• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

I see no value in atheism

ArtieE

Well-Known Member
"Atheism is the absence of belief in the existence of gods."

What is implicit in this definition of the meaning of the concept of atheism is that an atheist believes in no gods... It's not as though an atheist does not form an idea in their mind as to what the concept of god means to them, they do......but rather than believe this idea to be true, the believe it is not true...
Atheism is the absence of belief in the existence of gods, not the belief that gods don't exist. All atheists have an absence of belief in the existence of gods. Some atheists in addition to having an absence of belief in the existence of gods actively believe gods don't exist. These we call "strong atheists".
 

ArtieE

Well-Known Member
We know something is true by direct observation or by the testimony of others.
The testimony of others can of course be completely unreliable.
We may acquire knowledge in two ways - either by direct observation (you see a man knocked down by a car in the street), or through the testimony of others (you read an account of the accident in the evening paper
Who in their right mind would believe everything they read in the papers?
Now, who will say that such faith, such willingness to accept testimony, is unscientific, or unworthy of a rational being?
I will. If a person testifies that he has been abducted by aliens throughout his life believing him without any corroborating factual objective evidence would be completely unworthy of a rational being.
 
Last edited:

Ben Dhyan

Veteran Member
Atheism is the absence of belief in the existence of gods, not the belief that gods don't exist. All atheists have an absence of belief in the existence of gods. Some atheists in addition to having an absence of belief in the existence of gods actively believe gods don't exist. These we call "strong atheists".
Repeating the absurdity does not change the facts.....let us proceed methodically to see how this works out...

First question...presuming you are an atheist, and that you know the concept of god exists...did you or did you not form an idea of what the concept 'god' meant when you first heard or read about it?
 

JoStories

Well-Known Member
My concern is that people are hijacking the general term "atheist" and redefining it so as to more easily attack anyone who doesn't believe in God. If they redefine the term as having a positive belief that God does not exist, it is distorting what an atheist is into a much more declarative position, declaring that atheism is a world view, when it certainly is not. Strong atheism is, but not agnosticism and weak atheism. They are simply defined as a lacking of certain beliefs.
I agree. But that doesn't change that various cultures will and do view some concepts differently. There are some, mostly hardheaded theists, who will see atheism as a declarative statement of a belief. I think it justifies their opinion that atheists are wrong and that God does exist, and that arheists are denying that fact.
 

paarsurrey

Veteran Member
How so? Belief in something, such as God, requires a cognizant process to accept that belief. From a natural POV, with no knowledge or exposure to the idea of a deity, no one would be a theist.

Like one believes in one's parents very naturally from birth till one dies. The concepts could evolve with one's knowledge and experience and become strong with one's journey into maturity.

Regards
 

Looncall

Well-Known Member
"Atheism is the absence of belief in the existence of gods."

What is implicit in this definition of the meaning of the concept of atheism is that an atheist believes in no gods... It's not as though an atheist does not form an idea in their mind as to what the concept of god means to them, they do......but rather than believe this idea to be true, the believe it is not true...

Furthermore, this idea of god that an atheist believes not to exist, may not be, and most likely isn't, the same idea of god as held by other atheists, and for that matter among theists...and definitely among non-dualists...
I find it helpful to include the notion of provisional disbelief. That is, lacking convincing evidence of god(s), one proceeds on the basis that gods do not exist until such evidence is encountered.
This is different from a definite statement that no gods exist.
 

Ben Dhyan

Veteran Member
I find it helpful to include the notion of provisional disbelief. That is, lacking convincing evidence of god(s), one proceeds on the basis that gods do not exist until such evidence is encountered.
This is different from a definite statement that no gods exist.
That would fall under agnostic....
 

ArtieE

Well-Known Member
Repeating the absurdity does not change the facts.....let us proceed methodically to see how this works out...

First question...presuming you are an atheist, and that you know the concept of god exists...did you or did you not form an idea of what the concept 'god' meant when you first heard or read about it?
I didn't form any idea of any concept myself. I just looked at all the other concepts people had formed from the Christian God to Allah and Brahma and Zeus and Thor and Poseidon and on and on. I have simply never had any need to believe in any kind of supernatural superhuman beings or forces or whatever. I have never had any special need to believe they don't exist either.
 
Last edited:

ArtieE

Well-Known Member
I find it helpful to include the notion of provisional disbelief. That is, lacking convincing evidence of god(s), one proceeds on the basis that gods do not exist until such evidence is encountered.
This is different from a definite statement that no gods exist.
This would be an agnostic atheist.
 

ArtieE

Well-Known Member
I agree that by nature one is theist.

Regards
Are you a Muslim then? Every Child is Born Muslim Or does it depend on where you are born? Is a child born in a predominantly Muslim country born a believer in Allah and is a child born in a predominantly Christian country born a believer in God and a child born in a predominantly Hindu country born a believer in Brahma? Or are they just born believing in a general god?
 

paarsurrey

Veteran Member
Are you a Muslim then? Every Child is Born Muslim Or does it depend on where you are born? Is a child born in a predominantly Muslim country born a believer in Allah and is a child born in a predominantly Christian country born a believer in God and a child born in a predominantly Hindu country born a believer in Brahma? Or are they just born believing in a general god?

Core of every revealed religion is same and in origin they are from the same One-True-God.
In that sense every person born in any part of the world or belonging to whatever ethnicity/language is a theist naturally.

Regards
 

Willamena

Just me
Premium Member
My concern is that people are hijacking the general term "atheist" and redefining it so as to more easily attack anyone who doesn't believe in God. If they redefine the term as having a positive belief that God does not exist, it is distorting what an atheist is into a much more declarative position, declaring that atheism is a world view, when it certainly is not. Strong atheism is, but not agnosticism and weak atheism. They are simply defined as a lacking of certain beliefs.
Heaven's sake... No one is hijacking anything, it's just a semantical discussion. The term strong atheist fits my beliefs, and I've just been explaining how. If you feel the very definition of the term is threatened by that, that's your problem.
 

Willamena

Just me
Premium Member
And both a connotation and the denotation of atheism are "a lack of belief in a God". I fail to see the issue.
If connoting is equated with denoting, it goes away. It's just a denoting.

Edit: Unless you meant it in two senses, with "lack of belief" in some non-literal sense. But I didn't get that from what you said.
 

Willamena

Just me
Premium Member
Strong atheism is, but not agnosticism and weak atheism. They are simply defined as a lacking of certain beliefs.
The agnostic neither believes nor doesn't.

I am hard atheist and agnostic. I found that, in understanding the way in which god neither exists nor doesn't.
 
Top