• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

I heard some rather interesting POVs on racism, sexism, and Feminism. Thoughts?

StarryNightshade

Spiritually confused Jew
Premium Member
Okay, as many of you know, I consider myself to be a very liberal person. Earlier today, I went to dinner with a couple of members from a local UU church and some political topics came up. If I typed it all out, it would take up to much space (and possibly be TL;DR). Therefore, I'll give bullet points.


  • Humanism and Egalitarianism are not as good as Feminism.

One of the women I went to dinner with is a Queer feminist and is very involved in LGBT activism. If it wasn't bad enough that I said that I think the current state of the LGBT community is rather flawed, I stated that I consider myself more of a Humanist and Egalitarian, rather than a feminist. That I agreed with the message of equality within Feminism, but I felt that movements such as Feminism and LGBT activism where too exclusive. That with Humanism and Egalitarianism, it was more inclusive and doesn't single a single group out. That they have the potential to help most, if not all, groups of people in need.

However, I was told that, as a biological male, that using terms like "egalitarian" could be mistaken as Anti-Feminist or Male Rights sympathy. However, since they know I'm gay, and not a "bad person", it was okay for me to use that term; however flawed it was. :sarcastic


  • People of color can't be racist and woman can't be sexist

People of color and woman can be bigoted and discriminatory, but they can't be racist towards whites or sexist towards men. Racism and Sexism are institutionalized and benefit the majority (white people), and to put down minorities. Since people of color and woman don't have as much institutional power as white, biological men, they can't be inherently sexist or racist.



  • White people can't laugh at racist jokes, but other racial groups can.


When the topic of racist humor came up, the UU members said that, if there is a TV show or movie written by white people, featuring ethnic characters, and having humor involving stereotypes, then it is racist and people should not laugh at it. However, if an asian person writes stereotyping jokes about asians, or a black writer writes a movie script filled with racist jokes at the expense of black people, then it is okay. However, it would still be not okay for white people to laugh at such jokes.


What do you think about all of this? On one hand, I do agree that there is a major unbalance in institutionalized power in the US, and that non-heterosexuals, non-whites, and women have been discriminated against viscously. However, I also think it's a major over-generalization to say that, even though that certain groups don't hold much institutional power, that somehow makes them inherently incapable of being racist or sexist. Also the idea that feminism is the only path to gender equality.

Thoughts?
 
Last edited:

Saint Frankenstein

Here for the ride
Premium Member
I agree with you. They're all just labels at the end of the day. I'm a revolutionary far-leftist so I already believe in liberation and self-determination for all peoples.

I also think black people making jokes about white people is stupid and it's not even funny.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MD

oldbadger

Skanky Old Mongrel!
Okay, as many of you know, I consider myself to be a very liberal person. Earlier today, I went to dinner with a couple of members from a local UU church
Hi...... you never told us what dishes you chose.... :)

  • Humanism and Egalitarianism are not as good as Feminism.
Not really...... no.
Feminism is exclusive and separatist, whereas Eggies seek to be inclusive, which means that Eggies have a wider pov and 'people' interest.
The very fact that many Feminist subjects on RF are threaded in Feminist only sections shows this.

  • People of color can't be racist and woman can't be sexist
'People' can be both racist and sexist...... so this person who spoke is clearly both.

  • White people can't laugh at racist jokes, but other racial groups can.
Racists are found in all corners of humanity and both genders. Your dinner guests had some really obscure and tangled ideas.

The fact that they seem to promote their UU status while voicing such ideas is extremely sad.
 

StarryNightshade

Spiritually confused Jew
Premium Member
What exactly do you think racism is?

Any personal, social, or political belief system promoting one race as superior or others as inferior.

I'm not saying that there is no institutional racism (there most certainly is), but I don't think that exempts any non-white group or person from harboring racist attitudes or ideals. It just simply shows that one group's (or rather, individuals from a group) racism can have more influence and power; not that only one racial group has a monopoly on racism.
 
Last edited:

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
  • Humanism and Egalitarianism are not as good as Feminism.
I always kinda figured Feminism generally works towards Egalitarianism. If you look at our hunter-gatherer ancestors, their societies were generally egalitarian and there would be no need for a concept of Feminism.
  • People of color can't be racist and woman can't be sexist
This person needs to get out more. If people of color can't be racist, then what are they exactly when they are racist? And what do we call a woman sexist since she apparently can be sexist even though women can be sexist towards men and other women.
  • White people can't laugh at racist jokes, but other racial groups can.
I just did, about a few hours ago watching Gabriel Iglesias (a racist gag gift bag LMAO!!). But he doesn't really hit on the racial jokes like someone like Dave Chappelle does, or Chris Rock, both of whom I enjoy I laugh at when I watch them.
 
Last edited:

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I agree with you. They're all just labels at the end of the day. I'm a revolutionary far-leftist so I already believe in liberation and self-determination for all peoples.

I also think black people making jokes about white people is stupid and it's not even funny.
So long as the jokes may run in both directions, it can work. I love the cartoon, The
Boondocks, which skewers'm all: men, women, blacks, whites. But I see your point.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Okay, as many of you know, I consider myself to be a very liberal person. Earlier today, I went to dinner with a couple of members from a local UU church and some political topics came up. If I typed it all out, it would take up to much space (and possibly be TL;DR). Therefore, I'll give bullet points.
Humanism and Egalitarianism are not as good as Feminism.

People of color can't be racist and woman can't be sexist

White people can't laugh at racist jokes, but other racial groups can.

Thoughts?
It's the old "No True Scotsman" approach to feeling superior about ones team.
It reminds me of "Spike Lee Syndrome"...."We understand you, but you cannot understand us."
You're lucky though...your "LGBT privilege" gets you a pass in identifying as an egalitarian
(or "Eggie" per the badger codger) without tarnishing your liberal cred. Were I at your dinner,
I'd be dismissed as another victim blaming, testosterone poisoned, old, sexist cracker.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: MD

Apex

Somewhere Around Nothing
Okay, as many of you know, I consider myself to be a very liberal person. Earlier today, I went to dinner with a couple of members from a local UU church and some political topics came up. If I typed it all out, it would take up to much space (and possibly be TL;DR). Therefore, I'll give bullet points.


  • Humanism and Egalitarianism are not as good as Feminism.

One of the women I went to dinner with is a Queer feminist and is very involved in LGBT activism. If it wasn't bad enough that I said that I think the current state of the LGBT community is rather flawed, I stated that I consider myself more of a Humanist and Egalitarian, rather than a feminist. That I agreed with the message of equality within Feminism, but I felt that movements such as Feminism and LGBT activism where too exclusive. That with Humanism and Egalitarianism, it was more inclusive and doesn't single a single group out. That they have the potential to help most, if not all, groups of people in need.

However, I was told that, as a biological male, that using terms like "egalitarian" could be mistaken as Anti-Feminist or Male Rights sympathy. However, since they know I'm gay, and not a "bad person", it was okay for me to use that term; however flawed it was. :sarcastic


  • People of color can't be racist and woman can't be sexist

People of color and woman can be bigoted and discriminatory, but they can't be racist towards whites or sexist towards men. Racism and Sexism are institutionalized and benefit the majority (white people), and to put down minorities. Since people of color and woman don't have as much institutional power as white, biological men, they can't be inherently sexist or racist.



  • White people can't laugh at racist jokes, but other racial groups can.


When the topic of racist humor came up, the UU members said that, if there is a TV show or movie written by white people, featuring ethnic characters, and having humor involving stereotypes, then it is racist and people should not laugh at it. However, if an asian person writes stereotyping jokes about asians, or a black writer writes a movie script filled with racist jokes at the expense of black people, then it is okay. However, it would still be not okay for white people to laugh at such jokes.


What do you think about all of this? On one hand, I do agree that there is a major unbalance in institutionalized power in the US, and that non-heterosexuals, non-whites, and women have been discriminated against viscously. However, I also think it's a major over-generalization to say that, even though that certain groups don't hold much institutional power, that somehow makes them inherently incapable of being racist or sexist. Also the idea that feminism is the only path to gender equality.

Thoughts?
Sadly, I think views like these are beginning to gain more traction in certain groups throughout society.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
And you would probably have to wear a name badge saying thus.
Now I want one!

I couldn't find it on the web, but I did find this one I like....
Button%20Design%20%231%20Rosie%20the%20Riveter%203.451%20outside%20&%202.875%20inside.jpg
 
Last edited:

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
So long as the jokes may run in both directions, it can work. I love the cartoon, The
Boondocks, which skewers'm all: men, women, blacks, whites. But I see your point.
I've not gotten into The Boondocks, but South Park is definitely one of my favorite shows. You gotta love the great equal-opportunity offenders.
 

StarryNightshade

Spiritually confused Jew
Premium Member
I've had time to think about the conversation from last night, and this came to mind:

If the goals of equality are essentiality the same, then does it matter what label one uses?

The reason I prefer the Humanist label over Feminist or LGBT activist is because, in addition to these two, I also want to see the strives done for healthcare, the poor, workers, unions, prison reform, students, etc. I simply feel that Humanism embraces Feminism, LGBT activism, the aforementioned, and more. However, by being biologically male, and by not wearing the Feminism label, that will somehow make one a borderline bigot. This also goes for not fully embracing LGBT activism as a queer individual (which was another topic of conversation from last night).
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I've had time to think about the conversation from last night, and this came to mind:
If the goals of equality are essentiality the same, then does it matter what label one uses?
The reason I prefer the Humanist label over Feminist or LGBT activist is because, in addition to these two, I also want to see the strives done for healthcare, the poor, workers, unions, prison reform, students, etc. I simply feel that Humanism embraces Feminism, LGBT activism, the aforementioned, and more. However, by being biologically male, and by not wearing the Feminism label, that will somehow make one a borderline bigot. This also goes for not fully embracing LGBT activism as a queer individual (which was another topic of conversation from last night).
Agendas aren't just about values & stances on issues. They're also about brand, camaraderie,
loyalty, & opposition against someone. As GW Bush might say, yer either fer us or agin us!
 

MysticSang'ha

Big Squishy Hugger
Premium Member
Okay, as many of you know, I consider myself to be a very liberal person. Earlier today, I went to dinner with a couple of members from a local UU church and some political topics came up. If I typed it all out, it would take up to much space (and possibly be TL;DR). Therefore, I'll give bullet points.


  • Humanism and Egalitarianism are not as good as Feminism.

One of the women I went to dinner with is a Queer feminist and is very involved in LGBT activism. If it wasn't bad enough that I said that I think the current state of the LGBT community is rather flawed, I stated that I consider myself more of a Humanist and Egalitarian, rather than a feminist. That I agreed with the message of equality within Feminism, but I felt that movements such as Feminism and LGBT activism where too exclusive. That with Humanism and Egalitarianism, it was more inclusive and doesn't single a single group out. That they have the potential to help most, if not all, groups of people in need.

However, I was told that, as a biological male, that using terms like "egalitarian" could be mistaken as Anti-Feminist or Male Rights sympathy. However, since they know I'm gay, and not a "bad person", it was okay for me to use that term; however flawed it was. :sarcastic

Meh, so you're a humanist. Go on wit' yo bad self, then.

It would be as if you didn't identify yourself as a Christian, but if you believe in atonement, personal sacrifice, and generosity, somebody might see that as the definition of "Christian". They may apply a label to you that you do not necessarily agree with.

From folks who refuse to see themselves as feminist, but as egalitarian, that's fine. I'll just agree or disagree with any perspectives that either promotes equal opportunity, rights, and protections or fights against them. And you are free to do the same.


  • People of color can't be racist and woman can't be sexist

People of color and woman can be bigoted and discriminatory, but they can't be racist towards whites or sexist towards men. Racism and Sexism are institutionalized and benefit the majority (white people), and to put down minorities. Since people of color and woman don't have as much institutional power as white, biological men, they can't be inherently sexist or racist.

At the moment, I find problems with the way we see the distinction between privileged class bigotry and protected class bigotry. For some, sexism is sexism, but I find different variance and degrees to it. Maybe because it doesn't sting as much when somebody calls me a "cracker" as a pejorative as it stings when somebody calls me a "******."

I'm sure dialogue can find some language that would be helpful to make those distinctions.

  • White people can't laugh at racist jokes, but other racial groups can.


When the topic of racist humor came up, the UU members said that, if there is a TV show or movie written by white people, featuring ethnic characters, and having humor involving stereotypes, then it is racist and people should not laugh at it. However, if an asian person writes stereotyping jokes about asians, or a black writer writes a movie script filled with racist jokes at the expense of black people, then it is okay. However, it would still be not okay for white people to laugh at such jokes.

Not that is isn't okay to laugh (I've never heard that from minority friends of mine). It's just....be aware. That's all. Whites can't claim to know what living is like as a minority race/ethnicity. The best jokes tend to come from honest experience, since life is goofy like that. So, when whites joke about minority races, it's best when the experience shared is how goofy one's experience is. Not what black people are really like and how goofy are THEY?

Let me put it to you another way. I can joke and laugh about what it's like having a period, giving birth, and going through menopause. There's a LARGE number of weird, hilarious, and outright bizarre things that occur that are specifically female. It's not that it is NOT okay for males to joke at all ever about these distinctly female experiences, but do it from how goofy and bizarre the male perspective is on those things. As a female, I can only joke so much about testicles before it starts getting weird.

What do you think about all of this? On one hand, I do agree that there is a major unbalance in institutionalized power in the US, and that non-heterosexuals, non-whites, and women have been discriminated against viscously. However, I also think it's a major over-generalization to say that, even though that certain groups don't hold much institutional power, that somehow makes them inherently incapable of being racist or sexist. Also the idea that feminism is the only path to gender equality.

Thoughts?

If egalitarianism shows activism and rhetoric that addresses and does something toward gender equality, I'll join their ranks. At this point in the game, though, I've found greater success through feminism.

On the other hand, I'm sure you'll find people on the other end of the spectrum who insist that minorities, queers, and women are NOT discriminated against, and are just playing the victim card. I tend to debate with those folks a lot more, fwiw.
 
Top