I Have Proof

[McBell]

... a claim without proof is a falsehood.

No, it isn't.
Unless you mean a claim followed by "I have proof" is a false hood, perhaps.
But it is the claim of proof that would be the falsehood.

Person A: The sun isn't hot, I have proof.
Person B: What is your proof?
Person A: I cannot share this proof with you.
Person B: Then you're lying. Or delusional. One of the other. Or both.

The sun is hot, I have proof.
What is your proof?
I cannot share the proof with you.

The sun is still hot....

 

[Jeremiahcp]

No, it isn't.
Unless you mean a claim followed by "I have proof" is a false hood, perhaps.
But it is the claim of proof that would be the falsehood.


The sun is hot, I have proof.
What is your proof?
I cannot share the proof with you.

The sun is still hot....

No need to share that proof, as I already have it

 

[McBell]

No need to share that proof, as I already have it

I am not going to entertain that nonsense.

Have a nice day.

 

[Jeremiahcp]

I am not going to entertain that nonsense.

Have a nice day.

Bold empty claim.

 

[Ubon]

I think faith is a word used to attempt to give credit to that which cannot be proven.

 

[Segev Moran]

To modify means to have an affect on...
.

It seems like you are interperting the statement: "I have a proof" as a statement similar to: "I have a solid, object of sort, that can proof my point".
Maybe in this case, you are right, and the proof exists no matter who knows about it. But what about a case when someone see's with his own eyes that someone killed someone. Would you say the statement remains valid? Because he saw it, its a proof?

On that case, Every person that ever saw something... well.. you understand my point.

 

[Milton Platt]

I think you must mean that emotions in general are intersubjectively verifiable. Specific emotions -- e.g. whether John loves his dog -- are not intersubjectively verifiable.

I'm lost here....if you cannot verify any single one of them, how can you say that they exist in the aggregate?