Yes, really. I do not care about his sorry plight nor do I have any mercy. It is not justice to show mercy towards the person who is in the wrong. Mercy is for God to show this man if He so chooses. That is not my department.
The Baha'iTeachings.org article I got today is pertinent to this topic.
What to Do, Spiritually, with Your Anger
"We all get mad. Others hurt us, on purpose or by accident. Things don’t turn out our way, and our blood boils. This can make us react in ways we later regret – so what can we do about our anger?
The ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle believed in the necessity of anger – and in its usefulness. In his theory of virtue, anger can be virtuous if used appropriately and moderately. In
Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle wrote: “The man who is angry at the right things and with the right people, and, further, as he ought, when he ought, and as long as he ought, is praised.”
According to this perspective, a person could be justifiably angry at someone who has done him or her an injustice – or even more importantly, has perpetrated injustice in general.
A few centuries after Aristotle came Seneca, a Roman philosopher who begged to differ. Seneca believed that anger was never justified, and had no real use in a good life.
So what do Baha’is believe on this matter? It may surprise you to know that the
Baha’i teachings seem to side with Aristotle. The reason, according to
Abdul-Baha in his book
Some Answered Questions, is that anger, like other emotions, is not intrinsically bad:
In the innate nature of things there is no evil — all is good. This applies even to certain apparently blameworthy attributes and dispositions which seem inherent in some people, but which are not in reality reprehensible. For example, you can see in a nursing child, from the beginning of its life, the signs of greed, of anger, and of ill temper; and so it might be argued that good and evil are innate in the reality of man, and that this is contrary to the pure goodness of the innate nature and of creation. The answer is that greed, which is to demand ever more, is a praiseworthy quality provided that it is displayed under the right circumstances. Thus, should a person show greed in acquiring science and knowledge, or in the exercise of compassion, high-mindedness, and justice, this would be most praiseworthy. And should he direct his anger and wrath against the bloodthirsty tyrants who are like ferocious beasts, this too would be most praiseworthy. But should he display these qualities under other conditions, this would be deserving of blame.
It follows therefore that in existence and creation there is no evil at all, but that when man’s innate qualities are used in an unlawful way, they become blameworthy.
From this perspective, anger itself is not inherently good or bad, but becomes so when used at a certain time, in a certain way. So according to Aristotle and Abdu’l-Baha, anger, if used appropriately, can be a noble quality.
To continue reading:
https://bahaiteachings.org/what-to-do-spiritually-with-your-anger