erm said:
The Bible never described the poor as a gift.
Listen, my dear brothers and sisters: Has not God chosen those who are poor in the eyes of the world to be
rich in faith and to inherit the kingdom he promised those who love him? (James 2:5)
This is an example of the opposite, not an example of those don't believe they are, but actually are.
You said this in response to my post about Rev 3:14-18. Poverty in Judaism is not only about wealth, nor is it only about wealth in the NT. In Israel wealth comes from making wise choices, usually. Poverty comes from making stupid choices, usually. There are exceptions and ill fortune, but the poor are always present. A 'Poor' person tended to be looked down upon just as today. While Judaism's laws demanded that the poor be treated fairly, the laws were necessary because people tended not to treat them fairly. Even today when something is stolen its the poor people that the police frisk first, because poverty is associated with evil and stupidity. The wealthy have awesome opportunities and credit while the poor must be assisted and have no credit, are called 'Lower Class'. Oh yes, these people mentioned in Revelation 3:14-18 thought they were spiritual, but they were spiritually impoverished. The same thing can happen to any group that becomes smug.
Not complicated at all. Trusting in Jesus for one's salvation is believing in what Jesus did and said. I believe in the rest of chapter 3 as well.
Trusting in Jesus isn't the same as obeying him. The reason that church at large is a failure to this very day is that it doesn't obey him. He is galaxies away from us up in heaven, somewhere. He left us here with the holy spirit to guide us, but there are many people who claim that teachers and pastors must guide us using very exacting Biblical standards. John 3 goes against what those people say. John 3:18 is part of a dialogue between Jesus and Nicodemus about how discipleship is insufficient (baptism in water) or even ineffective, and that the holy spirit gives birth however it likes regardless of what we think that it ought to be doing according to our own experiences. This is the context in which I see John 3:18. The holy spirit could, for instance, give spiritual birth to a thief, to a New Age pot-smoking hipster and to a lying car-salesman all in the same hour. We would have no say in the matter.
It is the holy spirit that gives spiritual birth and not a series of doctrinal lessons, and we don't know where the spirit comes from or where it is going. If you would trust Jesus, then it would mean letting anyone partake of communion instead of excluding them on the basis of doctrinal differences. Naturally this kind of obedience is what shook the priests and leaders in Israel, because it made them extra-curricular. Naturally they were the ones who rejected Jesus. This is why Nicodemus was meeting Jesus in secret. How can you say to me that you believe in the rest of John 3 while at the same time tell my you are a member of CoC? I have heard that you practice exclusion in your communion, and John 3 is specifically against that practice.