No, you did not agree. You said...
"
Uhh... the bible talks about like Noah's ark?
And you say it is historically accurate?
Surely you are joking? Right...?
Of freakin' course there are coins etc. NONE
of it in the remotest way supports any supernatural
claims. You do know that, right?
That is not agreeing to the historical accuracy of the biblical accounts with regard to people, places, and events
, but it is diversion to the topic of supernatural elements in the Bible.
I chose to focus on the BoM as I was once a Mormon, but I really didn't desire to get into an analysis of the either the BoM or the Koran, nevertheless I consider the biblical scriptures to be historically far superior to either the BoM ...
"Since the publication of the Book of Mormon in 1830, Mormon archaeologists have attempted to find archaeological evidence to support it. Members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church) and other denominations of the Latter Day Saint movement generally believe that the Book of Mormon describes ancient historical events in the Americas, but historians and archaeologists do not regard it as a work of ancient American history."
Archaeology and the Book of Mormon - Wikipedia
...or the Koran...
Are there errors in the Qur’an? – Are there historical inaccuracies?
While the list of historical inaccuracies and anachronisms is vast, one has been selected for discussion here. Surah 20 relays the incident of the golden calf. In Surah 20:85-88, 95 we read:
“He [Allah] said, ‘We have tempted thy people since thou didist leave them. The Samaratin has led them into error.’ Then Moses returned…and we cast them [(gold) ornaments], as the Samaritan also threw them, into the fire.’ (Then he brought out for them a Calf, a mere body that lowed; and they said, ‘This is your god, and the god of Moses, whom he has forgotten.’)…Moses said, ‘And thou, Samaritan, what was thy business?’”
Now, let us consider this for just a moment. How can a Samaritan have led the Israelites astray at the time of Moses (approx 1400 B.C.) when the city of Samaria was founded by King Omri about 870 B.C.? The Samaritans did not exist until after the exile of the Northern Kingdom of Israel and the resettlement of the area under King Sargon II in 722 B.C. with non-Israelites who then adopted a syncretism (mixture) between the religion of the Jews and their own polytheistic background. The Samaritans did not exist until 530 years after Moses. By this mistake alone, the Qur’an can be rendered unreliable and certainly not an inerrant work of God. Are there errors in the Qur'an (Koran)?
Since I believe the Bible to be historically accurate with far more & continual archeological evidence surfacing to support the events mentioned in the biblical scriptures, over any other religious texts, then I have no reason to doubt not only the historical accounts of people/places, but the supernatural, as well. After all, if the God of the Bible is the Creator of heaven and earth, the God of accurate history, the God of accurate prophetic future, and the God of eternity....how difficult is what humans call "supernatural" for such a Being ?
"Accurate". You know the word is relative. How accurate is kind of
an important detail.
The bibke correctly identifies geographical features, etc.
Nobody is denying that the bible includes real things,
recounted in some degree of detail. I tried to agree with
you on that.
IF you are claimung 100 % accuracy, you are beyond
reason and you can quit here.
If not then you can ponder "how accurate" and how good is good
enough. 5% accurate? 23%? 98.6%? And which part is
right, which wrong?
Or maybe those are thought to avoid.
Sherlock Holmes mysteries accurately describe many
things about London, logic, human nature etc.
Some day, one might not know if it is a true account.
Now as for the whole bible being "accurate" or
"factual", we have all of genesis such as the 6 day
poof, flood, that stuff.
Didn't happen. You want to rely on archaeologists
etc to confirm parts of the bible, but dont like it
when, as they did for BOM, show that
facts do not
support the stories?
That is a prime exampke of intellectual
dishonesty if that is what you do, and as
earlier, we can quit right here if so.
As for the parts shown to be true supporting the
parts that cannot be confirmed, and that every bit
of logic, science, and on -the- ground inspection
(plus some freakin' common sense) show to be
fiction..really?
Surely you do not apply that standard to your life.
Any good liar, after all, salts his story with good
facts. Not just liars, it is how historical novels
are done.
Wandering back to ye bible and its degree of accuracy-
Do you hold that Exodus, Adam and Eve, and Noah's
Ark are accurate stories?
You avoided answering before. You really should
say, it is quite the litmus test for people and the
quality of their beliefs!