are experiences without any outer or brain influence. True spiritual experiences that comes from superconsciousness. You can choose to believe what you want. Yogi's from different ages and paths have all claimed the same thing. Once again they all can't be lying.
These kinds of sights are well documented and it is strange then that we can reproduce the same experiences by physically influencing the brain.
These experiences have nothing to do with the brain.
And yet, by manipulating the brain we can recreate these experiences.
The only way you could see that evidence is to experience it for yourself.
Oh, I have had hallucinations. But unlike these yogis, or whatever you call them, I did not believe my fevered/drugged/influenced brain.
I suggest you read about people who have died and then come back. Bodies literally flat line for minutes and then their souls come back to testify that there is more beyond this life and body. I would say that's enough for me to know this body is not our only existance.
Again, we can reproduce these experiences and they have nothing to do with anything spiritual and everything to do with a brain under duress.
All the reasons I've already pointed out. My own meditation experiences and others.
Which count for nothing. If I told you I have an invisible dragon living in my apartment, would you believe me?
While atheists like to claim beliefs out of no internal spiritual experimentation, Yogi's actually make the time to experiment within where God and our soul exists.
At least that is what they believe, or, I'm sure, at least in some cases, would like people to believe. That is not evidence however.
It makes no sense to believe something without evidence to back your claim, and I know personally that there is more evidence backing after life than nothingness.
Again, I am not making the claim that there absolutely and certainly is no afterlife. I'm just saying that there is no reason to think there is.
What is your reasoning to believe there is nothing after this life?
Utter and complete lack of evidence.
It seems like this is a baseless assumption that can cause unneeded fear.
It's the same reason you won't believe in my invisible dragon. Lack of evidence. And that is the best reason in the world to disbelieve something.
Also, I am not afraid. Why should I fear non-existence?